I don't hate these people and the fact that I don't want their lifestyle shoved down my throat does not make me intolerant...
People doing the wrong thing need to have it pointed out to them or all of society will crumble.
November 11, 2013 at 9:32 a.m.
I know the Vindicator has made the decision to publish these homosexual wedding announcements, but this practice is offensive to me and I am sure - to many others.
These two people don't even live here anymore. To what purpose is this announcement except to advance the homosexual agenda?
Laws cannot change to legitimize these unions - just as abortion cannot be justified because it is now legal.
I do not wish these two women any harm - but to they have to flaunt their perverse lifestyle in the paper?
November 11, 2013 at 3:10 a.m.
It is completely ridiculous to have women in combat. Captured women will be raped and the men left behind know that - making their capture trigger a different set of responses - detrimental to the military as a whole.
January 25, 2013 at 4:47 a.m.
I am appalled that Obama mentioned "gay marriage" in this speech.
He is just pandering to people who have no right to consider their unions "marriages." It's not only asinine, it's just plain sick. I don't care what the "law says" in these crazy states.
Our society was founded on families - with one mother, one father and children.
Obama should be promoting that.
January 23, 2013 at 11:19 a.m.
Anyone can make an allegation. What about the concept of innocent until proven guilty? This lady obviously has an ax to grind and the Vindy gives her front page coverage. Ridiculous!
I understand that the Bishop is to make a public statement this week.
I hope the paper gives his response the same type of coverage as Ms. Jones got today.
January 23, 2013 at 11:11 a.m.
As an avowed atheist, it's no surprise that you support the oftentimes anti-Christian ACLU.
Whatever good this organization does is negated by being against Almighty God.
When did you become an atheist and why?
January 19, 2013 at 6:09 a.m.
Generalizations can be just as credible as specific statements. You lose.
January 9, 2013 at 9:02 a.m.
I've seen your comments before.
You seem to love attacking a person's "credibility" when you don't agree with his opinions, yet your anti-credibility arguments lack credibility to people who believe a writer's opinions.
Although I don't agree with Joe's assertion that the Democrats are like Nazis because of their attitude towards the "rich," they ARE like Nazis because of their attitude towards abortion.
You seem yourself to be a "one trick pony," Mr. Anti-Credibility. Better get a new criticism.
January 9, 2013 at 4:58 a.m.
This is the most asinine story I've heard in a long time.
January 7, 2013 at 4:29 p.m.
There are difficult standards of what you can own, how much in assets you can have, and in how much income you make.
I know of a young man who is autistic, but works part-time as a custodian. He makes about $6000/year, has less than $1500 in assets and owns virtually no property.
He also receives social security, and is on medicaid and has a food stamp card (on which he gets the grand total of $16/month).
Would anyone want to trade places with him?
January 6, 2013 at 8:37 a.m.