@eivo,As you reject the notion of hiring temps, do you support the use of day-reports (on a temporary basis) to assist with manual county labor?
March 10, 2014 at 4:30 p.m.
Your attack/attacked protocol is of rather recent vintage, since at most the first of the year. Actually, I thought it might have been your New's Years resolution.
I've followed you since mid October of 2013, and your attacks were not so restrained then.
IMO what irritates people about you is that you are consistently commenting, basically repeating the same thing over and over. Someone has calculated that your average posting rate was 9 posts per day, since October. That would be OK if you were offering something new with each post, but most often that's not the case.
The thing is this: you seem to make your posts about you, rather than the subject.
March 10, 2014 at 4:17 p.m.
evio, you are deluding yourself if you think that you don't care what other people think.
If you did not care you would not have to name-call other or disparage. You would not have to argue. You would not have to concoct stories, or plagiarize.
If you didn't care, you could just state your opinion and move on to the next thread.
Simply being here and serially posting shows that you do care.
February 21, 2014 at 4:20 p.m.
Yes the evil one is at work again.
If he isn't creating his own fiction, he copies other people fiction.
Trolling is his game.
February 21, 2014 at 11:15 a.m.
I followed the biologic weapons trailers story closely. Here is what I remember: Powell and Chaney both insisted that they were for the production of anthrax and botulism.
In 2003 (reported in 2005) the pentagon produced a report titled"Final Technical Engineering Exploitation Report on Iraqi Suspected Biological Weapons-Associated Trailers" they concluded that the trailers that Chaney and Powell had found were actually manufactured in Great Britain for production of hydrogen and were impractical for biologic agent manufacture.
Powell later admitted that he was wrong.
Did Powell (and others) lie , or did they just want to believe something that would advance the agenda?
February 13, 2014 at 3 p.m.
Interesting question posed by Sensible;
Why ARE healthcare consumers in other countries better shoppers? Or are they? What do they know, or do, that we don't?
December 20, 2013 at 11:05 p.m.
76,Just to correct the record, what I said was that a provider MIGHT be contractually bound.
December 20, 2013 at 6:48 a.m.
Jerry, Sounds like when you are shopping you just have to be 'upfront and honest' to get the best information.
If you have the luxury of time to shop around, you should certainly do so. But don't anticipate that you are going to get a better discount than the insurance company.
As to the 'illegal' remark, well that's questionable. On the other hand, it wouldn't surprise me that a provider might be bound by contract such that they can not offer a self-pay fee less than the insurance negotiated fee.
December 19, 2013 at 7:51 p.m.
@Ksu..OUCH, being a little hard on 76
But I agree that she still doesn't have an answer.
Maybe she can do better with her " one standard for Congress and one standard for everyone else", with regard to obamacare.
December 18, 2013 at 8:18 p.m.
evio, Do you think that MacDonalds, etc are going to voluntarily do this?
Still violates your desire of no government involvement.
December 17, 2013 at 12:04 p.m.