- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Former judge wants off probation

Published: Tue, March 4, 2014 @ 12:05 a.m.

By Peter H. Milliken



A federal judge still hasn’t ruled on a request made almost two months ago by a former Mahoning County Common Pleas Court judge for an early end to her post-prison federal supervision.

Maureen A. Cronin, who was released from the Federal Correctional Institution in Greenville, Ill., on March 8, 2012, made her written request Jan. 6 to Akron-based U.S. District Judge Sara Lioi.

Judge Lioi had sentenced Cronin to 27 months in prison and fined her $4,000 after Cronin pleaded guilty to honest services mail fraud.

Cronin was charged with taking and failing to report an $18,000 no-interest cash loan from a local businesswoman, whose company had cases pending before her.

Cronin self-reported to the prison camp March 24, 2010, and was released March 8, 2012, “having received credit for good time,” Cronin wrote in her letter to Judge Lioi.

The federal judge had sentenced Cronin, 60, of Youngstown, to be on supervised released for three years, and Cronin has so far been under supervision for almost two years.

Justin J. Roberts, the assistant U.S. attorney who prosecuted Cronin, filed a written objection to Cronin’s request Jan. 22, saying reducing her supervised release time “is not in the interest of justice ... particularly in light of the serious nature of the underlying offense.”

Cronin “has not identified any burden the supervised release imposes upon her other activities,” Roberts added.

In her letter, Cronin told Judge Lioi she has complied with all rules and regulations, while in prison and on supervised release and that her probation officer is aware of and supports her early-termination request.

Her probation officer, Kevin G. Clements, could not be reached to comment.

Cronin told the federal judge she became executive director of the nonprofit Midlothian Free Health Clinic, which provides free medical services to uninsured people, on Dec. 1, 2012.

In that position, Cronin said she writes grant applications and does public speaking and recruiting “in hopes of growing the agency.”

When a reporter called her on a clinic telephone line, Cronin said: “You are calling a business line to ask a personal question. That is totally unacceptable. Have a good day.” She then hung up.

An earlier attempt by a reporter to reach Cronin on her home telephone line was unsuccessful.

As conditions of her probation, Judge Lioi said Cronin must:

Participate in an approved substance-abuse treatment program, including alcohol and drug testing, to determine if she has reverted to substance abuse.

Refrain from gambling or associating with those involved in that activity.

Provide her probation officer any financial information he requests and participate in any outpatient mental-health treatment he orders.

Remain in Northern Ohio unless Judge Lioi or her probation officer permit travel elsewhere.

Since her release from prison, Cronin told Judge Lioi she has volunteered at the Community Corrections Association in Youngstown, where she has helped women make the transition back into the community and developed “a curriculum to train caregivers and social workers working with children of incarcerated parents.”

“She did a great job,” said David Stillwagon, CCA chief executive officer, who supervised Cronin’s work there. “She was able to effectively reach out to the women within the halfway house.”

Cronin was “able to share her real-life experience and what it is that she had to do in order to effectively reintegrate back into society,” Stillwagon added.

In her letter to Judge Lioi, Cronin cited a June 24, 2010, U.S. Supreme Court decision rendered while she was incarcerated, which said the honest-services fraud statute “is properly confined to cover only bribery and kickback schemes.”

Based on that decision, Cronin said her conduct “may not be interpreted as a violation of that statute,” but she chose not to appeal to vacate her plea based on that decision.


1wastepro(47 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

Can a convicted felon be in a position of authority for a Non Profit?

Suggest removal:

2kensgirl(925 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

Formerdemlib just said what everyone else is thinking. He has the b**** to say it. Mahoning County is still rift with political hacks and wannabes. It's passed down from generation to generation like a virus. Sad but true. I do hope Maureen does well though. She's one of the few who admits wrongdoing and takes the punishment. Not too many like her around these parts.

Suggest removal:

3fcb(417 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

She did not get a $18,000 loan! She took a $18,000 bribe!! Also, the comment from "legaleagle". Sounds like you might be a lawyer and maybe want to get in on one of these judges positions so you can get yourself a,what did they call it, oh yea, a "LOAN"

Suggest removal:

4Roger_Thornhill(971 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

"That is totally unacceptable. "

So is taking bribes. Keep her on probation.

The reason she did not seek to have her sentence vacated is because she did not want to have all the facts come out of what she did.

Suggest removal:

5walter_sobchak(2418 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

You make a good point about the disgraced Judge Cronin as some want "mercy for me but judgement for thee". However, she was an elected official who took an oath of office, accepted a "bribe" from a party that had business in her court. She knew what she was doing and threw it all away. I have little sympathy for her or any elected official with such ethics. You say she has done her "time", but not completely as she was released with a term of three years probation, which she is trying to have removed. She would best stay on probation for the entire term so that she would not be permitted in the new racino in Austintown. It would be prudent.

Suggest removal:

6dmacker(410 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

Forgiveness perhaps but no forgetting that in a position of public trust she violated that trust for personal gain.
My own experience with the former judge was that on the bench she was pious, vindictive and unforgiving.
She was never above threatening those before her court as witnesses or defendants.
She got what she deserved.
End of story.

Suggest removal:

7YtownParent(744 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

As @dmacker points out Cronin was no different than most sitting judges: "pious, vindictive and unforgiving" aka: arrogant. She's just being judged by the others by the standards she set, which the last time I checked is what Jesus Christ said will happen.

I find it interesting that she pointed out a legal strategy & Supreme Court decision where she could have moved to have her verdict vacated, and wants credit because she hasn't done so yet. I won't be surprised if she does sue when her times all up, whether fully serviced or not, and seeks to have it vacated and expunged so she can run for the same position she abused again.

Suggest removal:

8JoeFromHubbard(1532 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

>>A federal judge still hasn’t ruled on a request made almost two months ago<<

How slowly the wheels of justice turn.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2015 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes