Comment history

Out-of-state dog owners claim remains of their pet

BY THE WAY HE STARVED THOSE PEOPLES PETS
THEN HE SHOULD GET THE SAME PUNISHMENT HE
DID TO THEM!!! HE SHOULD STARVE. AND COME
ON QUIT DEFENDING HIM THERE WAS NO EXCUSE
FOR WHAT HE DONE, AND IT ANGERS ME TO SEE
STUFF LIKE THIS.

November 3, 2008 at 7:39 p.m. suggest removal

Out-of-state dog owners claim remains of their pet

THIS MAN SHOULD NOT GET AWAY WITH MURDERING THOSE
BEAUTIFUL DOGS. HE SHOULD GET PUNISHED FOR WHAT HE
HAD DONE. IF HE KNEW HE DIDN'T HAVE THE MONEY OR HE
KNEW HE COULDN'T GET FOOD FOR THE ANIMALS THEN WHY
WOULD HE BRING THEM INTO HIS HOME? WHY COULDN'T HE
CALL THEIR OWNERS TO COME AND GET THEM? WAS HE JUST
SO WORRIED TO GET THEIR MONEY FOR KEEPING THEM THERE
AND MAKING THEM STARVE? HE SHOULDN'T EVEN BE RUNNING
A BUISNESS LIKE THAT IF HE KNEW HE COULDN'T FEED THE
DOGS. THAT IS SO SAD TO SEE THAT SOME PEOPLE DON'T
HAVE CARE TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT. HE SHOULD NOT BE
ABLE TO GET AWAY WITH DOING THAT. THAT'S JUST LIKE LETTING
YOUR CHILD GO TO CAMP WITH A WHOLE BUNCH OF FRIENDS
AND THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO FEED THEM ECT. AND THEY SAY
THAT THEY COULDN'T AFFORD THE FOOD SO YOUR CHILD IS
STARVING AND THE PARENT'S DIDN'T KNOW THAT UNLESS YOUR
CHILD IS SMART TO SAY SOMETHING BUT THOSE DOGS DON'T
TALK SO THEREFORE THE OWNERS WOULDN'T KNOW. THE DOGS
ARE THE CHILD THEY HAVE FEELINGS SO THEREFORE HE SHOULD
BE PUNISHED AS IF IT WAS A HUMAN. GOD BLESS THE FAMILIES
WHO LOST THERE PET.

November 3, 2008 at 7:31 p.m. suggest removal

News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2012 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: