Stan, no one would ever consider legalizing animal-human marriages, nor multi-partner marriages, or whatever else your rhetorical argument can conjure. Argument flaw number 1 on your part.
Bible camp is a bigger slippery slide than gay marriage.
Also, I'm not the one misunderstands the meaning of marriage, if your belief is that 'marriage is for breeding,' because as long as the old, impotent and unwilling are allowed to marry, your definition is plainly WRONG (argument flaw number 2).
Please view the dozens of other countries allowing same-sex marriage. They have not fallen in the sea.
As for "gay marriage being all the rage," I don't know. I'm sure straight men aren't dropping their girlfriends, fiances and wives to go out and get one. However, the one thing you can't dispute is that you're on the losing end of an argument (number 3).
As for your blaring promotion of Exodus International, I'd be led to believe you're a supposed "ex gay." And I hope that's working out for you.. But if not, I hear there are some new gay establishments you might be interested in :)
And Rocco, what do you NOT get about the numbers? Gay marriage is inevitable, my friend. The majority is agreeing, no matter how loud and ignorant you would like to be.
Quite honestly, only in small-town Bible Belt cities, like Youngstown, do people still debate the validity of alternate lifestyles.
Fortunately, the people opposed to lifestyles unlike their own — the ones who still provoke these nonsense debates — are dying out.. and fast.
The proof is in the numbers. Look at the ratings in favor of same-sex marriage in EVERY STATE across America: they are on the rise year after year.
Second, the only agenda gays have is for equality.
And as for Exodus International, the American Psychiatric Association declared the ex-gay movement ineffective, if not completely unfeasible, YEARS ago. But people like Stan and Tomcat don't believe in legitimate research.
They like their facts and figures tweaked, falsified and completely untrue.
Posted on December 11 at 5:19 p.m.
Stan, no one would ever consider legalizing animal-human marriages, nor multi-partner marriages, or whatever else your rhetorical argument can conjure. Argument flaw number 1 on your part.
Bible camp is a bigger slippery slide than gay marriage.
Also, I'm not the one misunderstands the meaning of marriage, if your belief is that 'marriage is for breeding,' because as long as the old, impotent and unwilling are allowed to marry, your definition is plainly WRONG (argument flaw number 2).
Please view the dozens of other countries allowing same-sex marriage. They have not fallen in the sea.
As for "gay marriage being all the rage," I don't know. I'm sure straight men aren't dropping their girlfriends, fiances and wives to go out and get one. However, the one thing you can't dispute is that you're on the losing end of an argument (number 3).
As for your blaring promotion of Exodus International, I'd be led to believe you're a supposed "ex gay." And I hope that's working out for you.. But if not, I hear there are some new gay establishments you might be interested in :)
And Rocco, what do you NOT get about the numbers? Gay marriage is inevitable, my friend. The majority is agreeing, no matter how loud and ignorant you would like to be.
Deal with it.
Posted on December 11 at 12:45 p.m.
Quite honestly, only in small-town Bible Belt cities, like Youngstown, do people still debate the validity of alternate lifestyles.
Fortunately, the people opposed to lifestyles unlike their own — the ones who still provoke these nonsense debates — are dying out.. and fast.
The proof is in the numbers. Look at the ratings in favor of same-sex marriage in EVERY STATE across America: they are on the rise year after year.
Second, the only agenda gays have is for equality.
And as for Exodus International, the American Psychiatric Association declared the ex-gay movement ineffective, if not completely unfeasible, YEARS ago. But people like Stan and Tomcat don't believe in legitimate research.
They like their facts and figures tweaked, falsified and completely untrue.
Posted on September 28 at 1:34 p.m.
How is talking with a segment of the Youngstown-area population about their feelings on the economy considered "scaremongering"?
Quit trying to boost readership of your unwitty blog. Thanks.
Posted on August 26 at 2:02 p.m.
Bravo!
BRAVO!