Were you there Walt? Like I said, you must know better than the people in the courtroom. Probably don't need a Judge or jury, folks should just call you-save alot of money
July 29, 2014 at 12:46 p.m.
Not guilty/I wonder how furious the normal posters will be? I wonder if they say bad things about his parents? I wonder if they say they know better than the jury? I wonder if they say the case was fixed? Or I wonder if they say the justice system works and we shouldn't predetermine guilt or try people in the press???? Nah they'll spew some hateful garbage...idiots do that when they are wrong, sour grapes are the fruit of the absurd.
July 29, 2014 at 12:23 p.m.
Oh yeah EVERYONE WHO COMMENTED PREVIOUSLY.........not guilty
July 29, 2014 at 12:19 p.m.
I really have to laugh at people whose comments focus on McNally as opposed to the issue at hand- First of all I am curious as to how many posters actually reside within the city, but what McNally is requesting is the right thing plain and simple. Those on council who oppose it are those who feel that council seats should be held as monarchy or birthright Gillam. Guess you can just avoid the constructs of term limits by swapping with family members. That is the only reason for opposition to the proposed changes-worked well for the Hagans
July 22, 2014 at 11:10 a.m.
Okay-Belinky: 7,500-150,000 unreported. Cooperation with ongoing cases. 60 days house arrest, 2, 500 fine and 200 hours community service. Antonini: 3,000 unreported. Cooperation with ongoing cases 5 MONTHS PRISON, 5 MONTHS HOUSE ARREST, 150 hours community service, 2,000 fine --Yeah that seems fair. F%@#ing joke
July 10, 2014 at 12:16 p.m.
Wow. Bertie found the energy to write about two original paragraphs this week. Really was interesting reading the 15 year old "news" stories on Strollo and Trafficant. My God -are there any Editors at that paper who say, "Bert, you actually have to work this month"!
June 29, 2014 at 11:25 a.m.
GDOG 1362 comments to prove you are an idiot when it would have only taken 1
June 19, 2014 at 7:11 p.m.
So let me get this straight. The administrator, who to have such a certification had to successfully pass an extensive background clearance, was locked out of the business she had a contract to maintain because her HUSBAND was convicted?!?!?! No allegations of abuse were ever presented just that her husband had a background issue? He was not employed there and they shut down HER business? So you are not allowed to have any association with anyone ever convicted of such a crime? Yeah that's a good Christian -American philosophy. If he violates probation do they get to send her to jail as well. Diocese better just write that check.
June 19, 2014 at 4:20 p.m.
Bert when you ask how a grown man especially an officeholder can be subservient to one man, you mean of course the subservience Traficanti, Ludt, Gains and yourself appliend to George Tablack right? Only the subservient would crappy up the budget with a 20 million pit. 75,000.00 my a--.
June 15, 2014 at 7:34 a.m.
Absolute outrage should be expressed heree. No surprise though his entire docket is a mess-his Magistrate Fehr is the slowest weakest performing jurist down there
June 12, 2014 at 4:48 p.m.