JC makes some good points. Those BLS figures make a big impression. Wow! 50K-60K too many federal employees in Ohio alone, almost always doing what they should not be doing, and not doing what they should.
We should shut down federal, state, county and local governments more often, so we can better appreciate that life goes on quite well without their initiations of force and fraud against innocent citizens going about their personal private business.
October 10, 2013 at 8:21 a.m.
Might've known. Technological development crushed by the bureaubums.
I was once told that postage stamps were adopted in the USA by an abolitionist and somewhat anarchistic fellow antebellum, who was said to out-performed the federal government in snail delivery. Ahh, here it is "Lysander Spooner's American Letter Mail Company".
September 29, 2013 at 6:15 p.m.
At no place in the article are "shortage" or "optimal number of doctors" defined, only the implication that the authors and editors believe there should be more, and cheaper, and better doctors. How good are the "doctors" or "physicians"? Would a smaller number of better doctors be an improvement, or would a larger number of doctors with a range of knowledge and ability be better?
Economics shows that, if you want more or better, you should pay more... not other people, the individual desirer of more and/or better.
"By 1860, there were more than 55K physicians practicing in the United States, one of the highest per capita numbers of doctors in the world (about 175 per 100K)... By 1963... the number of doctors per 100K people in the United States -- 146 -- at the same level it was at in 1910." --- Dale Steinreich 2010-05-16 "100 years of US medical fascism" _Ludwig von Mises Institute_ http://mises.org/daily/4276 visited 2012-07-04
257 physicians/100K in 2008http://www.statehealthfacts.org/compa...citing Health, United States, 2010 (Table 106) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus1...visited 2012-07-04
146 doctors/100K in 1970165 doctors/100K in 1975193 doctors/100K in 1980220 doctors/100K in 1985234 doctors/100K in 1990262 doctors/100K in 1995266 doctors/100K in 2000"In 1970 there were 146 doctors per 100K people and by 2008 it hit 322 per 100K."http://www.freeby50.com/2011/05/physi...http://facts.kff.org/chart.aspx?ch=204visited 2012-07-04
"In 2010, there were 258.7 active physicians per 100K population in the United States, ranging from a high of 415.5 in Massachusetts to a low of 176.4 in Mississippi, according to the 2011 State Physician Workforce Data Book, Center for Workforce Studies — which is provided by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)."http://www.indianaeconomicdigest.net/...
See also:https://www.aamc.org/data/workforce/r...which has a vested in interest in increasing applications to med schools.
September 24, 2013 at 8:58 a.m.
Keep on trying. I've seen banana trees bearing fruit in a front yard near Cincinnati, and they grew well in Krohn Arboreteum in Eden Park. OTOH, most banana trees even in southern Georgia and northern Florida hardly ever bear, and those varieties tend to have tiny little bananas at that.
For Youngstown, I'd certainly consider at least a minimal temporary green-house that could be put up for a few months of each year.
September 18, 2013 at 11:16 a.m.
"Save your money"
What money? Have you looked at compensation levels and employment recently?
The lefties (including the RINOs) are putting on the squeeze to get people to break and knuckle-under.
September 9, 2013 at 11:05 a.m.
So, where can we "little people" get a chance to read the TPP agreement as it stands? ... or any of the others already in effect?
All I see on-line are self-serving and ambiguous summaries.
And, now that I think of it, why aren't they entering into proper treaties, with senate confirmation, instead of all these "fast-tracked" "agreements"?
September 8, 2013 at 11:11 a.m.
Now, they do blanket scans of all license plates, using computer systems on marked and unmarked government vehicles.
They require Socialist Insecurity Numbers, thumb-prints, notification of every residence change...
And yet, we have 10 million to 20 million illegal aliens "living in the shadows", which they've failed and refused to catch and remove. About 40% of those are visa-overstayers, but, no, we couldn't possibly run proper background investigations of visa applicants. We couldn't possibly make an honest effort to merely fence the 8,600 or so miles of borders,
but we sure can record millions of innocent people's cell phone locations, where they call and what location calls them, and link those devices to the purchasers/service purchasers, and record millions of conversations for later data-mining.
"The right of the citizen to drive on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a fundamental Constitutional right which must be protected by the courts." --- 1971 People v Horton 14 Cal App 3rd 667
"[The automobile is a] suit of armor with 200 horses inside, big enough to make love in. Once having tasted the delights of a society in which almost everyone can be a knight, it is hard to go back to being a peasant." --- Kenneth Boulding _The Green Life-style Handbook_ (quoted in Reason magazine)
September 3, 2013 at 1:09 p.m.
The comments are quite entertaining. "Undocumented drivers". Has anyone looked at the history of the advent and development of licensing of driving?
One of the earliest steam-powered trucks was made in France in 1769. --- The History Channel "Modern Marvels: The Evolution of the Truck"
Of course, the pharoahs tried to restrict who could drive a chariot back about 5 thousand years ago. They were the tanks, the military vehicles of their day, allowing one person to drive while another fired arrows... even before horses were big and strong enough to ride.
But licensing of driving didn't really take hold in the USA until the Great Depression, when a scattering of judges started arbitrarily declaring that it was no longer a right but a "privilege". The first traffic light was deployed in Ohio in the late 1930s.
But some places had licensing shortly after 1900, as soon as cars stopped being expensive play-things of the wealthy and the little people started buying them. They started out as an annual tax; you'd pay and they'd give you a receipt. Then they decided to spot-check whether people had the receipts every time there was a wreck, then whenever they had a light out. The hand-written receipts had people's names on them, and they decided those were inadequate, so they added descriptions. With more numbers, vehicle thefts increased, so they started requiring registration, then visible plates.
And so creeping draconianism increases. "Oh, this step isn't so bad. It's a reasonable precaution. It will solve our inability to control...", and so on with the next step and the next step. And at each step they say not to worry, the time of Big Brother is off there in the distance of time and space.
"The right of the citizen to travel upon the public high-ways & to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to life, liberty, & the pursuit of happiness." --- Thompson v Smith 154 SE 179
"Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to move from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, & the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the 14th amendment & by other provisions of the Constitution." --- Schactman v Dulles 96 App DC 287, 293
"The state and its municipalities are prohibited from violating substantive rights Owen v City 445 US 622 (1980), among which are the right to travel free of license, fee, and tax, within the interstate (Crandall v Nevada 73 US 35) and it cannot by any power do that which is expressly prohibited by any other power, that is taxation, eminent domain, licensing, as a matter of law (US & Utah v Daniels 22 P 159) nor may it do indirectly (Fairbanks v US 181 US 294 @300)." --- attributed to Lawton Chiles, late governor of Florida
September 3, 2013 at 12:58 p.m.
Sounds like a job for charity, to me.Medicaid should be eliminated.
August 29, 2013 at 11 a.m.
Hmm, I seem to recall the Shrub admin levying anti-dumping tariffs against China in the early 2000s, running it all through our legal processes, and being threatened with multi-billion-dollar penalties by the WTO, at which point they rapidly backed down.
August 9, 2013 at 12:38 p.m.