I'm glad Randy got his dream job, unfortunate for YSU - maybe, but the stage is now set for what may be a very big win here.
February 23, 2014 at 11:23 a.m.
Does one get the (continuing) impression that Penn has any EVER had any interest in horse racing for their slots casino ? What a joke.
January 24, 2014 at 7:06 a.m.
Same wages as France ? LOL - Idiots. No understanding or recognition of the costs of living in France where they enjoy 61 % HIGHER national tax environment than here in the USA including taxes on wages ( 49.5 % for single workers without children, 42 % with two children fir example ) typical modern union organizers: ready, fire,aim.
January 18, 2014 at 9:21 a.m.
author50 seems to have excess time on his hands to be worked about such trivial matters. I say GOOD ON THEM for investing in the city, touting their investment and spurring growth and spending. The City has codes to enforce and rules to follow. What have YOU contributed to the good of the city, eh? You cannot fault the department for following the regulations they were hired to uphold and enforce. But hey - thanks for playing !
January 8, 2014 at 9:47 p.m.
And this bothers you why author50 ?
January 8, 2014 at 7:56 a.m.
The die is cast.The move is really about the future and necessary to that end otherwise an irreversible decline to nothing, a fact regardless if you agree or not.
Maybe rich people are wealthy because they are smarter after all eh ? Big picture kind of folks.
December 19, 2013 at 5:20 p.m.
The only way for Mooney to survive another 5 years, 10 at the latest, was to move. Staying would assure that not enough tuition paying students would be attending to meet the bills, let alone offset the scholarship (?) students.
Simple economics drove the organizing of quite a few alumni who really do care to see the school continue. It has nothing to do with with elite or wealthy - only that fewer and fewer would choose to send their children to the school as it is now and that alone would close the place
September 4, 2013 at 8:33 p.m.
yes, interesting isn't it given that there is no scientific validity for testing student athletes why not extend the same "courtesy" to the staff ? Who gets hired without a drug test these days anyway ?
August 7, 2013 at 12:40 p.m.
were the new hires drug tested?
August 6, 2013 at 10:39 a.m.
endthismess: The policy will do nothing to change behaviors in the long term while actually INCREASING high risk behaviors in a sub-segment of the target population. That is not my opinion, that is the outcome of numerous studies over the twenty years these programs have been in existence. There may well be other positive intangibles but On the other hand not one study has been published in a high quality journal that demonstrated changed behaviors after the season. So, I ask, what IS the point ?
July 17, 2013 at 2:16 p.m.