As long as the Vindicator features the type of negativity that is at the core of everything Bertram de sousa writes, the Vindicator does a diservice to the community. No matter the "good" things the Vindicator may do, they are not an antidote for the venom of vindictiveness de sousa spews. I've said it before, I'll say it again: Reading de sousa is like eating a radish. You know it will come up again and again. Reading de sousa is like being taken to the cemetery where the dirt de sousa digs up covers dead politicans and dead issues.
August 13, 2008 at 1:02 a.m.
Did it ever occur to you, Bertram, that McKelvey may have sincerely meant what he said on July 21? Most people believe in letting bygones be bygones. Most people believe in not speaking ill of the dead. You are not one of them.
The caption on your article asks the question, "Is it unfair to assign an ulterior motive." Yes, it is unfair.But that has never stopped you.
August 3, 2008 at 9:24 a.m.
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
July 28, 2008 at 2:15 p.m.
July 27, 2008 at 3:10 a.m.