fool- I was specifically talking about my nick. You see, I AM kk80586. It has a meaning to me and anyone else who uses it is an impostor or an extreme coincidence. I have had several people (always the lib/prog type) try to do that to my nick for many, many years. Yet they can NEVER find a racist statement made by me (typical lib). I even made a deal with one guy that if he could find anything racist in my post history that I would change my nick to kkk80586. I AM kk80586 and no racist lib can project his racism onto me :) As far as demoKKKrat and republiKKKan... that also was started years ago by the libs projecting their racism onto republicans. Now, I sometimes show racist libs that others can do that with the word "democrat" also.And for henry's info- I am NOT republican but I will NEVER again vote for a democrat after the last dozen years unless they first prove they are above "towing the line". eivo got kicked off the site? I'd sure like to know what for. I know he skates the edges sometimes but I had never seen anything bad enough to get booted for.Hey eivo, you out there? Gimme the scoop :)
June 17, 2014 at 4:41 p.m.
You can always tell the racists/race-baiters... they always want to add an extra "K" where none exists. Poor little henry has no valid point to make, no facts on his side so all he can do is call names and throw feces.
June 17, 2014 at 6:32 a.m.
henry - lol@u why do all the demoKKKrats want to defend berg so strongly when all the available evidence points to the fact he deserted his post and possibly collaborated with the taliban? Why can no one have an opinion that does not match yours? The guy must be a traitor or you would not stick up for him so hard. "Leave Bergdahl alone. It's no one's business but God's to figure out."I'm sure God already has it figured out. In fact, it appears that only you and a few others are totally clueless."kk80586, I hope the NSA has a nice thick file on you."I wouldn't mind, there's nothing I've ever done against my Country. If it makes you feel any better, the FBI does in fact have my fingerprints on file at least a couple times...
June 16, 2014 at 11:17 p.m.
henry - does theonion know you plagiarize their stuff??
June 15, 2014 at 11:10 a.m.
henry speaks for God!! --- "Chief178...yes, i'm sure you "served"...but in the eyes of God, you are unfit to shine Bergdahl's boots. - See more at: http://www.vindy.com/news/2014/jun/07...
Let's see....one guy serves honorably and the other tries to cozy up to the taliban and puts the rest of the soldiers in danger... and henry says exactly what you would expect a lemming like henry to say....yes, all is right with the world. Carry on.
June 15, 2014 at 10:59 a.m.
"-Mine would so speak for yourself."go for it....
May 10, 2014 at 10:36 a.m.
drivers busted for dui are like pedophiles.... they both get slapped on the wrist until they kill someone. Then the state might (I say MIGHT) do something that fits the crime. Both ALMOST ALWAYS re-offend.
May 4, 2014 at 10:30 a.m.
Wasn't there a story about a week or so ago that said Yo. was one of the worst cities to live in? So you'd want to raise a family here but just not live here I guess....
April 17, 2014 at 11:56 a.m.
" "Make no law establishing a religion" is lawyer-speak for dummies like you that don't understand the concept of "separation of church and state" "Actually, if you had a clear understanding of the Constitution you would know that "Congress shall make no law establishing a religion" means EXACTLY that congress is forbidden from making any law that some religion is supreme or in control (i.e Church of England).I don't know why you people find it so hard to understand the Constitution. You pretend it is all written in "lawyer-speak" and only lawyers (and you) can interpret it's meaning. I've read through the Constitution a few times in my life and not too long ago I read through it carefully, specifically looking for something difficult to understand because it was written in "lawyer-speak". My finding was that it is written in plain old everyday english and that anyone with an IQ that is one point higher than yours can understand.There is no need to "interpret" the Constitution... just read it. If you need help with the longer words let us know, we can help. "...don't understand the concept of "separation of church and state" "You're right on that...it IS a "concept", does not appear anywhere in the 1st Amendment or even in the whole Constitution, but don't let that stop you. Do some research on your little "concept"... see how it came about only after the Founders were long dead. If you understood the founding of this Country you would easily understand the Constitution.
March 26, 2014 at 7:47 p.m.
@fool - That's right...putin took care of the problem (ukraine) and obozo's bark didn't make one iota of difference. (that is what you meant with that drivel, right?).p.s. maybe YOU should "stfu" ...you might not be thought of as a fool.
February 22, 2014 at 10:27 a.m.