Sorry, no featured properties currently.
At least Barb signed her name. I give her credit for that. That being said it also allows you to search her home on the auditor’s website. A couple clicks reveals she lives in a home with a market value over $248,000, and it is paid off. At some point in her life she made a decent enough buck and certainly can afford to support the children of her community. If in fact she is near retirement (assuming she’s not retiring at age 50) she’ll also qualify for the homestead reduction at some point in the life of the levy. While it won’t cover the tax increase for a home worth as much as hers, it at least should make it manageable.
October 20, 2012 at 11:37 a.m.
Likewise we're allowed to disagree with you and want what's best for our kids. You're allowed to think something is wrong and allowed to take steps to resolve those issues. For each person who feels there is a problem there are plenty of us who feel our kids get a great, well rounded, excellent education. We also feel it and our teachers are worth paying for and don't mind the money that is being spent. My point is voting no on a levy doesn't solve the problems you feel exist. As for moving it's the age old if you think the grass is greener - go. It seldom is. I'm certainly allowed to make the suggestion. It's within my right.
As for comparisons, at what point were comparisons to national averages made? I heard plenty of local and state comparisons.
Really many of us are just tired of your same old complaints that hold little value when looked at rationally. Honestly this back and forth banter on a message board solves very little. Hopefully someone with common sense comes across you at a social setting and you're open minded enough to listen.
I know you'll vote no. You'll get what you deserve. Sadly my kids will get it right along with you. I guess I can always move. Right?
September 27, 2012 at 6:12 p.m.
While you may have some facts your thinking is skewed. You hear what you want and refuse to hear anything else. There are MANY facts and figures you fail to hear because they don't fit your agenda. Like always I hope rational people would hear everything before they form their opinion and not just base it on the half truths you continually spew. That horse is dead. BTW I have one word for people like you - MOVE!
September 27, 2012 at 4:49 p.m.
Truly scary that we have to even involve the government in feeding our kids. Sure there are those that need a helping hand. Clearly this is more than a helping hand. Even scarier to me is that we have to have government entities to explain, check and require that a lunch is healthy. Have we really become such lemmings that we can't determine or provide that for ourselves or our kids? Scary.
September 19, 2012 at 8:28 p.m.
This isn't about kids. It's about money. Someone will be making a ton of it. Think the tests that show a students reading level or lack there of are free? Follow the money and you'll have your answer. Testing is big bucks and someone is raking it in - at your and our children's expense.
September 4, 2012 at 5:15 p.m.
Majority? Say honest.
June 18, 2012 at 6:14 p.m.
Great use of time and money investigating that. What a waste!
June 18, 2012 at 6:10 p.m.
That response again is typical, but not any where near the reality. I'm only asking because you said you understand school funding.
June 17, 2012 at 2:01 p.m.
Pretty much the response I expected. Anyone else?
June 16, 2012 at 4:33 p.m.
So if you understand school funding, explain why a district such as say Campbell or Struthers that pays their teachers on average the same as Poland along with similar benefits packages and newer schools and even a newer stadium in Campbell doesn’t have similar financial issues.
June 16, 2012 at 8:25 a.m.