facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Sorry, no featured properties currently.

- Advertisement -
 

« Reason

Texas-sized hypocrisy

By Tyler S. Clark (Contact)


Published April 21, 2009

An old college friend of mine asked me last week if I had attended a Tea Party. The first I heard about these was on Tax Day itself, which clearly means I don't watch enough cable news

The movement — if that’s what it is — was spawned by a rant on Feb. 19 from the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange during a live report by the CNBC reporter — if that’s what he is — Rick Santelli, suggesting that it was time to organize a “tea party” to protest government spending on failed mortgages.
The cable news networks took it from there. Fox News, after running more than 100 promos about its coverage of the event, which did a pretty effective job of marketing them at the same time, had wall-to-wall coverage on the anointed day and dispatched four of its leading hosts around the country to perform a kind of hybrid task, covering events that they also seemed to be leading.

My friend gushed about his experience, "I felt like part of history. Almost like you could roll the clock back 225 years and see the colonists assembling." Back then, the media were fiercely partisan, framing the day's news in terms of ideological leaning, so the comparison may be very appropriate indeed.

I have become exhausted by the talking heads, and I have watched very little news since the inauguration. It's just hard to get pumped up about the news when it's all about the miserable economy; and when it's not, it's this faux populism of the likes of Glenn Beck and Rick Santelli. Populism in pursuit of ratings, not politics.

If the goal were pure political progress, then the Republicans would have been crying foul for the last eight years while more money than has been dreamed of in President Obama's stimulus was poured down the drain of war in the Middle East.

And in Texas, Governor Rick Perry praised the assembled throng in Austin, whose cries of "Secede!" found no rebuke.

Afterward, he told reporters that Texas had come into the union with a unique right “to leave if we decided to do that.” This is a beloved piece of state folklore despite its unfortunate drawback of being totally untrue. 

Haven't we been hearing for the last eight years how we need to support the troops by supporting America and the President? I guess that was just if he was a Texan, and GOP, and named Bush.

So, spare me the rhetoric about bureaucratic spending. I'd rather spend a trillion dollars at home than abroad. Sure, it would be nice if we didn't have to spend anything, but when no one is spending, that's when the government has to fill the gap.

Just ask Alexander Hamilton; he would've understood. 


Comments

1ochi56(30 comments)posted 5 years, 8 months ago

Tyler; you are 110% right about this staged TEA PARTY; for Fox Cable it's all about the ratings. I do agree we are over due for a second revolution. We need to abolish the "Income Tax". 'We the People' are paying income tax on a VOLUNTARY basis. THERE IS NO LAW THAT STATES WE MUST PAY. THE IRS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!!
Google 'American Fascism' by the late Aaron Russo.
Remember; 'It takes a Revolution to create a Solution.'
PS;
Isn't that one of the reasons why Jim Traficant was "Politically Linched" !!!!!!!!

Suggest removal:

2cityguy(109 comments)posted 5 years, 8 months ago

I agree with the point about media, but I'm more bothered by the "objective" outlets than the clearly partisan ones. CNN for example follows the tired format of having two ideologically opposed talking heads argue over an issue; both spout half truths and party lines and the "journalists" make no attempt to differentiate which is telling the truth--"debate" has become the substitute for actual fact-finding and in the long run democracy suffers.

Suggest removal:

3apollo(1227 comments)posted 5 years, 8 months ago

A common falsehood of the right wing is that 40% of people do not pay income tax. He even claimed that he piad taxes when he was making little money.

The fact is the people not paying "INCOME TAX" are paying nearly 15% in medicare and social security taxes which are in effect the same as income taxes since they go to pay the largest expenditures in the budget.

Of course Clark paid "INCOME TAXES" back when he worked for little money but his medicare and social security taxes were much smaller too.

The fact is anyone with a job that has any of the taxes taken out pays INCOME TAX and at rates sometimes much higher than the wealthy who derive much of their incomes from capital gains.

Suggest removal:

4andersonathan(671 comments)posted 5 years, 8 months ago

Well for one Obama has spent more in less than 100 days than GWB did in eight years. And that includes the war.

The interest alone on what he is spending will be pasted on to newborns today most likely years after collage and into their 30's and for what? More Corruption? The lining of pockets? Future votes? health care that has never worked any place all that effective? Having the rich to pay for it or is taxing anyone with a job to pay for it? And believe Obama is not done by a long shot in spending or taxing.

As i sit here writing checks to the utilities companies. not only for my place but for my apartment rentals. yes I offer paid utilities. i wonder if this cap on carbon will force me to stop offering that. When utilities have to bid on permits, permits that some say will be open to everyone, and that means the likes of G.Soros and any billionaire wanting to get into the energy game or other companies all in a open bidding war. I sit and wonder how much of the bottom dollar is going to be passed to me and my bill.

D. Axelrod said today it is bad right now to bring up anti Americanism in the form of protest and tea parties. Some celeb said it was because their is a black man in the White House. maybe they have slept through the past 8 years and woke up in the midst of the New Clinton Administration and only because most of Carters cabinet is either dead or banned from DC. Or should be banned.

If anything Tea Parties did bring over 700 cities and a few hundred thousand people together for a cause. Not to protest Obama and some did. Not to protest democrats or republicans and some did. But people have had enough. Seriously we as a whole have had enough of every one's spending, Taxes, future debt.

I hear it everyday "The last 8 Years" "GWB" wah wah wah. Well you know what my money grew it grew a lot in the last eight years and i pulled out before the peak of the market and never going back into it. i am sorry for GM workers Lear workers Delphi workers but seriously how many years do you think we can continually to pay big wages, big benefits, and big pensions with out a crash. Your finding out right?

All those homes I used to work on in Akron and Cleveland developments the 250k and up homes when the Tech boom was booming. Kids were buying them out of collage that's how easy it was to buy a new home in the mid 90's. Now some are bailout roads.

Things change and Obama is not the answer, neither is spending the way out of it. If anyone does anything today check out D.Feinstein and her hubby and tell me when and where the next party is.
Not that I won't know already. I will be there loud and strong in American pride knowing I still live in a Christian Nation wither or not obama does.

Suggest removal:

5Nonsocialist(710 comments)posted 5 years, 8 months ago

President Bush 43 was irresponsible to have promoted and signed passage of an unaffordable prescription drug program, tax "rebates" and TARP bailouts. But clearly, comparing his shortcomings to Obama's financial radicalism is like comparing a parking violation to homicide.

Last fiscal year, the deficit was $459 billion. For this fiscal year, it was $569 billion when Mr. Obama took office. Under his proposals, another $1.276 trillion will be added to the deficit this year, for a total of $1.845 trillion.

The CBO says deficits will fall for three years to $658 billion, still nearly 50% larger than any past deficit. After that, deficits go back up every year, reaching the trillion-dollar a year mark again in nine years. By 2019, the debt would reach 82.4% of GDP, a level not seen since 1947.

Federal spending will under Mr. Obama top $4 trillion this year. This translates into 28.5% of GDP -- a level exceeded only at the height of World War II.

Alexander Hamilton endorsed some aspects of a strong central government. He was not a socialist. He did not advocate punishing productivty and rewarding sloth. He did not support vote-buying indirectly (entitlements) or directly (ACORN). His positions regarding protectionism are now accepted as detrimental.

Regarding seceding from the union, would you oppose it? Maybe you'd no longer have to deal with the conservatives and their outdated ideas about the American Dream, virtues and personal responsibility.

Suggest removal:

6andersonathan(671 comments)posted 5 years, 8 months ago

I don't have a problem with conservatives and Texas will not succeed from the Union. I am proud that some one as in Mr. Perry has the coins to stand up and say hey enough is enough

True it is bad enough we have to pay W' [43] bills, but 44's additions is going to end up in calamity on the horizon.

I must add a idea that I hope dwindles and fades away. Their are congressmen and ladies who want to liquefy your 401k, possible your IRA and maybe pensions. Into what is basically a sister account to S.S. It is estimated that there is as little as 3 trillion in 401K's and up to 10 trillion if you take it to pensions. It was squashed by everyone before the election of 08, re-arose in December and has been quiet since then. The markets do not like the idea and could not handle the blow [right now] So i just want to say it is a very slippery slope we are on. And we all know what happens when they say we will not dip into S.S.

Suggest removal:

7valleyred(1100 comments)posted 5 years, 8 months ago

O gimme a break. Here you damn liberals go again with the belief that Fox staged these things. WRONG. Jim Shaw planned the one in Youngstown, NOT Fox News. Justin Higgins of Brookfield, OH helped plan the one in Columbus, NOT Fox News.

And o by the way, it is Rick Santelli of the far left NBC Family of Networks that is the inspiration behind these.

I criticized Bush for spending too much and I am going to criticize Obama for spending even more than Bush did.

Suggest removal:

8andersonathan(671 comments)posted 5 years, 8 months ago

Anderson, personally I wish the idea of partial privatization of SS would be brought up now. First, the introduction of trillions of dollars into the markets could be at a better time. Secondly, if people have the ability to choose where their money flows, in this market its a (potentially) great time to buy. Yes, there is downside, that is why I would favor only a 25% cap on SS funds being used this way.

You missed the whole point Some Democrats want to take it and put it in the federal government control and eliminate the opportunity for investing. Google Obama 401K

Suggest removal:

9apollo(1227 comments)posted 5 years, 8 months ago

Rick Santelli of the far left CNBC??? LOL. CNBC is a mouthpiece of the right ValleyRed. Maybe if you watched it, you know.

Suggest removal:

10Nonsocialist(710 comments)posted 5 years, 8 months ago

ERPLANE,

I believe you're letting your contempt of President Bush cloud your reasoning. Of course President Bush spent way too much money that our children will have to sort out, if they can. But do you dispute that the amount being spent by President Obama and Congress dwarfs what was spent under Bush 43? Read the facts in my entry above and tell me which of those facts are erroneous.

Suggest removal:

11valleyred(1100 comments)posted 5 years, 8 months ago

As a finance major at Youngstown State, I watch CNBC every single day to get my market news and information. With that being said, CNBC is part of the far left NBC Network.

Any business student studying capitalism in their courses right now cannot be a liberal, at least on economic issues. Hence the reason they appear to be so conservative. I am sure on social issues, they may be pretty damn liberal however.

Suggest removal:

12apollo(1227 comments)posted 5 years, 7 months ago

ValleyRed, CNBC is about as far right as any cable station can be. Reporters like Larry Kudlow, who was part of Republican economic teams and others on CNBC are a mouthpiece for Republican policies. To even claim that they are left wing shows your complete lack of logic.

Suggest removal:



News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes