We need to stop buying so many items from China and start opening companies in America so people have jobs in this country. Raising the costs of crude is not helping this recession and costs of all petroleum products need to be reduced. Gas / diesel fuel / heating fuels down to $1.00 a gallon with a 50 % reduction in all other petroleum products. Chinese governing officials also buy investments in crude oil is it so they can double dip ? Need to start pumping all of that Alaskian pipeline oil into America at a very low cost for all taxpayers whom paid to have it installed !!
In large cities many parents have chosen to home school or use charter schools or use Christian and private schools because cities did little to nothing about behavior problems with children whom have not been taught by parents and teachers / administrators have been informed by laws that these children can't be disciplined. When children continue to disrupt classrooms daily other children find it difficult to learn. Step it a right direction to help children learn better behavior at an alternative school. Posted by Kareen
Property values have been put to the very lowest they will reach with the mortgage crisis and with the recession. Many politicians have said that property taxes should be considered unconstitutional do to false info, people on welfare programs and those whom have several children by several different marriages that everyone else has to pay for. Those whom do not need officers or ambulatory services and those whom have no children living at their residence is a prime example of unconstitutional. That is a small amount of explanation which has been spoken about by those in the political career. There are several more valid reason for unconstitutional including job loss, reevaluation loss, damages by weather and the list goes on. Posted by Tera
This is one of the most greediest type of saying we want to have customers reduce energy which in reality is only a way to make mega funds for the company. Why should customers use just First Energy bulbs at so much a month when customers can buy better bulbs at a much lesser cost? Are in persons who work in management of the First Energy Company smarter than a fifth grader who figured out 3 ways for homeowners to conserve energy? Posted by Toni
We changed every bulb in the house to fluorescent 2 years ago and should not have to pay any company for sending bulbs which are not needed. People should have a choice of what bulb to have in their house not dictated by a company who wants to have only their bulbs in people's houses. Posted by Tera
Wonderful idea after we have put in 22 fluorescent lights bulbs at an expense we do not want to have to spend a second time because these lights are capable of last 7 years plus. It is time for companies to stop demanding customers must do this or that when in reality it truthfully would not be necessary for many people especially the elderly !! Posted by Derick
If you all ready have the fluorescent light bulbs you should not have to pay a second time to have these First Energy Bulbs at a higher cost than people can afford to pay. We also find that more expensive bulbs have a smaller time frame and have to be replaced more often so we use a lesser costing fluorescent light bulb which has lasted over 6 years. Posted by Derick
Many of these workers have put in 30 years or more of their lives paying medical care for those on welfare, illegal aliens, and most all politicians who have the best health care money can afford. Would it not be more fair that people who have worked all their lives get FREE health care after paying for everyone elses?? Posted by Jarad
Hope that they don't increase homeowners property taxes to put in this septic at 25% means the people who live in these counties may lose their homes so that they can build and construct either business district or new housing which should be stopped now by making sure these owners keep their homes by making the amount they have to pay only 5% of their property taxes or find another way to pay for the new septic systems. Posted by Thomas
Posted on November 11 at 4:06 p.m.
We need to stop buying so many items from China and start opening companies in America so people have jobs in this country. Raising the costs of crude is not helping this recession and costs of all petroleum products need to be reduced. Gas / diesel fuel / heating fuels down to $1.00 a gallon with a 50 % reduction in all other petroleum products. Chinese governing officials also buy investments in crude oil is it so they can double dip ? Need to start pumping all of that Alaskian pipeline oil into America at a very low cost for all taxpayers whom paid to have it installed !!
Posted on November 9 at 5:22 p.m.
In large cities many parents have chosen to home school or use charter schools or use Christian and private schools because cities did little to nothing about behavior problems with children whom have not been taught by parents and teachers / administrators have been informed by laws that these children can't be disciplined. When children continue to disrupt classrooms daily other children find it difficult to learn. Step it a right direction to help children learn better behavior at an alternative school.
Posted by Kareen
Posted on October 18 at 5:38 p.m.
Property values have been put to the very lowest they will reach with the mortgage crisis and with the recession. Many politicians have said that property taxes should be considered unconstitutional do to false info, people on welfare programs and those whom have several children by several different marriages that everyone else has to pay for. Those whom do not need officers or ambulatory services and those whom have no children living at their residence is a prime example of unconstitutional. That is a small amount of explanation which has been spoken about by those in the political career. There are several more valid reason for unconstitutional including job loss, reevaluation loss, damages by weather and the list goes on. Posted by Tera
Posted on October 14 at 10:27 p.m.
This is one of the most greediest type of saying we want to have customers reduce energy which in reality is only a way to make mega funds for the company. Why should customers use just First Energy bulbs at so much a month when customers can buy better bulbs at a much lesser cost? Are in persons who work in management of the First Energy Company smarter than a fifth grader who figured out 3 ways for homeowners to conserve energy?
Posted by Toni
Posted on October 13 at 9:19 p.m.
We changed every bulb in the house to fluorescent 2 years ago and should not have to pay any company for sending bulbs which are not needed. People should have a choice of what bulb to have in their house not dictated by a company who wants to have only their bulbs in people's houses. Posted by Tera
Posted on October 8 at 6:14 p.m.
Wonderful idea after we have put in 22 fluorescent lights bulbs at an expense we do not want to have to spend a second time because these lights are capable of last 7 years plus. It is time for companies to stop demanding customers must do this or that when in reality it truthfully would not be necessary for many people especially the elderly !! Posted by Derick
Posted on October 7 at 6:08 p.m.
If you all ready have the fluorescent light bulbs you should not have to pay a second time to have these First Energy Bulbs at a higher cost than people can afford to pay. We also find that more expensive bulbs have a smaller time frame and have to be replaced more often so we use a lesser costing fluorescent light bulb which has lasted over 6 years. Posted by Derick
Posted on September 30 at 8:31 p.m.
Many of these workers have put in 30 years or more of their lives paying medical care for those on welfare, illegal aliens, and most all politicians who have the best health care money can afford. Would it not be more fair that people who have worked all their lives get FREE health care after paying for everyone elses?? Posted by Jarad
Posted on September 30 at 6:04 p.m.
Just another price for someone to sit on their duffs of do nothing and collect a paycheck. Posted by Teri
Posted on September 22 at 2:22 p.m.
Hope that they don't increase homeowners property taxes to put in this septic at 25% means the people who live in these counties may lose their homes so that they can build and construct either business district or new housing which should be stopped now by making sure these owners keep their homes by making the amount they have to pay only 5% of their property taxes or find another way to pay for the new septic systems. Posted by Thomas