America, wake up! This chick looks good but says nothing RELIABLE.She and Michelle Bachman are Tweedle-Dumb and Tweedle-Dee. What they say amounts to distortion and lies. When they aren't delivering a written speech, they can't answer questions because they lack KNOWLEDGE! They may have acollege educations but they must have bought their degrees rather than earning them.
April 15, 2010 at 9:43 a.m.
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
April 15, 2010 at 9:28 a.m.
Good. Brown ought to turn his attention to his duties rather than wasting his time at the Tea Party with these Benedict Arnolds!!!!
April 14, 2010 at 3:02 p.m.
Fire this Barney Fife or take his bullets away!
April 13, 2010 at 10:16 a.m.
Explain the headline!
April 13, 2010 at 10:12 a.m.
These people, during FDR's administration, would have protested agsainst the signing of social security and during Johnson's adminsitration would have said no to medicare.
In fact, many of those candidates who are backed by the Tea Party are against both and will work to take it away. See how you will like these Tea Partiers then, seniors!
These people who say "NO" are obstacles to our progress. They don't care about what's right for America; they care about what's right for them. They are domestic terrorists threatening our way of life.
April 12, 2010 at 11:32 a.m.
When cops don't want to chase after teens on foot, they hit them with their patrol cars to stop them. Therefore, though this is not in the training book, it doesn't surprise me that they would do the same with a dog.
April 28, 2009 at 7:51 p.m.
I can see that some people never change. I would have thought that your comments would have been more tempered given the history at Kent State. At that time, citizens like yourselves said assinine things like, "they should have killed more" and "serves them right." Ignorance still dominates.
April 27, 2009 at 3:53 p.m.
The suspect hiding in the basement was arrested on obstructing official business charges.
Isn't there anyone who finds this charge ironic? Why not charge this kid with firing a weapon? If the kids were shooting as they were driving, as the police claimed, they would have found a gun or guns. Why not test his hands for gun powder?
THe only fact we know for sure is that the police fired a gun 13 times. The cop should be charged. He was all charged up with the excitement of a chase. The dog probably wasn't aggressive--this is not characteristic of a puppy. It probably startled the cop. Therefore he started shooting. It reminds me of a person who "accidently" shoots another 6 times. Once is understandable but multiple times is hard to justify.
April 21, 2009 at 10:49 a.m.
Male or female, an 18 year old does not deserves to be labeled a sexual offender for having sex with another teenager!
April 20, 2009 at 6:33 p.m.