Yesterday the Vindicator carried the story about a reserve deputy in Tulsa shooting a suspect by accident (an incident which happened a week or two ago), and today the Vindicator presents this story of the Dallas police shooting a suspect.
Here are six examples of recent incidents in which a police officer somewhere in the country was shot. None of these were reported by the Vindicator. Three of these I mentioned in a prior comment yesterday, and three I just found.http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/28/us/bost...http://www.kctv5.com/story/28266344/d...http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/26/us/...https://www.odmp.org/officer/22400-de...https://www.odmp.org/officer/22407-de...https://www.odmp.org/officer/22418-po...
Once again, can someone explain why the Vindicator feels it is important and necessary to carry stories from other states about officers doing the shooting, but does not feel that it is necessary to report on officers getting shot????
April 15, 2015 at 7:42 p.m.
Why do the irresponsible and blatantly stupid choices of other people create a "demand" for further spending of tax money taken from me??
April 14, 2015 at 10:11 p.m.
Here are three recent stories about police officers shot in the line of duty throughout the country:
I don't think the Vindicator present any of these reports.
Can someone explain why the Vindicator thought it was not necessary to present these stories; but then thought it was necessary to present the story about the Tulsa officer shooting a suspect??
April 14, 2015 at 9:25 p.m.
Does it occur to anyone that if the president and federal government have the power to ban something like this, a future president and federal government also have the power to mandate it??
April 9, 2015 at 2:13 a.m.
Why should the taxpayers have to pay for this????
April 5, 2015 at 5:20 a.m.
No Pookie, you are wrong (again).
I am quite conservative, and I do not blame the children at all. I blame the arrogant, ignorant, irresponsible "adults" who are cranking out babies that they are unable to care for.
If the "adults" would behave in a sane and responsible fashion, and stop making babies when they are not equipped to raise children, the remaining issues that might result in a child suffering in poverty (economic and other issues, other than the blatant stupidity of their "parents") could be easily mitigated by our society; which, by-and-large, is a very caring civil community.
Oh, and BTW, since you expect me to blame Obama..............admitting tens of thousands of homeless illegal alien children is not helping.
April 3, 2015 at 11:56 a.m.
I guess they all support the concept that:
A gay graphic artist should be required by law to design and print brochures for the Family Research Council. After all, if he is open for business to the public, he has no right to refuse service.
An African-American caterer should be required by law to serve food at the local KKK rally.
The Palestinian Muslim owner of a banquet hall should be required by law to rent his property to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee for a Israeli charity banquet.
The Protestant owners of a wedding chapel should be compelled to open their facility to a Satanic group for a wedding ceremony involving a mass marriage to Beelzebub.
The atheist owner of a billboard must be forced, by law and threat of fines, to offer the sign on his property for advertisement of services at the local Christ the Redeemer Church.
Apparently, according to the popular philosophy proposed, they are all open for business to the public, therefore they have no right to refuse service.
Personally, I disagree. I think all these people should be allowed to refuse to offer service and assistance to causes they do not support………….but apparently, I’m wrong.
April 1, 2015 at 9:09 p.m.
This entire article is nothing but mindless drivel.
What Doyle is suggesting is the same thing as saying a person who voted against a fire levy increase..... (perhaps because they felt the budget was already big enough or there was a better way to fund the service),......but who still lives in the district and pays the taxes, should be denied fire department assistance when their house is on fire; and that they're a hypocrite if they call 911.
Doyle is an absurd political hack.
April 1, 2015 at 8:14 p.m.
Excellent! This should cut down on the amount of my tax money being spent on food for the prisoners. Is there anything else we can do to encourage more of them to go on hunger strikes??
March 27, 2015 at 7:04 p.m.
Pookie,if you disagree with me, and agree with the assertions made by melissa, why don't you provide a factual basis that supports these assertions? Or are you just another mindless idiot who can spew insults but is incapable of providing facts to back up their worthless opinions? We're waiting....
March 23, 2015 at 6:57 a.m.