SSM is a recessive trait - ????
Red hair is a recessive traitBlue eyes is a recessive trait
So far there is no evidence that the human species is on the road to destruction by either red hair or blue eyes.
February 20, 2014 at 3:07 p.m.
Are you drinking again?
Your comments: " we are still reaping the benefits of George Bush on large scale attacks like the World Trade Center", make no sense whatever.
February 12, 2014 at 3:43 p.m.
76YTOWN, I was expecting that you would provide names.Do you consider this privileged information?
December 16, 2013 at 6:42 p.m.
So who were the three providers?
December 16, 2013 at 3:16 p.m.
Faux News...... Brought to you by eivo
December 2, 2013 at 11:19 a.m.
@76Ytown: if you can name a specific drug that you would consider an abortion drug, then we can consider if it has a preventative role.
Norlevo, the "morning after pill" PREVENTS pregnancy by delaying ovulation.
Mitepristone, destroys a fertilized egg, terminating the pregnancy. It is a prescription only drug that is administered under the supervision of a physician.
That creates a dilemma for folks who insist that the government should not interfere in the doctor patient relationship but also want the government to prevent doctors from prescribing this drug.
@ eivo.... Go back under the bridge with the trolls
November 30, 2013 at 9:08 p.m.
Exactly correct 76. Eivo, like it or not that's the way insurance works.
Let us know when you find an insurance pool of only healthy people without genetic flaws.
November 29, 2013 at 10:05 p.m.
Maybe she could put a note in her tax return that her tax money only go towards funding the SNAP program.
Taxpayers don't get to pick and choose what their funds are used for.
I suspect that the same is true with healthcare premiums.
I may not like that some of my premium dollars are being spent on benefits for obese or drug rehab, but can't very well tell my insurer to refuse benefits to other folks in my plan because I don't agree with their lifestyle.
November 29, 2013 at 1 p.m.
@eivo, A 2013 policy that had pre-existing conditions excluded can not be offered in 2014.
A 2013 policy that had pre-existing conditions excluded cost less that the same policy that had no pre-existing conditions excluded.
Is there some reason that would not also hold true for 2014?
So, where do you find fault with the "spin" ?
November 29, 2013 at 12:43 p.m.
@ evivo,Are you saying that is not true?
November 29, 2013 at 7:44 a.m.