Rep, I don't know who's conversation you are trying to drag me into. Perhaps it is one of the other posts. Honestly, the question you are asking of me is comparing apples and oranges. It has nothing to do with the fact that same sex relationships are unnatural. After all, why not ask if stealing is natural? Or if adultery is natural? What's the point? Or is it just your way to attack Catholics because you think I'm one or you think you could get a rise from people?
It can't be any simpler than this, there is no species on the planet that can procreate with two of the same sex. The natural progression of life has a male and female. With humans that is the natural family unit. Without a male and a female the human race dies out. Hence, same sex relationships are deemed unnatural. That is pretty much as easy to understand as it can get. No religion, no complication, no confusion, just nature in it's simplest state.
Now, if you choose to be in a same sex relationship, that's your business. It's just not part of the norm. It is what it is...
March 5, 2014 at 8:32 p.m.
Actually, I haven`t replied to the question because it has nothing to do with the topic at hand or any of my posts.
Religion aside, the act of a male/male or female/female union is still UNNATURAL. Nothing, absolutely nothing can come of it.
March 5, 2014 at 4 p.m.
Normal means natural, according to the laws of nature. Nothing is normal, natural about a same sex union. Nothing comes from it.
March 5, 2014 at 11:58 a.m.
Never said illegal. Just not normal. Will never be natural. Don't pass it off as being natural. Nothing natural comes from it. Nothing ever will.
March 5, 2014 at 9:52 a.m.
Normal- definition- usual, ordinary, occurring naturally.
Nothing natural about homosexuality.
March 5, 2014 at 7:29 a.m.
...but it isn`t. So, what`s there to explain?
March 4, 2014 at 3:41 p.m.
I love these threads! Still trying to pass off abnormal as normal...
March 4, 2014 at 12:55 p.m.
Well then dontbea, your opinion is incorrectly founded. There is nothing in my posts to indicate anything other than my dislike for what it is called.
February 23, 2014 at 9:50 a.m.
Exactly. You formulated an opinion on one statement, which is an assumption. Not fact. Just like you incorrectly assumed that I was talking down to someone. All I meant was unless you read the bible, you may not be familiar with the particular bible verse. I typed the verse to show that anyone who was religious, or tried to be since no one is perfect, holds marriage sacred. As I stated earlier, if you support SS unions, so be it. Just don`t call it a marriage, because it isn`t. And don`t fool yourself into thinking it`s normal, because it`s not.
February 21, 2014 at 3:51 p.m.
Dontbea, there is the perfect example of making assumptions of other people. Your statement, “The bible says a lot of things that you and many others pick and choose which ones you want to follow.”
Do you know me? Are you assuming that I may be some religious poster spewing select bible verses to back my point of view? I never said that I was passing judgment on gays and lesbians, asking to round them up for extermination, just stating that it wasn`t normal.
So I guess you are no better than the others in the world who make judgments or formulate opinions on stereotypes or whatever the popular consensus at the time will say.
February 20, 2014 at 1:19 p.m.