To get to the merits of the case the SC fond the mandate was not a tax. Then to save the mandate the SC found the mandate was a tax. For the first time in our history the federal government can force a person to engage in commerce or pay a tax for not engaging in commerce. If this stands our Republic is lost.
If your reference is to Dr. Thomas Sowell (Phd in economics and author of such books as 'Migration and Culture' and 'Economics 101' {to name a few}), you would do well to read what Dr. Sowell has to say and learn from it. The knowledge Dr. Sowell imparts may shine a little light of truth into the dark hole you have buried your head.
(A) No person, with purpose to hinder the discovery, apprehension, prosecution, conviction, or punishment of another for crime or to assist another to benefit from the commission of a crime, and . . . . . . . shall do any of the following:
(1) Harbor or conceal the other person or child;
(2) Provide the other person or child with money, transportation, a weapon, a disguise, or other means of avoiding discovery or apprehension;
(3) Warn the other person or child of impending discovery or apprehension;
(4) Destroy or conceal physical evidence of the crime or act, or induce any person to withhold testimony or information or to elude legal process summoning the person to testify or supply evidence;
(5) Communicate false information to any person;
What about Obstructing Justice, Houser was with the "real killer".
Palestinians political prisoners? Palestinians political leadership refuses to recognizes Israels right to exist, has vowed to wipe Israel off the map, and teaches their children to hate Jews. And the Palestinian Authority reserves millions from the United States in aid. The atrocity is that the U.S. taxes fund this organization that wants to destroy Israel.
As for prisons wanting good behavior to count toward lowering their security level (risk), too bad, should have thought about that before engaging in their violent acts.
AAC. Judges in Ohio are elected officials, as such they our topical affiliated with a political party, however the party affiliation is not permitted on the ballot. That's why on a ballot in a contested race only the name of the candidate for judge appears.
Marriage through out recorded human history was always been b/w men and women. Our Constitution requires our society be tolerant of opposing points of view. What one group finds morally objectionable, provided it is not illegal, must be tolerated. Their is a difference b/w tolerance and acceptance.
I think the majority of people who are opposed to redefining marriage have no problem with same sex civil unions. But the pro gay crowd reject this compromise and want to redefine marriage and every other social norm b/c they, the pro gay crowd, want homosexuality to be considered normal and acceptable behavior. The pro gays attack any opposing point of view with piss and vinegar demonstrating their intolerance.
Christianity requires a believe in the axiom "love the sinner, hate the sin."
Gay activists pushed for the redefining of marriage, civil unions were not enough, marriage had to be redefined. The public pushed back and now 33 States have Constitutional amendments to their State Constitutions defining marriage as a union b/w one man and one woman. The Federal defense of marriage act defines marriage as a "union b/w one man and one woman."
Putting a misstatement in context
There is nothing anti-gay in believing that the definition of marriage should not be changed.
August 16, 2012 at 2:49 p.m. permalink suggest removal
What you should know about the ruling upholding the Affordable Care Act
To get to the merits of the case the SC fond the mandate was not a tax. Then to save the mandate the SC found the mandate was a tax. For the first time in our history the federal government can force a person to engage in commerce or pay a tax for not engaging in commerce. If this stands our Republic is lost.
June 29, 2012 at 3:39 p.m. permalink suggest removal
Tom Sowell forgets his history
John,
If your reference is to Dr. Thomas Sowell (Phd in economics and author of such books as 'Migration and Culture' and 'Economics 101' {to name a few}), you would do well to read what Dr. Sowell has to say and learn from it. The knowledge Dr. Sowell imparts may shine a little light of truth into the dark hole you have buried your head.
June 24, 2012 at 4:04 p.m. permalink suggest removal
BREAKING NEWS: Murder charges dropped against Jamar Houser in 2010 shooting death
Ohio revised Code 2923.03 Complicity.
(A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following:
(2) Aid or abet another in committing the offense;
if your with someone acting as a look out and they commit an offense, your as guilty as they are.
If you aid the principal offender by concealing their identity or involvement, your complicit.
Ohio Revised code section 2921.32 Obstructing justice.
(A) No person, with purpose to hinder the discovery, apprehension, prosecution, conviction, or punishment of another for crime or to assist another to benefit from the commission of a crime, and . . . . . . . shall do any of the following:
(1) Harbor or conceal the other person or child;
(2) Provide the other person or child with money, transportation, a weapon, a disguise, or other means of avoiding discovery or apprehension;
(3) Warn the other person or child of impending discovery or apprehension;
(4) Destroy or conceal physical evidence of the crime or act, or induce any person to withhold testimony or information or to elude legal process summoning the person to testify or supply evidence;
(5) Communicate false information to any person;
What about Obstructing Justice, Houser was with the "real killer".
May 24, 2012 at 6:28 p.m. permalink suggest removal
Warren, Youngstown urged to cooperate in fighting crime
Tolerate crime and we will get more crime.
May 22, 2012 at 6:30 p.m. permalink suggest removal
Terminated and frustrated
ridicules.
May 20, 2012 at 10:19 p.m. permalink suggest removal
Hunger strike ends at prison
Palestinians political prisoners? Palestinians political leadership refuses to recognizes Israels right to exist, has vowed to wipe Israel off the map, and teaches their children to hate Jews. And the Palestinian Authority reserves millions from the United States in aid. The atrocity is that the U.S. taxes fund this organization that wants to destroy Israel.
As for prisons wanting good behavior to count toward lowering their security level (risk), too bad, should have thought about that before engaging in their violent acts.
May 15, 2012 at 5:18 p.m. permalink suggest removal
Gov. Kasich to appoint successor to Douglas
AAC. Judges in Ohio are elected officials, as such they our topical affiliated with a political party, however the party affiliation is not permitted on the ballot. That's why on a ballot in a contested race only the name of the candidate for judge appears.
May 13, 2012 at 9:24 p.m. permalink suggest removal
Former Valley pair applauds Obama’s gay marriage stance
Marriage through out recorded human history was always been b/w men and women. Our Constitution requires our society be tolerant of opposing points of view. What one group finds morally objectionable, provided it is not illegal, must be tolerated. Their is a difference b/w tolerance and acceptance.
I think the majority of people who are opposed to redefining marriage have no problem with same sex civil unions. But the pro gay crowd reject this compromise and want to redefine marriage and every other social norm b/c they, the pro gay crowd, want homosexuality to be considered normal and acceptable behavior. The pro gays attack any opposing point of view with piss and vinegar demonstrating their intolerance.
Christianity requires a believe in the axiom "love the sinner, hate the sin."
May 12, 2012 at 12:43 a.m. permalink suggest removal
Former Valley pair applauds Obama’s gay marriage stance
Gay activists pushed for the redefining of marriage, civil unions were not enough, marriage had to be redefined. The public pushed back and now 33 States have Constitutional amendments to their State Constitutions defining marriage as a union b/w one man and one woman. The Federal defense of marriage act defines marriage as a "union b/w one man and one woman."
May 10, 2012 at 11:18 a.m. permalink suggest removal