facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Columbiana


Residential
2 bedroom, 2 bath
$134900


Poland


Residential
4 bedroom, 7 bath
$999900


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
 

« Your Newspaper

Here's why I liked 'Pavlik-Taylor II' better than 'I'

By Todd Franko (Contact)


Published February 17, 2008

It's the morning after the fight, Pavlik-Taylor II, and, as a sports fan, I feel pretty good about it.

It's been interesting reading some of the stuff online.

I think as humans, and especially as sports fans, we long to witness those moments that will linger for a generation (or at least linger to make a Fox Sports Network "50 Best Moments in _____" show that airs at 2 a.m.)

Pavlik-Taylor I had that. Pavlik-Taylor II did not.

In PTII, there was no historic second-round rise from the canvas. That was PTI.

In PTII, there was no crushing seventh-round barrage that prompted the ref to stop the fight without event a 10-count. That was PTI.  

While I'll remember those rounds of PTI forever, I liked PTII better. Why?

You had two elite athletes who knew each other completely and thus employed a good defense as much as they employed a good offense. Taylor wasn't naive enough this time around to get backed into corners; Pavlik wasn't edgy enough to stick his chin out after a barrage.  

It was absent of any lucky shot that cost either athlete. It was absent of any cockiness or flash that can taint a good athlete.

It was strategic. It was classy.

I equate my appreciation for PTII to my love of my favorite sport -- hockey.

Lots of folks like hockey for the fighting, the hooliganism and the bar-fight atmosphere that can erupt on the ice. Many fans are disappointed when it doesn't happen. I like hockey for the speed, the grace and the teamwork. A 6-5 game with no fights is more appealing to me than a 7-3 game with four fights.

Craft over crush; intelligence over idiocy.

You cannot help but have more appreciation for the skill, instincts and sportsmanship of Pavlik and Taylor after PTII. While Pavlik walked away with the win, I don’t think either fighter lost.

PTII won’t make 2008 boxing highlight films. It won’t make a late-night Fox highlights show.

But it made for a good night for true sports fans.

Comments

1yunkstahn(3 comments)posted 6 years, 2 months ago

Well said. P-T II is an example of boxing--and athletics in general--at very best: dignity, sportsmanship, professionalism, and skill. These are what make Kelly Pavlik a great fighter, and Taylor as well. They both have so much to be proud of.

GO KELLY! GO YOUNGSTOWN!

Suggest removal:



News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport