- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
corner peel


6 bedroom, 8 bath


6 bedroom, 5 bath


6 bedroom, 5 bath

- Advertisement -

Comment history

We can fix Mill Creek now

Can we pave the roads first, then fix the park?

August 10, 2015 at 8:02 p.m. suggest removal

Ohio Democrats are flailing

I am not sure why yet, but I like Trump in the race. All the candidates had to re-write their speech material.

August 10, 2015 at 8:01 p.m. suggest removal

Volney Rogers was correct: Sewers polluted Mill Creek

The real problem was building the sewer system on the cheap and combining storm and sanitary sewers into one pipe system rather than two. That formula is impossible to predict and manage.

August 10, 2015 at 7:36 p.m. suggest removal

Anti-fracking amendment opponents say enough is enough

This story is pathetic. If enough people sign to have it on the ballot, it should be on the ballot. Just as Mayor John says it should. You can't complain if someone has more political will than yourselves. There might be something that you want put on the ballot some day. Just work to defeat it if that is what you want.

July 8, 2015 at 7:27 p.m. suggest removal

Rally against schools plan draws hundreds

Just sniping a bit I suppose, but I noticed the teachers were chanting using the word "ain't". This does not enlist any confidence..... lol

July 8, 2015 at 7:23 p.m. suggest removal

Parking situation – the unpretty lineman of downtown success

Absolutely, the parking deck was built with water fund revenue for "water customer usage". Look it up.

June 16, 2015 at 11:20 a.m. suggest removal

Parking situation – the unpretty lineman of downtown success

But, ssshhhhh. Let's not remind them..... :)

June 14, 2015 at 10:01 a.m. suggest removal

Parking situation – the unpretty lineman of downtown success

The problem Todd, is the source of funding to build the new parking lot. It came from the city's water fund. It is ILLEGAL to use water funds for economic development. The reason is that the water enterprise fund is a not-for-profit governmental agency. People from other cities provide much of its revenue. If the city uses the parking lot for anything other than water customers, they will quickly be sued by its neighboring communities. I suspect, that the city believes in time, that those communities will forget where the source of the construction money came from, but I doubt that after all of the hostile methods that Youngstown has used to force JEDZ agreements on its township and municipal neighbors. It is unfortunate that the businesses in downtown can not fund their own parking lot through private funds, but robbing the suburbs through inflated water prices will definitely create a legal fight that the city will quickly lose.

June 14, 2015 at 9:59 a.m. suggest removal

Schiavoni amendment to racino payment under consideration in Columbus

This is why we work deals out diligently BEFORE they are signed....

June 10, 2015 at 8:51 a.m. suggest removal



HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2015 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes