What was sad about the situation is that people who have simple traffic violations were given sentences that made his sentence for the original charges look like nothing. Where was the prosecutor? Why was it not brought forward that he owned two of the dogs living in his wife’s home (which by marriage makes it his home too) when he was originally charged in 2008. Are you meaning to tell me that he is not responsible for these animals when his wife is not around? Does he assume no responsibility to their care? Trust me I am sure that he cares for these animals when his wife is not around someone has to… and by taking care of said basic needs he would be responsible for these animals i.e. providing care being responsible harboring same thing. If you look up harbor in the Webster- Merrian dictonary it means : a place of security and comfort : REFUGE which it would be necessary for him to provide in his wife’s absence.
January 13, 2012 at 4:51 p.m.
permalink suggest removal