Former: The headline for the online edition of Vindy for this story was indeed in error (but correct in the print edition). You have a choice when you see a mistake: You can rant about conspiracies or you can bring it to our attention.
In either case, when we spot a legitimate error, we correct it.
Since you begged the question, "Can you image a Wall Street Journal or Washington Post article headline containing such an obvious mistake?" I am including a link to Poynter's best/worst corrections of 2013 to satisfy your inquiry.
But be careful about demanding perfection: You misspelled Dave Betras' name.
Mark SweetwoodManaging Editor
March 7, 2014 at 8:18 a.m.
Over: So, The Vindicator needs to stop thoroughly checking out and reporting on stories about teacher conduct - allowing all sides a chance to weigh in - but you think it is OK to make unsubstantiated, one-sided claims about teachers while hiding behind an anonymous persona? Really?
For the record, your claim of who contacted The Vindicator is completely wrong, calling into question everything else in your post.
February 10, 2014 at 11:51 a.m.
You mean a story like this:
January 8, 2014 at 7:58 a.m.
The bad headline has been fixed.
October 23, 2013 at 1:37 p.m.
This story was published at 12:01 a.m., more than 12 hours before any plan was announced. Not sure how that is "a day late and a dollar short." Plus, nothing has been voted on yet so the article and its reporting still stand as a a sound report as to what could happen. Many of us will believe a plan has passed when we see it...
October 16, 2013 at 3:37 p.m.
For all of those reasons, before you count words and post insults and definitive conclusions, perhaps check under "sports" on the home page and direct yourself here:
October 14, 2013 at 5:43 p.m.
If you were more "adroit" and less "ailierdroit" you might have caught Connelly's main piece on the Peace Race on B1 of Sports.
Maybe be a little more careful before you go off on someone, OK?
October 14, 2013 at 11:04 a.m.
You gotta love posts like the ones from Author50. To just have that essential grasp of key facts without the messy, complicated need for, say, I don't know, even a Google search that might, let's say, deliver results like this in 0.34 seconds:
There's more, but you get the point.
October 9, 2013 at 10:19 a.m.
Wow. Conspiracy theories about a story that was broken by The Vindicator. Of course we would be in on covering up the very story we broke, right?
There were a couple of random stories that were impacted by online glitches today that were remedied mid-morning. Sorry, Snoop Sisters, but that's all that happened.
Beyond that, I can't legitimately address the silliness of Johny and Silence because to do so would mean that I would have to be polite and pretend they could actually fashion "legitimate" questions.
October 3, 2013 at 5:58 p.m.
Hey Johny R: You must be confusing yesterday's story with the follow-up story posted today.
Yesterday's story is still available on Vindy.com. Go here:
Dave is the reporter who broke the story. Was that the point to your inquiry?
October 3, 2013 at 2:49 p.m.