- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
corner peel

South Beaver Twp

4 bedroom, 2 bath

New Middletown

4 bedroom, 4 bath


4 bedroom, 4 bath

- Advertisement -

« Polls

Do you support Obama’s health-care plan?

986 total votes


1cambridge(4153 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago

I voted yes only because it's a step in the right direction but only a small one. Until we switch to a single payer not for profit health plan we will continue to be ripped off by insurance companies.

Suggest removal:

2cambridge(4153 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago

You see a lot of baseless hysterical comments like the ones in posts 2 &3 on this thread. You see them from the GOP, Fox News, teabaggers and the insurance industry propaganda machine via commercials.

I would rather list some rational reasons with information to back them up.

First of all when America sets their mind to it they do anything as well or better than any other country.

You can use France as an example. It might seem like a silly example, for centuries France made the best wine on the planet. Then only a few decades ago wine makers in the Napa Valley California started growing the same grapes and making the same wines and now they are the the award winners and the best in the world.

The same thing can happen with health care. If we started by just copying what France does our health care quality would rise and the cost would drop.

France is ranked #1 in the world by "The World Health Organization". We are ranked #37.


Franc is ranked #1 in "Preventable Deaths". We are ranked #14.


France is ranked #3 in "Healthy Life Expectancy". We are ranked #24.


France is ranked #4 in "Health Performance". We are ranked #72.


No French citizens file for bankruptcy as a result of medical bills. More than 60% of Americans that file for bankruptcy do so as a result of medical bills and many of those had health insurance but couldn't cover their co pays or payment was denied by their insurer.


France spends 10% of their GDP on health care and it is included in what they pay in taxes. We spend 17% of our GDP for health care in addition to what we pay in taxes.

If we started a not for profit single payer system exactly like what France has we would pay only 10% of our GDP for health care and it would be added to what we pay in taxes. No matter how you cut it, it's better health care for less money.


Suggest removal:

3paulydel(1607 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago

This is not a step in the right direction. The government has never made a profit in anything they get involved with. It has only cost us the taxpayers more money. Worry about getting us more jobs and the rest will take of itself.

Suggest removal:

4cambridge(4153 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago

There are 36 countries in the world who have health care rated better than America's. The reason I used France as a model to copy is because they are ranked number one. If another country was ranked number one I would have used that country as the model.

Rudy....The taxes you refer too in France have nothing to do with what the French pay for health care. They pay 10% of their GDP and we pay 17%. See if you can figure out which is more.

Suggest removal:

5cambridge(4153 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago

;- (

Suggest removal:

6Stan(9923 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago



Suggest removal:

7paulydel(1607 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago

How can anyone indorse a plan that will cost the taxpayers money and that the congress won't even use? There is no government plan that has made a profit. This not the way to go and you should be upset enough to do what I did and call your state representative. The Representatives that do vote for this might as well pack their briefcases because if they are up for election in november they will most likely be gone.

Suggest removal:

8Letstryagain(218 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago

Regardless of your position on healthcare, and I think everyone is in favor of improving it, we need to examine how this bill was passed.

It turns my stomach that legislators use their vote for special favor districts. I know politics is a rotten game, but the way this bill was passed, the way the votes were obtained just stinks.

But hope springs eternal, and it is spelled November.

Suggest removal:

9Nunya(1356 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago


You're an asset to the nation and a gem hailing from the area.

This measure makes more than mere good impact for the things it enforces even in compromised form.

See we have to realize the intent of those bought and paid for shills in legislative seats tried to obstruct everything.

So in a gradual manner of not settling in an all or nothing manner. The only reason the public option isn't implemented right now is because of the power of the financial grasp. That health care brokers have on an array of shill members in legislative branch.

Rest assure that too is going to be implemented just as soon as the democrats shed the Dixiecrat's whom presented internal obstruction.

Which like the childish party of No republicans those Dixiecats have been identified and will surely be voted out of office at earliest electoral opportunity.

You surely has these whatnot's in knots with their inability to counter a thing you've told them.

They're even developing a " Go to France " talking point and they have no idea what they're stammering about,.. they're HILARIOUS !!!

Stay true, stay smarter and I'm honored having you as my fellow American.

Suggest removal:

10paulydel(1607 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago

The only step was in a cow pie because this is a lose lose situation that will cost us for generations to come. It not only reaches into our wallets but is one more step towards Socialism.

Suggest removal:

11Nunya22(315 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago

This is why online polls are no good I am able to come back and vote as many times as I want.

Suggest removal:

12Nunya22(315 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago

@USA1 The only poll I would say would be accurate would be a paper one with moderation.

Suggest removal:

13Nonsocialist(710 comments)posted 6 years, 4 months ago

The destructive forces of socialism have defeated the freedomophiles and liberty-mongers amongst us....for now.

Nonetheless, the liberal lies such as the infamous WHO rankings must be corrected.

From the attached WSJ link:

"Philip Musgrove, the editor-in-chief of the WHO report that accompanied the rankings, calls the figures that resulted from this step "so many made-up numbers," and the result a "nonsense ranking." Dr. Musgrove, an economist who is now deputy editor of the journal Health Affairs, says he was hired to edit the report's text but didn't fully understand the methodology until after the report was released. After he left the WHO, he wrote an article in 2003 for the medical journal Lancet criticizing the rankings as "meaningless."


Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes