facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Poland


Residential
5 bedroom, 6 bath
$395000


Poland


Residential
4 bedroom, 7 bath
$899900


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Comment history

Kokrak returns for major PGA test

Good Luck Jason, glad to see you back.

August 6, 2014 at 11:54 a.m. suggest removal

Austintown racino hires seven managers

LOL so marketing a restaurant qualifies you to run the slots? Name me 1 industry that doesnt look for people in THAT industry in director positions? or is 1 industry the same as all other industries? they hired 7 people, the place will employ 1000, perspective is great

May 11, 2014 at 9:13 a.m. suggest removal

Connelly: Experts like Kokrak’s game

LMAO you never whined about your team losing? Never questioned effort? Your not a browns fan are you?

March 27, 2014 at 12:14 p.m. suggest removal

Findings unavailable for spat between Austintown superintendent and board member

'Just a good Ol' Boys never meanin no harm, been in trouble with law since the day they was born'

Uncle Jed err Doc Ritchie went and old Bo errr I mean Vince C that Boss Hog errrr Harold P was picking on him.

waaaaa waaaaaa waaaa

March 25, 2014 at 5:49 a.m. suggest removal

Youngstown air base to lose 773rd squadron

Thats just about the dumbest comment I have read on here and I have read some dumb comments

February 28, 2014 at 2:37 p.m. suggest removal

Penn National agrees to meet with Youngstown and Austintown

yes Youngstown can hold them hostage for water. but then Penn can walk now cant they? Dont think they will? Thats what the racing commission thought, that bluff was called and they backed down. How many other companies have left because of the 'water game'? Let's keep acting as we have in the past that these enterprises need us more than we need them, shall we? Really worked well in the past hasnt it?

July 10, 2013 at 12:43 p.m. suggest removal

Penn National agrees to meet with Youngstown and Austintown

There will be no JEDD, get over it. Lisa Oles wont vote for it and if it goes to the vote of the residents, Austintown will never pass it.

It is a money grab by Youngstown where they have no right to it.

The purpose of a JEDD is for a Twp and a City to work together pooling resources together to attract new business. That is they form the JEDD on unincorporated undeveloped land each sharing in the burden of devloping the land for use such as adding roads and infrastructure using the authority of the city for which Twp doesnt have to attract new business that otherwise wouldnt be here.

The racino is coming it here without the JEDD 0 benfit to the TWP and 0 burden on the City so it is a clear money grab by the city, 1 mil in taxes - 0 expense = all profit for the city. JEDD for it to be a worthwhile adventure means both entities share in the burden.

Before someone says "well Austintown would get a portion of the income tax so they make out" this is true, but the other half of the story is they would lose property tax money by the constitution. The presence of an income tax changes the formula of inside millage reducing the amount Austintown would receive.

July 10, 2013 at 12:39 p.m. suggest removal

Politics stalling Austintown racino, county Dems say

what Mark? someone didnt put enough "grease" in your pockets? I vote Mark Munroe pay the valley back every penny lost when Penn walks away like every other company does when confronted with Ohio Politics

March 29, 2013 at 11:55 a.m. suggest removal

Limited gun restrictions don’t violate the Second Amendment

no my point is this, doing something for the sake of saying you did something is really doing nothing. To me this si what this gun law is, much ado but solves nothing.

I wish I could say I knew the answer, but I do know it is a combination of policies and actions that work in conjunction with each other plus it would not hurt if we came together as a united country rther than a divided one we are now

March 24, 2013 at 7:48 p.m. suggest removal

Limited gun restrictions don’t violate the Second Amendment

I agree if you could keep them from getting the guns. I just dont see how this law will keep the guns from their hands, which is my point. If it would rights or no rights, pass the law and save the kids. I just dont think that it would keep the guns out of the gunman hands, it would just change the means by which they acquire the guns I am afraid.

March 21, 2013 at 1:25 p.m. suggest removal

Previous

News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport