There is really no way that you were actually "paying" income tax and not getting it all refunded, considering the fact that you stated you received the socialist benefits in society.
You may have "paid" into the tax system, but my guess is that come tax refund time, you received all of your federal plus a little extra.
"The Roe v. Wade decision prompted national debate that continues today. Debated subjects include whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role should be of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the nation into pro-Roe (mostly pro-choice) and anti-Roe (mostly pro-life) camps, and inspiring grassroots activism on both sides."
So, abortion should not be debated in Congress, but it can be stated by the Supreme Court? Doesn't make too much sense to me, but I guess with due process, I mean the lack thereof since the fetus cannot defend itself, it should be someone elses right.
Well, I just read the Bill of Rights, and unless I missed something, I do not see anything about abortion or right to privacy about it in there.
I'll read the Constitution later on and find out what it says about it there.
I don't judge these women who chose to have an abortion. I am anti-abortion as it stands...I just want to know how abortion differs from murder. And, who gets to chose when someone is considered a "human". I think that these wannabe gangbangers riding around in their hoopties, shooting people at will are "in-human", so should we have the right to abort them?
Lastly, your arguments would be much better if you utilized proper english and possibly spell checked before you posted.
Why should the killing of the unborn not be an issue debated by Congress? We have laws against killing other human beings. That being said, I think it is up to debate as to when a fetus is alive as opposed to "unborn".
How can the taking of one human life be different than the taking of another human life?
Oh, I see, the term was "unbiased", not "unbaise"...that's probably why I couldn't find in the dictionary.
Well, I'm glad that you finally cleared that up for me. Now I have to ask you again, dmets, have you read the "unbiased" report that I linked from the Tax Policy Center"?
I would suspect not, because it really does shed light on the tax plans by both candidates.
Let me post this again. I did post this link before the election, but I suppose the "unbaise" people you speak of were those that were promoting "your" candidate's tax plan...
and then make an informed decision...interesting to note are Tables 7 and 8 where there is a breakdown of the income tax structure by both candidates."
Posted on November 26 at 12:36 p.m.
There is really no way that you were actually "paying" income tax and not getting it all refunded, considering the fact that you stated you received the socialist benefits in society.
You may have "paid" into the tax system, but my guess is that come tax refund time, you received all of your federal plus a little extra.
Posted on November 19 at 3:54 p.m.
Stan,
How can you even decipher the mundane drivel flowing through the fingertips of dmets?
That, sir, is an amazing feat
Posted on November 14 at 10:51 a.m.
"The Roe v. Wade decision prompted national debate that continues today. Debated subjects include whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role should be of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the nation into pro-Roe (mostly pro-choice) and anti-Roe (mostly pro-life) camps, and inspiring grassroots activism on both sides."
So, abortion should not be debated in Congress, but it can be stated by the Supreme Court? Doesn't make too much sense to me, but I guess with due process, I mean the lack thereof since the fetus cannot defend itself, it should be someone elses right.
Posted on November 14 at 10:39 a.m.
Well, I just read the Bill of Rights, and unless I missed something, I do not see anything about abortion or right to privacy about it in there.
I'll read the Constitution later on and find out what it says about it there.
I don't judge these women who chose to have an abortion. I am anti-abortion as it stands...I just want to know how abortion differs from murder. And, who gets to chose when someone is considered a "human". I think that these wannabe gangbangers riding around in their hoopties, shooting people at will are "in-human", so should we have the right to abort them?
Lastly, your arguments would be much better if you utilized proper english and possibly spell checked before you posted.
Posted on November 14 at 9:24 a.m.
Why should the killing of the unborn not be an issue debated by Congress? We have laws against killing other human beings. That being said, I think it is up to debate as to when a fetus is alive as opposed to "unborn".
How can the taking of one human life be different than the taking of another human life?
Posted on November 13 at 10:12 a.m.
Oh, I see, the term was "unbiased", not "unbaise"...that's probably why I couldn't find in the dictionary.
Well, I'm glad that you finally cleared that up for me. Now I have to ask you again, dmets, have you read the "unbiased" report that I linked from the Tax Policy Center"?
I would suspect not, because it really does shed light on the tax plans by both candidates.
Posted on November 12 at 3:20 p.m.
dmets...
I still don't know what unbaise means, but that's neither here nor there. Did you happen to read that "unbiased" report in the link I provided?
Posted on November 11 at 8:47 a.m.
dmets,
Let me post this again. I did post this link before the election, but I suppose the "unbaise" people you speak of were those that were promoting "your" candidate's tax plan...
"Let's talk tax plans:
Read the article located at
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedP...
and then make an informed decision...interesting to note are Tables 7 and 8 where there is a breakdown of the income tax structure by both candidates."
Posted on November 4 at 11:41 a.m.
Twenty-one months after he launched his campaign, he allowed, “You know. I feel pretty peaceful ... I gotta say.”
21 months of a 24 month job spent on the campaign trail...welfare at its finest (getting paid to do nothing).
Some things seem to never amaze me!
Posted on November 2 at 8:19 p.m.
Let's talk tax plans:
Read the article located at http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedP...
and then make an informed decision...interesting to note are Tables 7 and 8 where there is a breakdown of the income tax structure by both candidates.