Trending
Remember the origin of Schwebel Bread
DEAR EDITOR:
With the announcement of Schwebel's closing, I realized I am probably the only living person in the world who can provide details preceding its birth in 1906.
It was probably in the summer of 1905 that Dora Schwebel, a 17-year-old newlywed, had the idea to bake bread for her neighborhood on Haseltine Avenue in East Youngstown, later called Campbell. She realized her stove was too small to meet her needs. She then decided to take a horse-drawn streetcar downtown to East Federal Street in Youngstown. There was a store at 27 E. Federal St. called Wilkins Leonard Hardware Company, which was known for its hardware and large, cast-iron stoves. The owner of the store, Mr. Charles F Wilkins waited on her and sold her his largest Eclipse (Tappan) stove. He realized that delivering it to her house at 28 Haseltine would require him to use an extra horse for his delivery wagon and two extra men for lifting it into her house. He satisfied Dora, his customer and her young husband Joe, and she happily started baking bread for the neighborhood.
Her business quickly grew out of her neighborhood, and she first hired neighborhood boys to help her husband deliver the extra loaves. She returned to Mr. Wilkins' store within a month to purchase five new Schwinn bicycles for her expanding delivery fleet, and everyone knows the rest of the story.
I never met my grandfather Charles F Wilkins, who passed away in 1948, but for many years it was said that he would tell how proud he was to have launched the young newlywed Schwebel couple into the successful Schwebel Baking Company.
All of us will forever remember that aroma that emanated from the East Midlothian factory as we passed by and our memory of Schwebel Bread will live on forever.
Dr CHARLES E WILKINS
Youngstown
A look at what PLYMC meetings are like
DEAR EDITOR:
As a member of the Poland community group, Save Our Library, I've attended four Public Library of Youngstown and Mahoning County board meetings. Readers should know what that's like. Come along with me!
PLYMC Board meetings take place at different libraries in the system. As an observer, you're invited into the meeting space. Enjoy that moment; your welcome ends there. The board sits in a U formation, often facing a screen where a few board members Zoom in. Generally, the public sits behind the U. This means one-third of the board and the library director will sit with their backs to you.
And, rarely, if ever, will they turn to acknowledge you. The board follows agenda items you'd expect: minutes, treasurer's report, etc. Then comes the period for public comment, the only time community attendees can speak. Each has three minutes. When that time expires, a bell rings. At meetings where our members have spoken, not a single board member has asked a question or made a comment. The board votes, or goes into executive session, and then votes. The meeting is adjourned. You are on your way home.
Maybe you're thinking, "I guess that's how it goes." But should it? I'm asking that you consider this meeting protocol as a metaphor for the way the library board, the library director, and PLYMC administrators have interacted with the Save Our Library group as they've decided the Poland Library's fate. We can enter their space, but we might as well scream into an abyss. Some press coverage claims the PLYMC has been open to dialogue, but, truly, we've received only silence and the dinging of a bell.
As library lovers, taxpayers, voters, and Mahoning County citizens, don't we all deserve, at least, a conversation?
BETSY FORD
Struthers
The truth about your electric bill
DEAR EDITOR:
The electric bill on your kitchen table is about 20% higher than it was a year ago, and the explanations coming from electric utilities haven't been very satisfying.
The easy answer, the one everyone is talking about, is data centers. Blame artificial intelligence! Blame the tech companies building giant servers in the Mahoning Valley! There's something to that angle, but it's not the whole story. And getting the story wrong means we'll end up with the wrong solutions -- ones that could cost Ohioans even more in the long run.
Here's the part of the conversation that isn't getting enough attention: as electricity demand surges -- driven by data centers, AI, manufacturing growth and electrification -- some regulated utilities want to use this moment to re-establish something Ohio got rid of decades ago: monopoly control over power generation.
In the 1990s, Ohio made a deliberate decision to separate power generation from the wires that deliver it. Independent power producers would compete to generate the cheapest, most reliable electricity. Utilities would focus on delivering it. That competition has saved PJM-area customers roughly $5 billion every single year. It may not feel like anyone is saving money right now, but imagine how much worse it would be if utilities were holding us hostage.
Not surprisingly, some utilities see dollar signs in all this new demand. They want to cash in on the backs of captive customers while profits flow to investors.
We need to sound this alarm. Quite frankly, no one is.
Thirty years of evidence shows competitive markets deliver lower costs, faster innovation, and better accountability than monopoly generation. Letting utilities rebuild monopolies at ratepayer expense would be a disaster.
At the same time, data centers should pay their own way. When new industrial customers require new infrastructure, they should fund it -- not existing residential customers. Ohio has taken steps in this direction, and the legislature should continue.
The billions flowing into new generation, transmission and data centers represent genuine economic opportunity. But capturing it while keeping bills manageable for families in East Liverpool, Youngstown and Warren requires getting the policy framework right: trust competitive markets, make new demand fund new infrastructure, and fix the real bottlenecks -- permitting, transmission, workforce -- instead of dismantling what works.
The data centers are coming. The investment is real. The question is whether we share the prosperity or just absorb the costs. The answer depends on choices being made right now in Columbus and Washington.
Pay attention. And demand better.
JOHN R. MORROW
Liverpool Township
Youngstown must stop animal cruelty
DEAR EDITOR:
Youngstown is facing an animal cruelty crisis, yet city leadership continues to treat animal welfare enforcement as someone else's responsibility.
The reality is simple: protecting animals from abuse, neglect, abandonment, and cruelty is a public responsibility. It is not a favor performed by a private charity on behalf of the city. It is a fundamental duty of local government to ensure that laws are enforced and vulnerable members of the community are protected.
For years, Animal Charity of Ohio has served as the area's only humane law enforcement agency, investigating cruelty complaints, rescuing abused animals, and carrying out responsibilities that directly benefit the residents of Youngstown. Yet city officials continue to discuss funding as though providing financial support would somehow be helping Animal Charity. That view completely misses the point.
The city would not be doing Animal Charity a favor. The city would be paying for essential public services being performed within its borders.
When a municipality relies on an outside organization to carry out critical enforcement functions, it has an obligation to provide adequate support. Instead, Youngstown's leadership has too often acted as though the burden should fall entirely on a nonprofit organization and private donors.
Even more troubling is the lack of public accountability. Residents deserve to hear city leaders acknowledge the seriousness of the cruelty problem, explain how it developed, and present a concrete plan to address it. Instead, there has been little admission of responsibility and little evidence of urgency.
Leadership requires more than expressing concern after a high-profile cruelty case makes headlines. It requires ownership. It requires integrity. It requires recognizing that when systemic animal abuse continues unchecked, the city itself has a responsibility to act.
Research has repeatedly shown links between animal cruelty, public safety concerns, and broader community neglect. Communities that fail to address animal abuse often face other quality-of-life and crime issues as well. Ignoring the problem does not make it disappear.
Youngstown residents should not have to rely solely on charitable donations to fund the enforcement of cruelty laws. Humane investigations are not optional services. They are part of maintaining a safe, compassionate, and accountable community.
The mayor and city administration should stop framing this issue as whether the city can help Animal Charity of Ohio. The real question is whether Youngstown is willing to fulfill its responsibility to the people and animals of the city.
The answer should be yes.
Until city leaders publicly acknowledge the cruelty crisis, commit meaningful funding, and accept accountability for protecting animals within Youngstown, residents have every right to question whether their government is taking the issue seriously enough.
MARK MATASIC
Campbell
Save Our Library group still has hope
DEAR EDITOR:
For more than a year I have dedicated time to the Save Our Library citizens' group in Poland. The issue under our scrutiny centers on the PLYMC's recent heartless decision to abandon the magnificent library building in Poland, constructed a mere 25 years ago for the sum of $7.5 million in taxpayers' dollars and some private donations. Surely, this architectural gem has doubled in value since then, as has my humble 1,400-square-foot home located just one block away. So, its current value should be somewhere near $15 million.
This true valuation added to their estimated cost to build something new ought to be included in the total price of relocation. This would more than double the figure CEO Aimee Fifarek suggests.
The Poland branch has been cast in the role of "the bad seed" being devoid of redeeming qualities. Never once was there a logical discussion of the innumerable priceless characteristics that this unique library possesses. Clearly, there are many because it was originally considered the system's architectural gem. Deferred maintenance and neglect have led to the problems now facing us. But the problems at 311 S. Main St. can be repaired for far less money than building anew.
It is, after all, listed in a renowned publication as one of the country's 100 most beautiful libraries. They recently spent many, many millions of dollars to remodel the Reuben McMillan main library downtown. Why not Poland?
At the PLYMC board meeting on April 29 more than 200 concerned taxpayers watched as three brave board members broke with the "group think" by voting against the motion for relocation. The fact that the vote was not unanimous gives our group hope. Now we are asking for reconsideration. If three individuals can see a way to making the additional investment in 311 S. Main St. perhaps more can follow suit?
Moving forward, scrutiny must be paid to the unbridled authority of the PLYMC as a nonprofit entity and legal changes made to provide Mahoning County taxpayers some accountability.
Our dedication to this cause remains strong.
Can it last until 2029? You betcha!
W. RICK SCHILLING
Poland
'Disclosure Day' made me sad
DEAR EDITOR:
A new science fiction thriller directed by Steven Spielberg, "Disclosure Day," is a tale of aliens on Earth and the cover-up of their presence. The film premiered on June 12.
It was a little jarring. The opening scene showed two fighters in a ring giving body slams to each other. The sound effects were so loud the sound hit your face in waves -- the vibration was so intense, they actually made your seat and the floor shake. Ill-timed?
President Donald Trump hosted a special Ultimate Fighting Championship on the South Lawn of the White House on June 14, his 80th birthday, only two days later.
Generally, I go to the theater to get out of reality; in this case it was the opposite.
Overall, it was a sad movie for me.
A 1961 pop song by Sue Thompson expresses this, "Sad Movies (make me cry)."
Sa-a-a-d movies always make me cry.
He said he had to work so I went to the show alone.
They turned down the lights and turned the projector on
And just as the news of the world started to begin.
I saw my darlin' and my best friend walk in.
Though I was sitting there, they didn't see
And so they sat right down in front of me.
When he kissed her lips, I almost died.
And in the middle of the color cartoon, I started to cry
Oh-oh-oh sa-a-a-d movies always make me cry
Oh-oh-oh sa-a-a-d movies always make me cry.
And so I got up and slowly walked on home
And Mama saw the tears and said, "What's wrong?"
And so to keep from telling her a lie.
I just said, "Sa-a-a-d movies make me cry."
Oh-oh-oh sa-a-a-d movies always make me cry
Oh-oh-oh sa-a-a-d movies always make me cry.
Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh
Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh.
Sa-a-a-d movies make me cry-i-i.
PAUL LAWSON
McDonald
Be safe while enjoying holiday fireworks
DEAR EDITOR:
As America prepares to celebrate the Declaration of Independence and its 250th birthday this July 4, we at Phantom Fireworks encourage everyone to honor this historic milestone with both excitement and consideration. For two and a half centuries, Independence Day has brought families, friends and communities together to celebrate the freedoms and traditions that unite us all. As we gather to mark this once-in-a-lifetime occasion, we encourage everyone to enjoy fireworks responsibly while remaining mindful of neighbors, veterans, pets and others who may be sensitive to the sights and sounds of the holiday. By celebrating with respect and courtesy, we can help ensure a safe, memorable and enjoyable Fourth of July for all.
There are several ways to be considerate of your neighbors when using fireworks. Clear and early communication is key. Let your neighbors know when you plan to begin your display, especially if you live near veterans. That notice should include an estimated start time and duration. This allows them to make any necessary accommodations for themselves, their children or their pets, who may be more comfortable enjoying the festivities from a distance. Also, sharing your plans gives neighbors the chance to step outside and enjoy the show together, fostering a sense of community and celebration.
Another key aspect of consideration is respecting property. We urge customers to carefully choose launch sites and fallout zones to prevent debris from affecting neighboring properties. Wet the ground ahead of time to ensure errant sparks or ashes do not ignite dry or grassy areas. After the show, thoroughly clean up all debris and check adjacent properties to ensure no remnants are left behind.
Phantom Fireworks encourages all customers to make safety their top priority by following product instructions, adhering to local laws and regulations and using good judgment when celebrating.
Thanks to increased consumer awareness and responsible fireworks use, fireworks consumption has grown by more than 175% from 1994 to 2025, while fireworks-related injuries have declined by 62.6% during the same period. By continuing to celebrate responsibly, we can help ensure a safe and memorable July 4 for everyone.
For more safety information, recommendations and guidelines, please visit the Phantom Fireworks website: https://fireworks.com/safety.
William A. Weimer
Vice President
Phantom Fireworks