As important as Issue 2 is, We the People of Ohio must also remember it isn't the only single minded "screw the people and protect the republican agenda" on the ballot this November.
Vote NO Issue 1 - Ohio doesn't need to have career judges.
Vote NO Issue 2 - Ohio doesn't need laws which are clearly one political view point and then exempt the very people that made the law from following the law.
Vote NO Issue 3 - Ohio requires the people to buy car insurance, which was never put to vote, but requiring health insurance is somehow idiotic?
I will be voting NO. Ohio needs a solution and SB 5 is not it. Instead of working with "we the people", Kasich decided to act like a dictator and impose his own rules of law, which he is not required to follow. SB 5 is horribly written legislation.
NO = Issue 1 NO = Issue 2 NO = Future redistricting map.
Ignoring the obvious questions of how well students may learn with 50 students per teacher, I want to know how Kasich will physically fit 50 students into a single class room? Has he been in a school building lately? True, the state will save money by laying off teachers. But where is the money going to come from to renovate schools to fit 50 students in one class room? Kasich's mindless comment will cost millions and millions of dollars far and above any savings of less teachers to retool schools for large class sizes. Oh, that is right, we are broke. No money. I guess teachers will just hold the classes in the gymnasium or cafeteria. Way to go Kasich, Ohio can once again have one room school houses. Kasich didn't want the public to vote. We the people had to demand our right to vote. I will vote NO on SB5, not for unions or non-unions, not for savings or not savings, and not for the rich or the poor. I will vote no because it is simply bad poorly constructed legislation. We the people of Ohio need a solution. SB5 is not a solution.
Misinformation distorts measure, Kasich tells crowd
As important as Issue 2 is, We the People of Ohio must also remember it isn't the only single minded "screw the people and protect the republican agenda" on the ballot this November.
Vote NO Issue 1 - Ohio doesn't need to have career judges.
Vote NO Issue 2 - Ohio doesn't need laws which are clearly one political view point and then exempt the very people that made the law from following the law.
Vote NO Issue 3 - Ohio requires the people to buy car insurance, which was never put to vote, but requiring health insurance is somehow idiotic?
November 3, 2011 at 6:44 a.m. permalink suggest removal
2 sides of Issue 2
I will be voting NO. Ohio needs a solution and SB 5 is not it. Instead of working with "we the people", Kasich decided to act like a dictator and impose his own rules of law, which he is not required to follow. SB 5 is horribly written legislation.
NO = Issue 1
NO = Issue 2
NO = Future redistricting map.
October 30, 2011 at 11:42 a.m. permalink suggest removal
What’s next if SB 5 repeal is OK’d?
Ignoring the obvious questions of how well students may learn with 50 students per teacher, I want to know how Kasich will physically fit 50 students into a single class room? Has he been in a school building lately? True, the state will save money by laying off teachers. But where is the money going to come from to renovate schools to fit 50 students in one class room? Kasich's mindless comment will cost millions and millions of dollars far and above any savings of less teachers to retool schools for large class sizes. Oh, that is right, we are broke. No money. I guess teachers will just hold the classes in the gymnasium or cafeteria. Way to go Kasich, Ohio can once again have one room school houses.
Kasich didn't want the public to vote. We the people had to demand our right to vote. I will vote NO on SB5, not for unions or non-unions, not for savings or not savings, and not for the rich or the poor. I will vote no because it is simply bad poorly constructed legislation. We the people of Ohio need a solution. SB5 is not a solution.
October 27, 2011 at 11:50 p.m. permalink suggest removal