- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Warren homeowner says teen fatal shooting followed confrontation at house

Published: Thu, May 8, 2014 @ 9:23 a.m.


Trumbull County prosecutors may again have to ponder a case dealing with the rights of a homeowner to protect himself when faced with a threat to his safety.

This morning, a Warren police report regarding the noontime Wednesday shooting death of Kyran Adkins, 17, of Milton Street Southeast, reveals that the homeowner who shot Adkins to death said he fired at Adkins after a confrontation outside of the homeowner’s house.

The 32-year-old Brier Street man said he was inside his house and heard banging outside of the back of his house.

He heard the noise several times before grabbng his gun and going to the door of his house.

When the man “opened the door, a male wearing a red jacket with a gray hood had a gun in his hand,” the homeowner said.

“Another subject was behind the house and did not get a good look at him,” but the homeowner said he thought the second male was wearing a navy-blue jacket, the police report says.

The homeowner “said that he was startled once he seen the gun and fired his gun” and that both males ran toward Wick Street to the south.

Adkins continued about a block south, where he collapsed in the back yard of a house on Wick Street Southeast. He was pronounced dead later at ValleyCare Trumbull Memorial Hospital.

The second male, who a witness said had his hooded sweatshirt pulled up around his face, continued to run into the woods and had not been located.

Police have initially classified the case an aggravated burglary.

The case has similarities to two other cases involving homeowners defending themselves from intruders in the Warren-Niles area.

In the most recent case, four burglars were convicted in Trumbull County Common Pleas Court for their role in a July 12, 2013, burglary at a house on Niles Cortland Road in Niles in which the homeowner fired a gun through his front door, killing a fifth burglar as he tried to pry open the front door with a tire iron.

The homeowner, who said he awoke to the sound of burglars trying to get into the house, was cleared of any wrongdoing in the case.

The other involved a 52-year-old man who fired a gun at two Warren youths who were vandalizing a campaign sign in front of his Dover Street, Warren Township house, in October 2008.

In that case, the homeowner was eventually convicted of a felony of aggravated assault and placed on five years probation and ordered to pay restitution to the families of the boys, one of whom was shot in the arm during the incident.


1paulydel(1569 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

This is one of very good reasons to support the second amendment. This is a case of a bad guy having a gun and its a good thing that the good guy had one. We have a right to protect our lives and property. If you come on someone else's property the commit a criminal act then you know you are doing wrong and there will be consequences for your wrong doing. this should be a no brainer. Score one for the home owner.

Suggest removal:

2CongressWatcher(225 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

Good job homeowner. Cheapest solution to controlling crime is if the burglars and home invaders can just be shot dead on site. At least this one ran to another yard to bleed out. That was considerate.
There is a sure fire way not to get shot..... I can explain further if requested.

Suggest removal:

3redeye1(5514 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

Once again an intruder gets killed . When are these so-called tough guys going to learn that home owners are starting to fight back. But once again, You just cant fix stupid !

Suggest removal:

4billdog1(5416 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

No JS, a sure fire way to not get shot is to shoot first.

Suggest removal:

5DwightK(1520 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

So the wounded guy's friend ran off rather than try to help him or get help for him? He should be looking at a murder charge.

Suggest removal:

6billdog1(5416 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

When caught he will Dwight.

Suggest removal:

7prodgodq(170 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

My understanding of a situation like this is that it's considered self defense if the attacker is actually inside the house. This may be part of the problem legally....the homeowner fired through the front door. I suppose a good attorney could argue that it's not self defense in that situation. Of course, when a person thinks he's going to be shot and is terrified and shaking, I doubt they're going to go through some sort of legal checklist before they shoot. It's a sad situation all around.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes