When a man is accused of a sexual crime by a woman and there is no evidence, it becomes "he said/she said". Who nearly always wins that battle of words? Your comments, and others with similar comments, provide the answer. The woman can never be wrong, right? They would never lie about something like that, right?
Let me share another intresting event concerning Natasha Frenchko.
The Saturday after the after the trial ended my brother Steve and his wife Ann were at a Bar/Grill in Warren, Ohio. Within a couple of minutes of their arrival a group of three men came into the Bar. One of the men, the largest man, started hitting on my brothers wife, Ann. He kept saying things like, "I've had my eye on you, baby", and "Come on, just give me a hug or two". It became obvious that he was trying to provoke an incident with Steve for some reason. It didn't work. Ann blew him off and Steve was able to maintain his composure.
Within a couple of minutes of this confrontation, in walks Natasha Frenchko, who walks directly to the three men and starts visiting with them. Steve took the opportunity to approach Ms Frenchko and tell her that she had convicted an innocent man. There was no scene. Steve was calm and composed.
In the court room on Monday prior to the sentencing Natasha Frenchko walked up to Steve in the court room and pointed him out. She then made a comment in the court that a member of the Dew family had approached her concerning the case over the weekend.
Steve was taken out of the courtroom, harassed by police, and pushed around a bit. He was warned that they were going to do a background check on him and watch him closely.
Now ask yourself, what are the chances of 3 men who are friends of Natasha Frenchko hitting on Steve's wife in a bar in Trumbull county? What are the chances that Natasha Frenchko would just happen to show up at the same time?
You don't know what you are talking about. You have to be crazy.
There are not any "children" who claim to be victims. Law enforcement did intimidate a mentally retarded girl who Greg was treating for free to make an incriminating statement. Child services did a thorough investigation. The girl admitted to lying about her statement to appease the police. Child services sent a very nice letter to Greg explaining what had happened and apologized on behalf of the girl. I have the letter from Child Services in my possession if you care to see it.
Interestingly, the prosecution wanted to introduce the girls original statement as evidence against Greg in the trial.
The prosecutor also wanted to introduce a statement from another patient from the Rehabilitation Center against Greg. This lady claims that Greg sexually molested her when she received treatment from Greg at the Rehabilitation Center. What is interesting about this patient is that she didn't start going to the Rehabilitation Center for treatment until mid-April 2007, 3 weeks after Greg was put on administrative leave. Greg was not even treating patients at the Rehabilitation Center when this woman allegedly received treatment there.
What honest person would attempt to perpetrate such garbage against another person when they KNOW it is wrong?
The prosecutor you must be referring to is Natasha Frenchko. The same Natasha Frenchko who told the jury in her closing arguments that Greg had forced Shannon Gallagher into having painful sexual intercourse with him against her will on 3 different occasions. Funny, I have read every piece of paper, viewed every video, and listened to every audio in evidence in this case at least 10 times. Shannon Gallagher NEVER said that she and Greg EVER had sexual intercourse. In fact, she stated on several occasions that sexual intercourse never took place.
The fact is that the prosecutors are so used to lying that they don't know what the truth is. They have reached the point that they believe their own lies.
You are not far behind them in believing fantasies.
Go to http://www.FreeDrDew.com and get the facts. This was a clear case of the prosecutors, law enforcement, the accusers, and the trial court conspiring to convict an innocent man.
Keep coming back to the website. More details, including actual audio from the various interviews, will be made available to the public.
Once we have the trial transcripts in hand we will be able to post the numerous differences in the testimonies of Shannon Gallagher, Torey Votaw, and Detective Doug Flara, when compared to their original statements and testimonies.
We will also be posting the numerous discrepancies in their various testimonies and statements before the trial even began.
We will prove what we have been saying all along and will use the alleged victims and Detective Flara's own words and statements to do it.
Have you ever seen Greg do any of the things that these girls are alleging? Look at all of the comments by the gymnasts that were on Greg's team above. Interesting that the unanimous comments of the parents and gymnasts, other than these 2 girls, all state that Greg was never inappropriate and that it was these gymnasts were the inappropriate ones.
There was a large number of Greg's gymnasts who wrote letters of leniency to the judge prior to the sentencing.
You will be able to see a lot of the letters and comments from many people... all supportive... all stating that Greg was one of the most decent and gentle men they knew. These letters are from other doctors, members of his staff, etc...
I have listened to your interview with the police concerning Greg. Interesting that you told them that you didn't know of any sexual activities of Greg with other young women... including you.
Was Greg flirtatious at times? Did Greg seem overly friendly at times? Did Greg act goofy at times? Yes to all of those questions. Being flirtatious, friendly, or goofy is a far cry from being a rapist.
You are an attorney. You understand hearsay versus first person. You cannot even provide any hearsay evidence that you have personally heard concerning Greg with other women. How can you say that you know Greg is a rapist or a sexual predator when you admit yourself that you have not even heard anyone claim to have had sexual relations with Greg in your police interview? Unless, of course, you are going to change your story like the police and the gymnasts have.
The fact that your husband is in law enforcement and it was law enforcement officials who perjured themselves during the trial in order to get a conviction makes a difference.
If you do some research you will find that over 40% of the men who have been accused of sexual crimes against a woman by a woman are actually innocent. When it becomes a "he said" - "she said" issue the woman's word is always taken over the man's word, even when it can be shown that a woman with severe mental issues, a history of violence against men, and a history of making sexual allegations against other men can be shown... like Sharon Blake. See the above posting on Sharon Blake.
Please take notice of the section "Recovered Memories" in particular. When you see and hear the evidence on the charges brought by the gymnastics complainants against Greg you will be amazed.
Men now live in a world very similar to the world of the Salem witch trials. All a woman needs to do to get an execution is to point the finger. The courts and legislature have abandoned the need to provide any proof of rape. Any man can be convicted of rape by any woman just by merely making the allegation.
Ironically, woman who recant their allegations are rarely, if ever, punished. They can literally destroy the life of a man and his family with the false allegations, recant, and then walk away without fear of legal action against them. Can you think of a better way to get revenge if you were a woman?
Sadly, as in this case, it happens more often than we want to believe.
How about a preview... Sharon Blake, one of the patients, has a long history of psychiatric problems. She was divorced by her husband for domestic violence against him and child abuse against her own children. She was under the care of her primary physician for mental issues and was being treated by 2 different mental health professionals, a psychologist and a psychiatrist, while seeing Dr. Dew. Mrs. Blake did not disclose this information on her health history form at the Rehabilitation Center previous to her being treated. This information was disclosed in a formal affidavit by her psychologist for the $ 100,000.00 civil suit that Mrs. Blake filed BEFORE Dr. Dew was charged of any crimes.
In short, Sharon Blake is a mental patient who has a history of physical abuse against men and making false sexual abuse allegations against men.
Anyone who heard her testimony and her statements at the sentencing saw and heard the obvious. Her statements will be published on the FreeDrDew website.
And just for the record... I know who mdjd is... and she is a crackpot. She is an attorney in Mahoning county and was very supportive of Greg's efforts in the beginning. She personally assured Greg's attorneys that Greg was incapable of the acts he was being accused of. She talked with my parents in the Mahoning county courthouse on numerous occasions concerning the case, always supportive of Greg. It may be interesting to the rest of you that her domestic partner is in law enforcement... interesting...
Judge R. Scott Krichbaum was part of an act of public corruption in convicting an innocent man of alleged crimes that he did not commit.
During the sentencing procedures Judge Krichbaum compared Dr. Dew to a Nazi Death Camp Physician. His comments were not only inappropriate for a person of Judge Krichbaum's ethnic background, but completely ridiculous and preposterous. To try and associate Dr. Dew with Nazism and anti-semitism is more than "over the top" and is another demonstration of the prejudice of the trial court, prosecution, and law enforcement against Dr. Dew.
If you would like to know the truth... as recorded in the evidence of the prosecution, law enforcement and official dockets of the court go to http://www.FreeDrDew.com for the entire truth. The site is now under construction and should be nearly compete by Friday, April 4, 2008.
The site will make public evidence that was not presented during the trial to the jury because of the "politics" involved in the trial. The evidence will include recorded conversations between complainants and law enforcement officers, official court documents, signed affidavits by law enforcement officers, etc... Read and listen to ALL of the evidence and you will see that the outcome of the trial was manipulated and shaped by the trial court, the prosecution, and law enforcement.
You will see how public officials have abused the power of government, committed perjury, coerced witnesses, stacked the jury, and violated the Constitutional rights of Dr. Dew in order to get a conviction "at any cost". You will see and hear how the complainants, law enforcement, and the prosecution continuously changed their statements, introduced contradicting documents, withheld evidence from the defense to gain strategic advantage, modified the indictments on numerous occasions, including a major modification of the indictments on the morning of the first day of trial.
It is sad that Mahoning county has learned to accept corruption in government as a way of life.
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn." Prov. 29:2.
Ask yourselves why the Mahoning Valley is so corrupt the next time you go to the voting booth to re-elect the criminals now in office. We live in a republic. We can make a change for the better. We choose those who represent us with our vote. If you continue to support the criminals in office then you deserve the fruits of your own vote.
Judge R. Scott Krichbaum was part of an act of public corruption in convicting an innocent man of alleged crimes that he did not commit.
During the sentencing procedures Judge Krichbaum compared Dr. Dew to a Nazi Death Camp Physician. His comments were not only inappropriate for a person of Judge Krichbaum's ethnic background, but completely ridiculous and preposterous. To try and associate Dr. Dew with Nazism and anti-semitism is more than "over the top" and is another demonstration of the prejudice of the trial court, prosecution, and law enforcement against Dr. Dew.
If you would like to know the truth... as recorded in the evidence of the prosecution, law enforcement and official dockets of the court go to http://www.FreeDrDew.com for the entire truth. The site is now under construction and should be nearly compete by Friday, April 4, 2008.
The site will make public evidence that was not presented during the trial to the jury because of the "politics" involved in the trial. The evidence will include recorded conversations between complainants and law enforcement officers, official court documents, signed affidavits by law enforcement officers, etc... Read and listen to ALL of the evidence and you will see that the outcome of the trial was manipulated and shaped by the trial court, the prosecution, and law enforcement.
You will see how public officials have abused the power of government, committed perjury, coerced witnesses, stacked the jury, and violated the Constitutional rights of Dr. Dew in order to get a conviction "at any cost". You will see and hear how the complainants, law enforcement, and the prosecution continuously changed their statements, introduced contradicting documents, withheld evidence from the defense to gain strategic advantage, modified the indictments on numerous occasions, including a major modification of the indictments on the morning of the first day of trial.
It is sad that Mahoning county has learned to accept corruption in government as a way of life.
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn." Prov. 29:2.
Ask yourselves why the Mahoning Valley is so corrupt the next time you go to the voting booth to re-elect the criminals now in office. We live in a republic. We can make a change for the better. We choose those who represent us with our vote. If you continue to support the criminals in office then you deserve the fruits of your own vote.
Judge R. Scott Krichbaum was part of an act of public corruption in convicting an innocent man of alleged crimes that he did not commit.
During the sentencing procedures Judge Krichbaum compared Dr. Dew to a Nazi Death Camp Physician. His comments were not only inappropriate for a person of Judge Krichbaum's ethnic background, but completely ridiculous and preposterous. To try and associate Dr. Dew with Nazism and anti-semitism is more than "over the top" and is another demonstration of the prejudice of the trial court, prosecution, and law enforcement against Dr. Dew.
If you would like to know the truth... as recorded in the evidence of the prosecution, law enforcement and official dockets of the court go to http://www.FreeDrDew.com for the entire truth. The site is now under construction and should be nearly compete by Friday, April 4, 2008.
The site will make public evidence that was not presented during the trial to the jury because of the "politics" involved in the trial. The evidence will include recorded conversations between complainants and law enforcement officers, official court documents, signed affidavits by law enforcement officers, etc... Read and listen to ALL of the evidence and you will see that the outcome of the trial was manipulated and shaped by the trial court, the prosecution, and law enforcement.
You will see how public officials have abused the power of government, committed perjury, coerced witnesses, stacked the jury, and violated the Constitutional rights of Dr. Dew in order to get a conviction "at any cost". You will see and hear how the complainants, law enforcement, and the prosecution continuously changed their statements, introduced contradicting documents, withheld evidence from the defense to gain strategic advantage, modified the indictments on numerous occasions, including a major modification of the indictments on the morning of the first day of trial.
It is sad that Mahoning county has learned to accept corruption in government as a way of life.
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn." Prov. 29:2.
Ask yourselves why the Mahoning Valley is so corrupt the next time you go to the voting booth to re-elect the criminals now in office. We live in a republic. We can make a change for the better. We choose those who represent us with our vote. If you continue to support the criminals in office then you deserve the fruits of your own vote.
Posted on April 4 at 1:02 p.m.
henryviii1509,
When a man is accused of a sexual crime by a woman and there is no evidence, it becomes "he said/she said". Who nearly always wins that battle of words? Your comments, and others with similar comments, provide the answer. The woman can never be wrong, right? They would never lie about something like that, right?
Wake up...
Posted on April 4 at 12:56 p.m.
Let me share another intresting event concerning Natasha Frenchko.
The Saturday after the after the trial ended my brother Steve and his wife Ann were at a Bar/Grill in Warren, Ohio. Within a couple of minutes of their arrival a group of three men came into the Bar. One of the men, the largest man, started hitting on my brothers wife, Ann. He kept saying things like, "I've had my eye on you, baby", and "Come on, just give me a hug or two". It became obvious that he was trying to provoke an incident with Steve for some reason. It didn't work. Ann blew him off and Steve was able to maintain his composure.
Within a couple of minutes of this confrontation, in walks Natasha Frenchko, who walks directly to the three men and starts visiting with them. Steve took the opportunity to approach Ms Frenchko and tell her that she had convicted an innocent man. There was no scene. Steve was calm and composed.
In the court room on Monday prior to the sentencing Natasha Frenchko walked up to Steve in the court room and pointed him out. She then made a comment in the court that a member of the Dew family had approached her concerning the case over the weekend.
Steve was taken out of the courtroom, harassed by police, and pushed around a bit. He was warned that they were going to do a background check on him and watch him closely.
Now ask yourself, what are the chances of 3 men who are friends of Natasha Frenchko hitting on Steve's wife in a bar in Trumbull county? What are the chances that Natasha Frenchko would just happen to show up at the same time?
Posted on April 4 at 12:33 p.m.
Melissa,
You don't know what you are talking about. You have to be crazy.
There are not any "children" who claim to be victims. Law enforcement did intimidate a mentally retarded girl who Greg was treating for free to make an incriminating statement. Child services did a thorough investigation. The girl admitted to lying about her statement to appease the police. Child services sent a very nice letter to Greg explaining what had happened and apologized on behalf of the girl. I have the letter from Child Services in my possession if you care to see it.
Interestingly, the prosecution wanted to introduce the girls original statement as evidence against Greg in the trial.
The prosecutor also wanted to introduce a statement from another patient from the Rehabilitation Center against Greg. This lady claims that Greg sexually molested her when she received treatment from Greg at the Rehabilitation Center. What is interesting about this patient is that she didn't start going to the Rehabilitation Center for treatment until mid-April 2007, 3 weeks after Greg was put on administrative leave. Greg was not even treating patients at the Rehabilitation Center when this woman allegedly received treatment there.
What honest person would attempt to perpetrate such garbage against another person when they KNOW it is wrong?
The prosecutor you must be referring to is Natasha Frenchko. The same Natasha Frenchko who told the jury in her closing arguments that Greg had forced Shannon Gallagher into having painful sexual intercourse with him against her will on 3 different occasions. Funny, I have read every piece of paper, viewed every video, and listened to every audio in evidence in this case at least 10 times. Shannon Gallagher NEVER said that she and Greg EVER had sexual intercourse. In fact, she stated on several occasions that sexual intercourse never took place.
The fact is that the prosecutors are so used to lying that they don't know what the truth is. They have reached the point that they believe their own lies.
You are not far behind them in believing fantasies.
Posted on April 4 at 9:18 a.m.
Go to http://www.FreeDrDew.com and get the facts. This was a clear case of the prosecutors, law enforcement, the accusers, and the trial court conspiring to convict an innocent man.
Keep coming back to the website. More details, including actual audio from the various interviews, will be made available to the public.
Once we have the trial transcripts in hand we will be able to post the numerous differences in the testimonies of Shannon Gallagher, Torey Votaw, and Detective Doug Flara, when compared to their original statements and testimonies.
We will also be posting the numerous discrepancies in their various testimonies and statements before the trial even began.
We will prove what we have been saying all along and will use the alleged victims and Detective Flara's own words and statements to do it.
CAN YOU SPELL PERJURY????
Posted on April 3 at 7:50 a.m.
mdjd,
Have you ever seen Greg do any of the things that these girls are alleging? Look at all of the comments by the gymnasts that were on Greg's team above. Interesting that the unanimous comments of the parents and gymnasts, other than these 2 girls, all state that Greg was never inappropriate and that it was these gymnasts were the inappropriate ones.
There was a large number of Greg's gymnasts who wrote letters of leniency to the judge prior to the sentencing.
You will be able to see a lot of the letters and comments from many people... all supportive... all stating that Greg was one of the most decent and gentle men they knew. These letters are from other doctors, members of his staff, etc...
I have listened to your interview with the police concerning Greg. Interesting that you told them that you didn't know of any sexual activities of Greg with other young women... including you.
Was Greg flirtatious at times? Did Greg seem overly friendly at times? Did Greg act goofy at times? Yes to all of those questions. Being flirtatious, friendly, or goofy is a far cry from being a rapist.
You are an attorney. You understand hearsay versus first person. You cannot even provide any hearsay evidence that you have personally heard concerning Greg with other women. How can you say that you know Greg is a rapist or a sexual predator when you admit yourself that you have not even heard anyone claim to have had sexual relations with Greg in your police interview? Unless, of course, you are going to change your story like the police and the gymnasts have.
The fact that your husband is in law enforcement and it was law enforcement officials who perjured themselves during the trial in order to get a conviction makes a difference.
Posted on April 2 at 3:55 p.m.
Kennith77d,
If you do some research you will find that over 40% of the men who have been accused of sexual crimes against a woman by a woman are actually innocent. When it becomes a "he said" - "she said" issue the woman's word is always taken over the man's word, even when it can be shown that a woman with severe mental issues, a history of violence against men, and a history of making sexual allegations against other men can be shown... like Sharon Blake. See the above posting on Sharon Blake.
http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/vol...
Please take notice of the section "Recovered Memories" in particular. When you see and hear the evidence on the charges brought by the gymnastics complainants against Greg you will be amazed.
Men now live in a world very similar to the world of the Salem witch trials. All a woman needs to do to get an execution is to point the finger. The courts and legislature have abandoned the need to provide any proof of rape. Any man can be convicted of rape by any woman just by merely making the allegation.
Ironically, woman who recant their allegations are rarely, if ever, punished. They can literally destroy the life of a man and his family with the false allegations, recant, and then walk away without fear of legal action against them. Can you think of a better way to get revenge if you were a woman?
Sadly, as in this case, it happens more often than we want to believe.
Posted on April 2 at 11:32 a.m.
How about a preview... Sharon Blake, one of the patients, has a long history of psychiatric problems. She was divorced by her husband for domestic violence against him and child abuse against her own children. She was under the care of her primary physician for mental issues and was being treated by 2 different mental health professionals, a psychologist and a psychiatrist, while seeing Dr. Dew. Mrs. Blake did not disclose this information on her health history form at the Rehabilitation Center previous to her being treated. This information was disclosed in a formal affidavit by her psychologist for the $ 100,000.00 civil suit that Mrs. Blake filed BEFORE Dr. Dew was charged of any crimes.
In short, Sharon Blake is a mental patient who has a history of physical abuse against men and making false sexual abuse allegations against men.
Anyone who heard her testimony and her statements at the sentencing saw and heard the obvious. Her statements will be published on the FreeDrDew website.
And just for the record... I know who mdjd is... and she is a crackpot. She is an attorney in Mahoning county and was very supportive of Greg's efforts in the beginning. She personally assured Greg's attorneys that Greg was incapable of the acts he was being accused of. She talked with my parents in the Mahoning county courthouse on numerous occasions concerning the case, always supportive of Greg. It may be interesting to the rest of you that her domestic partner is in law enforcement... interesting...
Posted on April 1 at 7:03 a.m.
Judge R. Scott Krichbaum was part of an act of public corruption in convicting an innocent man of alleged crimes that he did not commit.
During the sentencing procedures Judge Krichbaum compared Dr. Dew to a Nazi Death Camp Physician. His comments were not only inappropriate for a person of Judge Krichbaum's ethnic background, but completely ridiculous and preposterous. To try and associate Dr. Dew with Nazism and anti-semitism is more than "over the top" and is another demonstration of the prejudice of the trial court, prosecution, and law enforcement against Dr. Dew.
If you would like to know the truth... as recorded in the evidence of the prosecution, law enforcement and official dockets of the court go to http://www.FreeDrDew.com for the entire truth. The site is now under construction and should be nearly compete by Friday, April 4, 2008.
The site will make public evidence that was not presented during the trial to the jury because of the "politics" involved in the trial. The evidence will include recorded conversations between complainants and law enforcement officers, official court documents, signed affidavits by law enforcement officers, etc... Read and listen to ALL of the evidence and you will see that the outcome of the trial was manipulated and shaped by the trial court, the prosecution, and law enforcement.
You will see how public officials have abused the power of government, committed perjury, coerced witnesses, stacked the jury, and violated the Constitutional rights of Dr. Dew in order to get a conviction "at any cost". You will see and hear how the complainants, law enforcement, and the prosecution continuously changed their statements, introduced contradicting documents, withheld evidence from the defense to gain strategic advantage, modified the indictments on numerous occasions, including a major modification of the indictments on the morning of the first day of trial.
It is sad that Mahoning county has learned to accept corruption in government as a way of life.
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn." Prov. 29:2.
Ask yourselves why the Mahoning Valley is so corrupt the next time you go to the voting booth to re-elect the criminals now in office. We live in a republic. We can make a change for the better. We choose those who represent us with our vote. If you continue to support the criminals in office then you deserve the fruits of your own vote.
Posted on April 1 at 6:59 a.m.
Judge R. Scott Krichbaum was part of an act of public corruption in convicting an innocent man of alleged crimes that he did not commit.
During the sentencing procedures Judge Krichbaum compared Dr. Dew to a Nazi Death Camp Physician. His comments were not only inappropriate for a person of Judge Krichbaum's ethnic background, but completely ridiculous and preposterous. To try and associate Dr. Dew with Nazism and anti-semitism is more than "over the top" and is another demonstration of the prejudice of the trial court, prosecution, and law enforcement against Dr. Dew.
If you would like to know the truth... as recorded in the evidence of the prosecution, law enforcement and official dockets of the court go to http://www.FreeDrDew.com for the entire truth. The site is now under construction and should be nearly compete by Friday, April 4, 2008.
The site will make public evidence that was not presented during the trial to the jury because of the "politics" involved in the trial. The evidence will include recorded conversations between complainants and law enforcement officers, official court documents, signed affidavits by law enforcement officers, etc... Read and listen to ALL of the evidence and you will see that the outcome of the trial was manipulated and shaped by the trial court, the prosecution, and law enforcement.
You will see how public officials have abused the power of government, committed perjury, coerced witnesses, stacked the jury, and violated the Constitutional rights of Dr. Dew in order to get a conviction "at any cost". You will see and hear how the complainants, law enforcement, and the prosecution continuously changed their statements, introduced contradicting documents, withheld evidence from the defense to gain strategic advantage, modified the indictments on numerous occasions, including a major modification of the indictments on the morning of the first day of trial.
It is sad that Mahoning county has learned to accept corruption in government as a way of life.
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn." Prov. 29:2.
Ask yourselves why the Mahoning Valley is so corrupt the next time you go to the voting booth to re-elect the criminals now in office. We live in a republic. We can make a change for the better. We choose those who represent us with our vote. If you continue to support the criminals in office then you deserve the fruits of your own vote.
Posted on April 1 at 5 a.m.
Judge R. Scott Krichbaum was part of an act of public corruption in convicting an innocent man of alleged crimes that he did not commit.
During the sentencing procedures Judge Krichbaum compared Dr. Dew to a Nazi Death Camp Physician. His comments were not only inappropriate for a person of Judge Krichbaum's ethnic background, but completely ridiculous and preposterous. To try and associate Dr. Dew with Nazism and anti-semitism is more than "over the top" and is another demonstration of the prejudice of the trial court, prosecution, and law enforcement against Dr. Dew.
If you would like to know the truth... as recorded in the evidence of the prosecution, law enforcement and official dockets of the court go to http://www.FreeDrDew.com for the entire truth. The site is now under construction and should be nearly compete by Friday, April 4, 2008.
The site will make public evidence that was not presented during the trial to the jury because of the "politics" involved in the trial. The evidence will include recorded conversations between complainants and law enforcement officers, official court documents, signed affidavits by law enforcement officers, etc... Read and listen to ALL of the evidence and you will see that the outcome of the trial was manipulated and shaped by the trial court, the prosecution, and law enforcement.
You will see how public officials have abused the power of government, committed perjury, coerced witnesses, stacked the jury, and violated the Constitutional rights of Dr. Dew in order to get a conviction "at any cost". You will see and hear how the complainants, law enforcement, and the prosecution continuously changed their statements, introduced contradicting documents, withheld evidence from the defense to gain strategic advantage, modified the indictments on numerous occasions, including a major modification of the indictments on the morning of the first day of trial.
It is sad that Mahoning county has learned to accept corruption in government as a way of life.
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn." Prov. 29:2.
Ask yourselves why the Mahoning Valley is so corrupt the next time you go to the voting booth to re-elect the criminals now in office. We live in a republic. We can make a change for the better. We choose those who represent us with our vote. If you continue to support the criminals in office then you deserve the fruits of your own vote.