It isn't worth it. You have a car payment and I don't think they worked all the bugs out yet.
No. If I ever get an electric car, it will be a Honda Clarity. It certainly looks nicer than the Volt: http://automobiles.honda.com/fcx-clar...
There is no way I'm paying 40,000 even with a 7,000 tax credit for a GM product when I can get a Lexus hybrid for that much and guarantee that I have a top quality vehicle. They won't sell enough to make it profitable and GM already has enough no profit cars including the Cobalt.
Erplane, the problem with your numbers are that you have not figured in the cost of charging the batteries after a few 20 mile trips. Now the gas engine did not start but that doesn't mean it was a free ride. Also, how long will the batteries last. Will they need replaced after those 6 years you mentioned? How many thousands of dollars will it cost to replace the batteries when they give out. Last but not least, where will the Volt be produced? In the US hopefully but no guarantee of that just yet.
A 20-mile trip? Under what conditions?Summer? OK. What about in one of our winters? Let's see, running the headlights eats some of that. So does running a defroster. What does that do to your range?How about a drive from, say, Boardman to downtown Y-town, in a February 'freezing fog', leaving out around 6:00am and coming back, with a stop at the grocery, getting in around 6:00pm. Let alone Canfield to Niles. These are not long trips, they are part of 'normal' commutes, and they happen at all hours and in all conditions of weather. Even windshield wiper motors require electricity to operate. You really expect to run all of these things off the battery and have no expectation that it will reduce your travel range?
Now let's talk about charging. Anyone familiar with the term ''demand meter''? Bet there are a few. Want to see the meter spike, and stay there all month? Betcha it will affect your power bill.
Oh, and by the way, there is not sufficient additional capacity on the power grid to service very many of these. If we were allowed to build power plants ..... but of course the sleazy liars of Greenpeace and other propagandists will never permit that.
This vehicle is the answer to a question no one asked. VERY few people will find it to serve their needs.
you certainly expanded the basic point I was trying to make. Generating that additional power is going to cost in resources as you alluded to.
We need to expand our drilling for natural gas etc. I understand that there is not a nationwide network of natural gas refueling stations but just as we did in the early 1900's we build the stations in and around the cities and then expand as the need grows. Besides, the cleaner burn of natural gas is what we need in the cities anyways.
I think our future needs a variety of energy sources, fossil fuel, natural gas, solar, wind, bio-diesel.
Of course before that happens we must deal with the dirtbags you mentioned!
Oh, there are ''five nuclear plants green-lighted''? Hmm. What are the chances that ANY of them will actually be built and put on-line in the next 5 years?? Since I worked up at Grinnell in Warren MANY years ago when the usual gang of screaming idiots shut down nuclear power plant construction, many built using components built right here in the Valley by us, and saw the plant shut down back around 1984, you'll forgive my skepticism. I know about construction projects, some near completion, that were shut down by screaming idiots, shyster lawyers, and judges with delusions of adequacy. Look up the history of WPPS some time. So you'll forgive my skepticism on that score.And having worked in engineering roles with several of the automotive companies, both the OEM's and the parts suppliers, I am far less trusting of the thoroughness of their testing. I've seen test reports within the last month that add to the skepticism.
Again, this mess is ''the answer to the question no one asked''. What may be appropriate for someone whose whole life exists within a relatively small area, may be utterly insufficient to others. Want to have three vehicles just to handle the different needs, or just one that adequately handles all of them? Most people have answered that question already.This entire thing is not a response to real customer demand, it is a bow to the self-appointed 'elites' with large mouths and small foreheads. And you know it.
I can assure you, many of us in northern California do not want, nor are interested in any type of electric car.
The first time you go to replace it's expensive battery, you'll think about putting that money toward something newer.
No, car companies now are already producing small, fuel efficient cars, Unless we live in downtown New York City or Los Angeles, it's not worth it.
I am a lifelong "car guy" and I am not interested in the Volt or any electric car, frankly.
Even Hybrids, the extra 1 1.5 extra MPG it gets over a similar conventional model, it's not worth the added $.
We tend to agree to disagree but it is nice to see a civilized discussion!
Give the tax credit as described to domestic products and tax the foreign products at a rate 4x higher than the current number. As a primary investor the fed government should have every right to do what they can to ensure success of companies they support financially. Things turn around quickly at that point.
Erplane, you also fail to add to your argument the fact that Obama has stated many times that we pay too little for electricity. His goal is to drastically increase rates will change the scope of your calculations. So even with increased gas $$ the same will hold true for electricity.As for the power plants, most of those "near green lighted projects" have been in limbo for years. Obama will make it nearly impossible to build one with emision standards strict enough to keep the wackos happy. As much as I'd like to see the Volt survive, I don't think we currently have the infrastructure to support it in mass. This vehicle is designed more for large metropolitain transportation (New York, Chicago, LA, San Fran, Huston, etc) outside of those metropolitan areas the gas guzzler is still the best option.
I agree with the posters who say that today's electric and hybrid cars are not for everyone. If you need a new car today and you drive a hundred miles a week those cars don't make much sense. A four cylinder car would serve you well. If you commute 2-3 hours a day hybrid is your car.
This technology is going to take off and these cars will be the future as they become more efficient and less expensive. The motto in "High Tech" is "every 18 months, twice as fast for half as much". The most optimistic forecasters predict that the WORLD will be out of oil in 40 years. This technology is our future and and is well worth the investment.
The "Volt" is the car that will bring GM back to solvency. Are you kidding? I haven't bought a 40K car ever! Check the latest conumer guide on dependability for all cars currently on the market. GM has serious problems with those models it now produces; would it be any different with the new "Volt"?
Amen to the $40K price tag not appealing to very many people no matter what the "tax credit" You still have to spend the money and have enough taxable income to make a tax credit worth anything. And as pwin above notes, GM has serious quality issues. For all the build-build-build comments on power plants and such - I just gloss over your ranting. Move to a cabin in Idaho where you'll fit in.
Heck NO!!! What about a family with 3 teenage kids (or more for that matter)? That is what these liberals in NY riding the subway and the dual income no kid liberals forget as well. Furthermore, I have to drive to work in whatever weather (not warm, sunny, Southern California) at whatever hours and be able to get there in my job. Finally, the cost does not work out, but don't worry, after Obama taxes the heck out of gasoline, it might. So much for not taxing the middle class. The sad thing is how many of you believed him.
Forgotten your password?