Yes, any other course of action would be wrong, and God knows, people in public service jobs never do anything that's wrong. So because you say it's "Highly Unlikely" there should be no controls to make sure that it "Doesn't Happen".
OK Joe - we'll just trust ya. . . . . not.
What's of concern to me is what's best for Youngstown (and by extension - me and my family who live here). This is why residency needs to be a requirement.
December 19, 2013 at 2:18 p.m.
So - JoeFromHubbard, lets say the you live in Hubbard and you get a job with the Parks Department in the city of Youngstown.
Along comes the state of Ohio and they have grant money available for a new park. Both the city of Hubbard and city of Youngstown are vying for it and obviously, the parks departments of those respective cities are in charge of applying for and justifying why it is that each city should get this money more than the other.
Are you telling me that, as a member of the parks department in Youngstown you are going to give it your best possible effort to make sure that the city of Youngstown gets the park money rather than getting a brand new park in your own back-yard city of Hubbard?
The answer is "of course you wouldn't".
Employment residency is a necessity. If the city of Youngstown is not good enough for you to live in, you should get a job in Hubbard instead. Either way - you should have to directly live with the situation you create while doing your job. This is why residents of this city voted for this amendment. All these suburbanites are just fine coming into Youngstown to work and extract money, but it's a terrible dangerous place otherwise and they want nothing to do with it.
Cool - stay in your own little suburb and work there where you feel safe instead.
December 16, 2013 at 3:18 p.m.
What he is saying Silence, is this:
Since my opponent in the last election that I spent the better part of the last year smack-talking is going to be the next mayor and the "Mayors Secretary" holds that position at the pleasure of the mayor, I am going to resign before the new mayor takes office and kicks my ass out the door shortly after firing me!
December 3, 2013 at 2:45 p.m.
Hey RobX - sometimes an accident is just that - an accident.
Otherwise it would be called an "On-Purpose". And if you have never done something that you didn't mean to, you're a lucky guy, but the rest of everyone in the world have.
October 30, 2013 at 12:03 p.m.
I'm sure you're right.
October 28, 2013 at 5:46 p.m.
No point 76.
Ron Eiselstein (Utica-Shale - google his real name) this cities biggest "Know it all" is simply going to keep spilling his "I know better" and "you uneducated people" and "brain drain" crap until he's tired of talking. Unfortunately he never seems to get tired of hearing himself talk - God knows I do.
His pseudo-intelectual BS not withstanding, he clearly is the one who knows nothing. From his Shrimp Farm to his illegal Timbering to his portfolio of unpaid taxes to whatever his latest snake-oil campaign is, he just talks and talks and talks. . . . never listens - never takes his own advice and educates himself.
Sure wastes a ton of bandwidth here giving bad advice and idiot ass opinions to anyone who will listen (both of them).
October 28, 2013 at 3:48 p.m.
Actually Lyndsey Hughes does have evidence. The text messages that matter have not been released due to this being evidence in an on-going investigation.
DeMaine Kitchen paid his taxes only "because" he was running for mayor and knew it would be brought up (since he had never paid them before this the assumption is that he would not have other wise).
And McNally is not currently begin indicted - the charges were dropped due to lack of evidence. They can be re-filed, but as of yet - have not been. There is no current indictment.
What this means in English is that DeMaine did it and McNally has been accused of it, but is not being charged.
Quit voting by Race and start voting based on qualification and fact. Personally, I feel that neither of these ass-clowns should be running the city of Youngstown, but unlike the Vindicator, we are left with having to choose the lesser of 2 evils.
The lesser of these 2 evils is McNally. (I just threw up in my mouth a little bit while saying that - in case you were interested.)
October 28, 2013 at 10:33 a.m.
"The banks walk away from nothing , simple financing, they own nothing unless they buy the damn things"
Ron if you had the first clue you wouldn't have any idea what to do with it.
The bank owns the property until the mortgagee pays it off. The OWNER of record IS the bank you dip$hit. And they do not have to buy anything back to own it, they simply foreclose on it, which is the basis of this problem. They foreclose, write them off their books as a loss (making them more money) and then leave them to rot - all while the folks who live across the street from it get to look at it rot every day.
October 25, 2013 at 3:01 p.m.
Pretty good - I must admit.
October 25, 2013 at 2:42 p.m.
Answer is simple -
Vote for Chris Travers this November 5th. Problem solved - Chuck will then be retired - whether he likes it or not.
October 24, 2013 at 2:32 p.m.