- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Lawsuit challenging voting bills would force GOP to prove fraud

Published: Thu, March 6, 2014 @ 12:00 a.m.

Republican Gov. John KASICH HAS signed into law three bills that change the procedures for voting in Ohio. The measures were rammed through the GOP- controlled General Assembly, with proponents arguing, among other things, that they are designed to combat voter fraud.

Not surprisingly, Democrats have been quick to respond, accusing the Republicans who control every statewide administrative office and six of the seven Supreme Court seats of attempting to restrict voting.

The arguments from both sides should ring familiar. They have been used in previous battles over voting in Ohio.

The GOP contends that unrestricted access to the polls is a recipe for disaster; the Democratic Party counters that voter suppression is at the heart of the Republican campaign. It notes that urban areas are hardest hit by the changes in voting procedures, with black voters, who mostly support Democratic candidates, being dissuaded from going to the polls.

The three new laws enacted by Republicans in the state Legislature and signed by the governor have fueled another battle that will end up in court.

The Ohio Democratic Party, along with Cuyahoga County Executive Ed FitzGerald, are supposed to file a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the laws. They contend the measures violate the federal Voting Rights Act. FitzGerald is the expected Democratic nominee for governor.

Given the long-standing back-and-forth, a court of law is the appropriate venue for not only airing the arguments, but for an impartial ruling.


According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the effect of the Republican election reforms has been to eliminate Golden Week, the seven-day period during which voters were able to register and cast ballots at the same time; prohibit boards of election from mailing absentee ballot applications, leaving the duty in the hands of the secretary of state; and require more information on provisional ballots.

In addition, Republican Secretary of State Jon Husted has issued a directive eliminating in-person voting on Sundays. Husted points out that he sought recommendations from the Ohio Association of Election Officials, a bipartisan organization.

But the chairman of the Hamilton County Democratic Party, Tim Burke, counters that the elimination of Sunday voting ignores “the needs of the large urban counties,” according to the Plain Dealer.

As the battle between Republicans and Democrats is played out, we would hope that the issue of voter fraud takes center stage. Every state that has moved to make it more difficult for Americans to vote has used that argument.

And yet, there are no credible studies to support the claim that individuals not eligible to vote have been flooding polling places and casting ballots, thereby affecting the outcome of elections.

Nonetheless, Republicans continue to use the voter fraud canard. The time has come for them to put up their proof or drop their claim.

We have consistently argued that the world’s leading democracy, a beacon of hope for the masses living in closed societies, should have the highest voter participation rate, not one of the lowest.

Erecting barriers to voting is undemocratic. There already are enough safeguards to prevent the kind of wholesale voter fraud Republicans insist exists.


1SheDevil(120 comments)posted 2 years, 3 months ago

No, eivo, YOU are the joke.

Show me a person being PERMITTED to vote several times.

Your logic: "someone is permitted to exceed the speed limit, therefore I should not have to obey the speed limit."

More of your digital insanity.

Suggest removal:

276Ytown(1345 comments)posted 2 years, 3 months ago

The 2002 federal Help America Vote Act requires any voter who registered by mail and who has not previously voted in a federal election to show current and valid photo identification or a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document that shows the name and address of the voter. Voters who submitted any of these forms of identification during registration are exempt, as are voters entitled to vote by absentee ballot under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act.

Why the big stink about providing ID? Anyone who is eligible to vote should be able to provide this information unless they live under a rock or are hiding something. It's not a barrier, it's a safeguard to protect the integrity of the process. The argument that it hinders the poor or elderly from voting is lame. Chances are they are more likely to receive a government check which can be used as their ID than the general population . In America today, a photo ID is required to buy beer or cigarettes, get married, get on an airplane, or check out a library book.

Suggest removal:

3redeye1(5615 comments)posted 2 years, 3 months ago

She Devil You are the idiot , in the last election it was proven that a dozen voters were caught traveling between polling places voting under different names . This was reported in the Pa newspapers, not much was published around here though about it.

Suggest removal:

4jojuggie(1702 comments)posted 2 years, 3 months ago

After the last two posts, I think that SheDevil is a joke.

Evidently she doesn't watch TV or read the newspapers. There was voter fraud all over the nation after the last general election. It was even covered on MSNBC.

Suggest removal:

5SheDevil(120 comments)posted 2 years, 3 months ago

Reminder to eivo,

You said PERMITTED, in post #1.

That Richardson was convicted hardly suggests that she was PERMITTED.

Richardson broke the law, and will be punished for doing so. She is being punished because she was NOT PERMITTED to do what she did.
Your meme on the voter ID is misplaced here. None of the three ACTS that were just signed pertain to voter ID.
The acts address:
1) eliminate the seven day register and vote same day
2) Prohibit local BOEs from mailing absentee ballot applications
3) require more information (beyond government issued photo id) on provisional ballots

Suggest removal:

6eevo(51 comments)posted 2 years, 3 months ago

I voted for Romney 3 times.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes