China rules out tech concessions

Associated Press


Narrow our trade surplus with the United States? No problem, say Chinese negotiators. But change technology tactics that are China’s path to prosperity and its rightful place as a global leader? Absolutely not.

China highlighted the sensitivity of the issue with its threat Sunday to scrap deals aimed at settling a trade dispute with Washington if President Donald Trump’s tariff hike on $50 billion of Chinese technology goods goes ahead.

It sheds more light on where President Xi Jinping’s government might compromise and where it rejects any challenge to a Communist Party-led model for technology development that it sees as hugely successful.

“Where China does not budge is in areas it considers to be its fundamental development strategy,” said Louis Kuijs of Oxford Economics, a former World Bank economist in Beijing. “If the U.S. is asking China to stop these industrial policies to become a global technology leader, that is where China says, ‘Look, that’s not possible.’”

The desultory end to weekend talks led by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and China’s top economic official, Vice Premier Liu He, revived worries Beijing and Washington are sliding again toward open conflict.

The dispute is in two largely unrelated halves: American frustration with China’s overall trade surplus with the United States – a record $375.2 billion last year and forecast to grow – and more narrowly focused complaints about Beijing’s technology policy.

China already agreed to address the first with a May 19 pledge to buy more American farm goods, energy supplies and other products.

That is fairly easy, say private sector analysts. Beijing can buy more U.S. natural gas and soybeans and less from Russia and Brazil. Its overall trade balance would stay the same.

The focus on China’s trade surplus is politically appealing, economists say, but distracts from goals that matter more to American companies and that Washington’s European and Asian partners support. Those include gaining the same access to Beijing’s markets that its companies enjoy abroad and improving protection of intellectual property such as patents and trademarks.

“The Trump administration’s fixation on the trade deficit is exactly where I think the Chinese would prefer to have this,” said Paul Haenle, director of the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy in Beijing. “It kind of lets them off the hook on these bigger, more important issues.”

Don't Miss a Story

Sign up for our newsletter to receive daily news directly in your inbox.