Sorry, no featured properties currently.
why is the comments close once again on the youngstown man caught tailing officers story?
most popular and commented upon and still cancelled once again, this makes the third time I believe!!
May 19, 2011 at 3:55 p.m.
How come comments are cancelled once again on the youngstown man caught tailing officers?
Does the truth hurt too much to people or what?
May 19, 2011 at 3:53 p.m.
@shot_in_youngstown, in reference to your comment # 57, you said, " Why did Jamie vandalize his own building?"
Here is hint: you can't vandalize the property that you own!!!!
May 19, 2011 at 3:46 p.m.
@spri, in reference to your comment # 600, you said, " Yes I admitted to that. I also think the lady who microwaved her baby is crazy. The people who shot into a room full of people to be crazy, and a lot more people who make there names headlines I think are crazy? Since when is thinking people are crazy such a crime???"
Referring to the article we are commenting on "Youngstown Man Tailing Officers", this is a one-sided story, and Mr. Ludt was not charged. This was Off. Ervin's side of the story, if you read the incident report that was sent to mental health and internal affairs investigatory authorities.
Understanding, police policies on open cases, and the article hitting the news two days later, this case must have already been investigated and closed? Since now it is a police story, because the police would not leak a story that is an ongoing investigation, unless it was to defame MR. LUDT!!!!!
May 19, 2011 at 11:36 a.m.
Going with Spri's logic or reason? It is the vindy and all the local media, speaking about the corruption in the Mahoning Valley, that is showing a disgrace of Youngstown, it has nothing to do with corrupt politicians showing a disgrace.
Apparently, the corrupt politicians are innocent, and the local media is disgracing them, according to Spri's logic!!!!
May 19, 2011 at 11:30 a.m.
@spri, in reference to your comment, # 597, you said, " Oh also my original post on here was just to state that I think that Jamie Ludt's building is a disgrace to youngstown because I have to drive by it everyday and it is degrading to our city. "
Here is the problem, I haven't heard you comment about the Glenwood Former Sparkle Market and their colors, and the YOU CAN building on Mahoning Avenue, which both have the same colors on the buildings, just like Ludt's!!
When are you going to make those comments? Or is it becaue the Mayor approved of those two other buildings, and he and others don't of Ludt's that there is a problem?
May 19, 2011 at 11:24 a.m.
@spri2008, in reference to your comment, #595, good luck with that, I have read my posts, and I make sure that I am well within guidelines, and unlike you, I am not here to try to inflict emotional distress or make deflamatory comments toward others!!! I am here to make comments that are factual, however; others don't want to here the truth!!!
May 19, 2011 at 11:20 a.m.
@whitesabbath, Mr. Ludt came to see me at my shop and informed me that he did happen to see Captain Patrick Bundy, on duty, driving unit # 74, pick his wife up at Elmo Tire in Youngstown, and deliver her to Struthers High School', rear entrance so nobody would see that he was using Struthers Property for personal usage.
I wonder how Struthers councilman Dan Yemma, who wants to be our new Mahoning County Treasurer would feel about this?
May 19, 2011 at 11:14 a.m.
@spri, in reference to your comment # 589, So what is your real reason for being on here? Is it just to incite people, harrass people, or just cause emotional distress?
May 19, 2011 at 11:09 a.m.
@spri, in reference to your comment # 587, you said, " It clearly makes you mad when I call you cute because you freak out every time I say it. So that comment was just for a rise out of you which clearly 75% of the comments on here are for. "
So clearly you are speaking for everyone else on here then? Does that mean that you are in touch with all of the other users, that are making allegations of mental illness and drug usage?
May 19, 2011 at 11:05 a.m.