facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Poland


Residential
4 bedroom, 7 bath
$949900


Poland


Residential
5 bedroom, 6 bath
$395000


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
 

« rrust1

Can we learn from the past?!?

By rrust1 (Contact)


Published October 27, 2008

Something that we should all be aware of and think about.

Date: 1950

Topic: Upcoming election between Richard Nixon (R) and Helen Gahagan Douglas (D)

Question: How to discredit Gahagan Douglas in the week immediately prior to the election.

Plan: Accuse Gahagan Douglas being a Communist and attempt to link her to communist roots without any chance for her to respond. Distribute “pink” flyers subtly labeling Gahagan Douglas as a Communist sympathizer.

Have candidate surrogates not the candidate themselves lustily voice the link to communists at every opportunity.

“Nixon waged an inspiring red-baiting campaign and was unrelenting in his charges. If he never actually called her a communist, saying she was "pink right down to her underwear" was not a fashion critique. His legions were yet less restrained. Murray Chotiner, Nixon's campaign manager, printed an infamous flyer that was handed out at rallies. Printed on pink paper (and, thus, forever known as the "pink sheet"), it more than implied a connection between Douglas and communism.

Other Nixon campaign workers called Douglas a communist when they approached strangers on the street. They called her a communist when they telephoned thousands of homes the night before the election. In an era when the nation's fear was palpable, the strategy was a great success. On Election Day Nixon won handily.” © 2007 Carl Albert Center at the University of Oklahoma

Date: 2008

Topic: Upcoming election between John McCain and Barach Obama.

Question: How to discredit Obama in the week immediately prior to the election.

Plan: Accuse Obama being a terrorist and attempt to link him to terrorism without any chance for him to respond.

Mail out misleading flyers with innuendo suggesting that Obama might be a terrorist.

Not the candidate (McCain) but have surrogates like Sara Palin lustily voice the link to terrorism at every opportunity.

McCain has waged an inspiring terrorist-baiting campaign and has been unrelenting in his charges. If he never actually called Obama a terrorist, he is certainly seeking to link him to terrorist organization. His legions are yet less restrained. The RNC is releasing a flyer with “Terrorists at our doors on the front and a picture of Obama and the words “Not who we think he is”, printed on the inside, implying a connection between Obama and terrorism.

Other McCain campaign members accuse Obama of not being who he claims to be at rallies around the country. Robocalls now link Obama with domestic terrorism, and suggests that he opposes mandatory sentencing of sex offenders.  In an era when the nation's fear of terrorism is palpable, the strategy may be a great success. Who will win this election? And will we ever learn from the past?


Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.



News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport