‘Birth’ bluntly tells of rebellion
By LINDSEY BAHR
AP Film Writer
“The Birth of a Nation “ has had more expectations placed on it than any movie could reasonably bear.
When the film about Nat Turner and his 1831 slave rebellion premiered at the Sundance Film Festival, it was held up, unfairly or not, as everyone’s great hope to save us from another year of #OscarsSoWhite. Some handful of months later, it became representative of something else when the focus shifted to the then little-known fact that its creator and star, Nate Parker, had a past that involved not only a rape allegation, but the eventual suicide of the accuser.
The fact is, “The Birth of a Nation” is a fine and promising debut from Parker, who also co-wrote and produced.
Parker follows Nat Turner from childhood to his death at age 31. Turner was hanged for the Virginia rebellion. Under the cloak of night, he and his fellow slaves went house to house slaughtering every man, woman and child who had a white complexion. It lasted 48 hours and over 50 people were killed. The incident was an early catalyst to the Civil War.
Out of necessity, “The Birth of a Nation” takes a lot of liberties with truths and unknowns about Nat Turner, fleshing out the skeleton of what the history books tell us.
Instead of having Nat being sold a number of times throughout his life, Parker keeps him with the same owner – the Turner family – throughout. Matriarch Elizabeth Turner (Penelope Ann Miller) takes a shine to Nat and helps to teach him how to read. While that part is true, keeping him with the same family allows Parker to show a young Nat (Tony Espinosa) being friends with his eventual master Samuel (Armie Hammer) from youth. He also gives Nat a lifelong nemesis in a slave tracker (Jackie Earle Haley), who, by the end of Nat’s life, will have run down his father and hurt his wife Cherry (Aja Naomi King).
Ultimately, it makes “The Birth of a Nation” less a good faith attempt at reconstructing Nat Turner’s life leading up to the rebellion and more a stylized fable, loosely rooted in an extraordinary true story.
Parker does, through a skillfully internalized performance, show the evolution of a radical through unthinkable dehumanization. Nat, who has taught himself to preach, travels from plantation to plantation with Samuel reading scripture to other slaves. It’s there he sees that not all are as relatively benevolent as the Turners. The images haunt him – from the a little black girl being led around on a leash to a man having his teeth hammered out. The horrors build inside the once docile Nat until erupting in a passionate sermon, and, eventually the uprising. It’s all juxtaposed with imagery of angels and dreamily remembered moments of a tribal leader telling a young Nat that he was destined to lead.
“The Birth of a Nation” hits all of these notes very bluntly. Many have already compared it to Mel Gibson’s “Braveheart,” which is apt. Roland Emmerich’s “The Patriot” is another. There is a better movie somewhere below the posturing. At this point, Parker is not yet as smooth a director as he is an actor, but that’s not likely to always be the case.