facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Given antics of his predecessors, Obama is hardly worst president



Published: Mon, July 14, 2014 @ 12:00 a.m.

Given antics of his predecessors, Obama is hardly worst president

I have read and seen on televi- sion the results of a recent poll that found the majority believed President Obama to be the “worst president” since World War II.

Let’s look at some postwar presidential facts.

Republican President Richard Nixon and his Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned from their offices just before impeachment and imprisonment.

Republican President Ronald Reagan had Iran-Contra, savings and loan crimes, Pentagon and HUD scandals that cost taxpayers millions of dollars.

Democratic President William Clinton’s escapades in the Oval Office cost taxpayers millions of dollars and resulted in no impeachment proceedings.

Republican President George Bush had Enron, Tyco, World Com, Abramoff, Madoff, and Scooter Libby and everyone went to jail. Not to mention the phony facts that led to the Iraq War, which cost trillions in dollars and thousands of American and Iraqi lives. These are facts.

All Obama and his administration want to do is feed the poor, heal the sick, extend unemployment benefits, guarantee equal pay for women, and fight fewer wars, which save us money and lives. And the people feel these are scandals and he is the worst president since 1945? The scandal is that Congress is thwarting his every effort.

The questions to be asked here are: How intelligent were these people (must have been Republicans) or what planet were they from?

David P. Gaibis Sr., New Castle


Comments

1Photoman(1000 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Thank you very much for defending the President of the United States of America. I do hope that reality will arrive in your world in the very near future.

Suggest removal:

2borylie(790 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Surely Mr.Gaibis you're letter is in jest. While I'm lmao because this is so funny you or any liberal/democrat ideologue can't be serious.

Suggest removal:

3steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

David,
You can't be serious. You must have written this letter just to get a reaction. This Liar is the worst POTUS since the Revolutionary War, let alone WWII. Fast and Furious, Benghazi (What difference does it make, IRS scandal, release of 5 terrorists from Guantanamo, Liar care debacle, immigration disaster, War on Coal, Keystone pipeline. Everything this Liar touches is a disaster.

Suggest removal:

4JMHO(144 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

How do you type the sound of a cuckoo clock?

Suggest removal:

5Knightcap(695 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Hey David, weren't you on "Last Comic Standing" doing these Obama shticks. I don't think these posters know who you are but you are hilarious. Your description of Obama is great. Really shows he's in the wrong line of business. He was made out to be a community organizer, missionary, or peace corps worker, not the president of the United States. Obama would also be a hit on the Liar's Club" show.

Suggest removal:

6steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Well last year he won the Lie of the Year award for "if you like your health insurance you can keep your insurance, period. Maybe he can go for a REPEAT this year for "not even a smidgeon of corruption" in the IRS.

Suggest removal:

7eagleye(59 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

What are you smoking, dude? Been to planet earth lately? Tell me....name a President in history that KNOWINGLY appointed Marxists, Communists, and thugs to high government positions? How about Van Jones (Communist), Anita Dunn (Marxist), to name a couple. You obviously don't read the right newspapers, or watch TV, unless its MSNBC which is the Obamunist Network. Get a grip, fool. You really don't know what you're talking about at all.

Suggest removal:

8lajoci(206 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Forget about trying to make sense to these Yahoo's, Dave. They hate the President, pure and simple, and their puerile fantasy is to see Obama impeached, out of some perverse sense of "fair and balanced," I guess.

Who knows?

They give him zero credit for the accomplishments of his administration, because they don't care what he does.

They hate him for what he is, and for what their fantasies of him are. Simple as that.

That one lunatic's mindless repetition of "What difference does it make?" says it all -- in their fever to denigrate the President, they attribute to him things he never said, or they rip words out of context in a perverse game of NIGYSOB (look it up).

The cacophony of mindless slogans repeated ad nauseum by the right-wingnut tea-bagger cement-heads is not even the least little bit interesting anymore.

Ignore them, Dave, as one ignores the braying of barnyard beasts, or the chortlings of roosting birds.

Suggest removal:

9steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

There you go Dave. You have found one left wing looney to support your extremist left wing position.

Suggest removal:

10lajoci(206 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

The right-wingnuts HATE the FACT that unemployment is DOWN to 6%.

The right-wingnuts HATE the FACT that Barack Hussein Obama made sure that Osama Bin Laden (who could have been re-named Osama Been Forgotten for all the attention he got from the Bushies) was hunted down and killed.

The right-wingnuts HATE the FACT that the economy under this President has been brought back from the brink -- instead of plunging over the precipice into a full-blown depression.

The right-wingnuts HATE the FACT that this is the 1st President to successfully begin the reform of our broken health insurance system, a system that left 40 million UNINSURED and benefitted only the for-profit insurance companies.

The right-wingnuts HATE the FACT that this President has diligently pursued policies that protect clean water and air, because right-wingnuts love of poisonous air and water, I guess.

And the list of FACTS about this President that righ-wingnuts HATE goes on and on, like a broken record, as they repeat slogans and catch-phrases that bear no relation to reality, but serve only to insult our President. The concept of loyal opposition is lost on the right-wingnuts, who wallow only in the "opposition" part.

Why?

Because the right-wingnuts HATE our President!

Because the right wingnuts HATE America!

Shame on the disloyalty of the right-wingnuts!

Shame!

(The right-wingnuts need to go BACK TO SCHOOL for instruction on what civics is and how to be good citizens and how to practice good citizenship, because, obviously, they missed it the 1st time around.)

Suggest removal:

11steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

The left wing loonies don't care that a border agent was killed by a gun that was run from Fast and Furious.

The left wing loonies don't care that we were told we could keep our insurance if we liked it period.

The left wing loonies don't care that 4 Americans were killed in Benghazi. In fact they say "what difference does it make"

The left wing loonies don't care that the IRS is used for political with hunts. I wonder how they would feel if they were the ones being audited?

The left wing loonies don't care that 5 terrorists were released from Guantanamo to rejoin the fight.

The left wing loonies don't care that the President makes up the laws as he goes along and enforces only those laws that he likes. Thank heavens for the Supreme Court.

The left wing loonies don't care that the coal industry is being killed for no reason at all.

The left wing loonies don't care that the Keystone Pipeline is still not being built for a new source of oil.

The left wing loonies HATE America.

Suggest removal:

12stievo(17 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

and I steivo and my Tea Party HATE minorities and the poor. Rand Paul 2016

Suggest removal:

13steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

ding ding ding, give stievo a kewpie doll for being the first poster to play the race card today. Eric Holder would be proud of you.

Suggest removal:

14stievo(17 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Yes I am talking to myself again. Being bi-polar is a beeotch. We love Fox News. Palin is our idol. I need a third personality, steivo is boring me.

Suggest removal:

15cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

All of these haters voted for bush who inherited the strongest economy this country has ever seen along with the formula for paying off the national debt and he blew it. His economic policies wrecked the economy and drove the DOW down to 6,500. Under Obama's economic policies the DOW closed today over 17,100.

These haters also voted for bush's father who was part of the the saint reagan administration. When Obama took office the country was losing 700,000 jobs a month. Because of Obama's policies more net jobs have been created during his administration than bush the father and bush the idiot son combined.

Speaking of saint reagan, the previous Democratic President Clinton's administrations policies created more jobs than reagan, bush the father and bush the idiot son combined.

The teabagger/republicans brag about polls of 1500 or less people and ignore elections where more than 120,000,000 voted and Obama won by landslides. He would win another election tomorrow because the teabaggers have no one to run against him.

Suggest removal:

16theoldwrench(240 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

The RW loony' s can't understand that the new abundance of NG is the biggest enemy of coal.If RW loony's really want to help the coal industry they should use coal to heat their homes, The 10s of thousands new job's created would far outnumber the KS pipeline would create Why weren't the RWL concerned about the hundreds of dead Americans in previous embassy attacks before 2009. If RWL want to stop the use of E.O. sit down and do their job's The RWL don't care about the 40M w/out H.I. only the 5M who probably have better ins now. Imagine RWL reaction if the President could have gotten the pow released but didn't take it. The RWL will not understand the pipeline will not help the US and only Canada and China will profit from it. If they really want to get the pipeline then support the Dema amendment that the oil can only be used in US.

Suggest removal:

17steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

The LWL can't understand that COAL IS NOT BAD. Our electricity rates are increasing because the Liar wants to remove the last speck of dust from the air (as soon as it rains the last speck of dust will be removed anyway). The LWL don't understand that the oil from Canada is going to reach the market whether they like it or not, it is only a matter of the means of transportation of that oil. Its either the pipeline or trucks and trains. The LWL don't understand that the so called POW was a deserter and was merely used an excuse to begin the shutdown of Guantanamo by releasing all of the terrorists.

Suggest removal:

18stievo(17 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Global warming has be defeated! MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

Suggest removal:

19steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE.

Suggest removal:

20lajoci(206 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Right on cue, no rebuttal, just a re-hash of right-wingnut talking points, lies, and distortions.

"a border agent was killed by a gun that was run from Fast and Furious."
Never proven; ballistics analysis - inconclusive. Still, this badly conceived program to trace illegal guns began in 2006, before Obama.

"we were told we could keep our insurance if we liked it period."
What he should have said was "You can keep your insurance unless it's JUNK, then no - you have to get a valid policy."

"what difference does it make"
We hear this slogan ad nauseum. Neither left-wing loonies, nor Democrats, nor the President EVER said this -- in FACT, Hillary said this in response to questions in a hearing: "With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator." Was she was referring to the deaths themselves? No! Shame on you!

"the IRS is used for political with hunts. I wonder how they would feel if they were the ones being audited?"
Actually, "left-wing" groups WERE AUDITED, TARGETED BECAUSE OF KEY WORDS IN THE NAMES OF THEIR ORGANIZATIONS. So get over it! (Right-wingnuts' paranoia is legendary. Everybody is always out to get them.)

"5 terrorists were released from Guantanamo to rejoin the fight."
HA! Gitmo should have been closed years ago, or never opened! It was full of ordinary blokes who were fingered by rivals in their home countries as an easy way to get rid of opponents, or, indeed, anyone they had a grudge against. Sickening that without trial, we have no way of knowing whether these miserable creatures were dangerous or not, except to say that they must be guilty of something since they obviously were arrested and thrown into the hoos-gow.

"the President makes up the laws as he goes along and enforces only those laws that he likes."
Executive actions and signing statements, like Bush 43, Clinton, Bush 41, and the list goes on. Get real!

"the coal industry is being killed for no reason at all."
So, here is what it is all about -- another shill for the fossil-fuel industry trolls newspaper sites churning out PR for the coal and oil companies. Rather than an ideologically pure right-wingnut, here is a paid hack. Sad.

"the Keystone Pipeline is still not being built for a new source of oil."
I don't know about other "left-wing loonies," but this left-wing looney (me) thinks that if more pipelines are NEVER built, it will be too soon.

"The left wing loonies HATE America."

It's pretty obvious who the haters are, don't you think?

Suggest removal:

21stievo(17 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

That information wasn't acquired through Fox News was it? THEN I DON'T BELIEVE IT!

Suggest removal:

22stievo(17 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Oh yeah, what difference does it make if the emperor isn't wearing clothes in Benghazi at an IRS witch hunt?

Suggest removal:

23jeffrey(4 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Did not realize there were so many uneducated people still believing the right wing garbage fed them. Until some of these people can learn to decipher the truth from the right wing lies and false accusations, then they will continue to write their "clever" responses to someone that speaks the truth. Good letter Dave but it seems most responses come from the right wing nut bigots. I usually do not respond but thought you should know there are many of us that feel like you. Now, we wait for my attack from the nut cases and how I am some un-patriotic American....

Suggest removal:

24steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

The Dumocratic obstructionists are at it again:
"WASHINGTON – Democratic opposition increased Wednesday to legal changes that would speed removals of young Central American migrants, jeopardizing President Barack Obama's call for $3.7 billion in emergency border spending to deal with the remarkable surge of unaccompanied youths at the South Texas border."

Suggest removal:

25steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

"Still, this badly conceived program to trace illegal guns began in 2006, before Obama." More blame Bush.

"What he should have said was "You can keep your insurance unless it's JUNK, then no - you have to get a valid policy." False, but a fine left wing talking point.

"she was referring to the deaths themselves?" I know.

"Actually, "left-wing" groups WERE AUDITED" Yeah, about 1 for every 100 conservative groups. Another fine left wing talking point to obfuscate.

"HA! Gitmo should have been closed years ago, or never opened! It was full of ordinary blokes who were fingered by rivals in their home countries as an easy way to get rid of opponents, or, indeed, anyone they had a grudge against." So America are the bad guys and the terrorists are the good guys???

"So, here is what it is all about -- another shill for the fossil-fuel industry trolls newspaper sites churning out PR for the coal and oil companies. Rather than an ideologically pure right-wingnut, here is a paid hack."
This is entirely false but very indicative of how the left wing extremists start with personal attacks when the hear something they don't agree with.

"I don't know about other "left-wing loonies," but this left-wing looney (me) thinks that if more pipelines are NEVER built, it will be too soon."
Try to get it through your thick skull. The oil from Canada is going to get to market whether Tom Steyer likes it or not. It is only a matter of what means of transportation is going to be used.

It really is pretty obvious who the haters are!

Suggest removal:

26stievo(17 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Oh yeah, what difference does it make if the emperor isn't wearing clothes in Benghazi at an IRS witch hunt?

Suggest removal:

27steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED - WMD'S - DUBYA

Suggest removal:

28Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

My guess is Mr. Gaibis is is complacent with the current administration because he is obviously willing to "toe the party line" in true "Saul Alinsky" fashion. Remember Alinsky's rule: "Ridicule is mans most potent weapon". So, Mr. Gaibis, if you are good with the "socialist" direction this Country is headed in, with all of the "government entitlements" you list, I hope you don't have children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren who will be paying for those programs, long after we are gone. Furthermore, the one thing that America should fear from this current administration is it's willingness to "target" it's critics with investigations by numerous Federal agencies, thereby causing many who would speak out against the government, to reconsider the value of doing so. And that, my friends, is the beginning of "tyranny", something we should all be terrified of. So, all in all, considering all of the "antics" of prior administrations, I can find none that were so willing, like the current one, to trash the Constitution, and be so blatant in doing so.

Suggest removal:

29dontbeafool(885 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

sounds like fear mongering at its best.....

Suggest removal:

30walter_sobchak(1895 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

I absolutely love reprints from The Onion!

Suggest removal:

31Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

How 'bout ole Hussein claiming the "world is more tranquil" since he's been in office! Hey DUDE, ever hear of Ukraine or Israel, or what about your own claims that all the kids are fleeing Central America because of the horrible violent conditions, there? Once again, what mainstream media outlets will have the veracity to ask those questions? I can only think of one.

Suggest removal:

32steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

You got that right Chessie. There is not one single solitary place where the world is more tranquil since this Liar took office, but then "what difference does it make?"

Suggest removal:

33dontbeafool(885 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Yes, because the middle east, Isreal, and Central America were all at peace under Republican leadership. You two are whackos. There has always been conflict and crime there.

Suggest removal:

34Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Aha! Another "Alinsky-ite" chimes in! Can't substantiate Husseins "B.S." so resort to "ridicule". Face it, every time Hussein opens his mouth, he sticks his foot in it. "The world is more tranquil...." and the next day almost three hundred innocent souls are shot from the sky, over that "tranquil" Ukraine/Russia border and Israel is forced to take action against the "tranquil" Palestinians who hide the missiles they continue to fire into Israel, in schools full of children. Yeah, nothing but "rainbows and unicorns" in Husseins version of the world, so let's go campaign, shoot some pool and drink some beers!

Suggest removal:

35steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

The plane shot down in the Ukraine is Bush's fault.
The Palestinians firing missiles into Israel is due to global warming.
What difference does it make?

Suggest removal:

36lajoci(206 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Steivo LIES about what Hillary said, and then has the GALL to call anyone else a liar! You're the liar, Steivo!

The war criminals in the BOOOOsh administration have the blood of 35,000 American casualties on their chicken-hawk fingers, and Steivo and the other right-wingnut whack-oes have the gall to repeat "Benghazi!" ad nauseUm!

Barack Hussein Obama has effectively saved the lives of thousands of American soldiers by pulling us out of those wasteful nightmares (when the McCains and Romneys of the lunatic "right" would have fed more of our boys into the meat-grinder), and all Steivo and the whack-oes can think of is a Hillary mis-quote!

Whack on, whack-oes!

Suggest removal:

37steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

I love how Iajoci calls me out for lying and then in the same post proclaims that there were war criminals in the Bush administration. And the the whacko of all whackos calls others one at the end!

Suggest removal:

38dontbeafool(885 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Bottom line is you are a liar. I noticed you didn't dispute that fact.

Suggest removal:

39steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Are you trying to give Iajoci a run for whacko of the year?

Suggest removal:

40IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

The country is much better now than it was. When Obama took office the economy was in its worst shape since the Great Depression.
The greatest intelligence failure in the history of the WORLD occurred under Bush on 9/11 costing thousands of American lives..
4 people died in Benghazi, over 4,000 AMERICANS died in Iraq in Bush's fictitious war of Weapons of Mass Destruction.
ObamaCare is a success as it has insured over 8 million more people all while decreasing health care impact on GDP.
Bush embraced illegal immigration, he said, "many of these people are here doing jobs that most Americans don't want to do."
The stock market is at an all-time high!!
Unemployment is DOWN (even though congress refuses to pass a jobs bill.)
Bin Laden is DEAD
GM is ALIVE
The Republicans wanted illegals here to break unions and drive wages down and that is what killed the middle class.
The poll that said Obama is the worst President since WWII is the same one that said Mitt was going to win the election.

Suggest removal:

41steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

The percentage of the population receiving food stamps is at an all time high.
The percentage of people on welfare is at an all time high.
The percentage of people on disability is at an all time high.
The percentage of people working is at an all time low.
The national debt is at 17.5 million.
Illegal immigrants are flooding across the border.
Nearly 50% of the population pays no income taxes at all.
You left wing loonies can spin it all you want, but the reason the Liar was voted the worst POTUS since WWII is because its true.

Suggest removal:

42lajoci(206 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Spin? Who said anything about "spin?"

You lie! Period!

The % of people on food stamps is at an all-time high because the job creators ain;t creating jobs!

What part of not enough jobs don't you get?

And the number of working poor on food stamps is at an all-time high!So, the job creators ain't creating jobs that people can live on!

Matter of fact, the % of people on welfare is NOT at an all-time high, and hasn't been since the welfare reforms OF THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION reduced welfare rolls.

You really need to go back to school and try to learn something. Your ignorance is exceeded only by your capacity for lying.

Suggest removal:

43Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

"the job creators ain;t (sp) creating jobs"...gee pa, why might that be? It's been six years now since Hussein has had the reigns of this Country, and apparently (according to lajoci's comments) he has been unable to create an economic climate where the "job creators" are comfortable in creating jobs. As a matter of fact, he has done the opposite, with all of his entitlements and "wealth distribution" policies. I can't blame any business for not hiring or cutting back, given the burdens Hussein has created for business in this Country, the most notable being "HusseinCare".

Suggest removal:

44handymandave(459 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

If Obama is not the worse President the United States Has had, I don't know what more or little he can do to prove it. He does have two more years though to thoroughly screw things up more.

Suggest removal:

45cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

More net jobs created during Obama's administration than the administrations of bush the father and bush the idiot son combined.

As how the American people vote, they voted Obama President of the United States of America by landslides twice and would do the same today because you teabaggers have no one to run against him.

You lost big time both times. Get over it.

Suggest removal:

46Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

It doesn't matter if the Bushes created ZERO jobs, what matters is NOW! And you libs need to decide on a "talking point". "Not enough jobs" or "more "net" jobs", pick a stance and stick to it. Seems like the only argument you can put forth is the "blame Bush" one, 'cause the facts show otherwise.

Suggest removal:

47steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

"Seems like the only argument you can put forth is the "blame Bush" one" Don't forget the good old reliable "It's due to global warming"

Suggest removal:

48borylie(790 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Democrats/ Liberals. Republicans/ Conservatives. Which one is closer to Communism?

Suggest removal:

49IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION - A way for the Republican Party to drive down wages and bust unions.

DISAPPEARANCE - That is what happened to the middle class after all the illegals came to the U.S. over the past twenty years.

Suggest removal:

50Askmeificare(700 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

As a white midle aged male, I say:

Give MY PRESIDENT OUR PRESIDENT a 3rd and 4th term. He has done an exceptional job and beat many odds against him.

Truly a great man.

I feel sorry for those hard working taxpayers who do not support him. How blind they are.

Suggest removal:

51walter_sobchak(1895 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Whether or not Obama is the worst president since WWII will take a some time to evaluate after he has completed his term. But, he truly has a way to go to be worse than Jimmy Carter, who was truly feckless and a clown. Made the US an embarrassment on the world stage. Say what you want about Reagan, he was presidential and a leader who backed up his words with actions. And, that is the problem with Barack Hussein Obama. He doesn't truly grasp the actual meaning of the Office of President of the United States. A diplomatic outpost in Benghazi is attacked a four Americans killed, he campaigns the next day in Denver. Draw a red line in Syria, and when it is crossed, do absolutely nothing. Our only democratic ally in the Middle East, Israel, continues to get shelled on by the terrorist group Hamas, diss Prime Minister Netanyahu. A civilian airliner gets blown out of the sky by Russians using Russian missiles and technology, go to a $32000 a plate fundraiser. Tens of thousands of immigrant children cross the border in Texas but he goes to Texas for campaigning alone!

Now, time will tell if his terms will transform the country, especially with respect to ACA. I doubt it will be for the better.

Suggest removal:

5276Ytown(1233 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

The "party" president! Actually, he left the White House the morning after Benghazi for campaigning in Las Vegas then on to Colorado. We finding out that he was MIA that night and missed the previous 5 days of intelligence briefings. . Almost 400 fundraisers in six years and 176 rounds of golf. That's where his priority lies.

Suggest removal:

53steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Just 2 1/2 more years and he is back to being a community organizer.

Suggest removal:

54IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Obama's best asset is his ability to make a bunch of sore losers CRY.

Elected TWICE by MAJORITY vote.
THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN!!!!!!!

Suggest removal:

55steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

SO WAS NIXON!!!!!!

Suggest removal:

56Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Hussein acts "decisively" to protect "gay and transgender" federal workers from discrimination, yet fails to secure our borders, and has only empty rhetoric when it comes to the situation in the Ukraine and Israel/Gaza. Actions like these are the reasons our enemies think we are a "joke" and continue to act out their aggressions on the world stage, without fear of retribution. They see Hussein decimating our Military, apologizing and bowing down to radical leaders around the world, negotiating with and releasing terrorist leaders for a probable Military deserter, taking over two years to respond to the murder of a U.S. Ambassador in Libya, (and initially lying to the American people, about it) and unable to take care of our own border security, so what's to fear? Yeah, the "world is more tranquil" since Husseins been the supposed "leader of the free world".

Suggest removal:

57lajoci(206 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

"taking over two years to respond to the murder of a U.S. Ambassador in Libya, (and initially lying to the American people, about it)"

See how the baggers resort to lying themselves, even as they accuse the President of lying?

Obama is ON VIDEO, THE NEXT DAY, IN THE ROSE GARDEN, specifically referring to Benghazi as an "act or terror."

Them's the very words he used!

"act of terror"

And still, the baggers, in all their blind hatred of the President, refuse to tell the truth!

What part of "act of terror" do they not understand"

"act?" "terror?" "of?"

Criticize the President if you will -- that is your right as an American citizen; but don't expect to be taken seriously if you continue to lie.

Lying is wrong. Stop it.

Suggest removal:

58IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

The Republicans brought the Latinos across the borders for the last 20+ years in order to break unions and drive down wages, now the Neo-Cons act like this is on Obama.
The Republicans being in the pocket of corporate America did a GREAT job of using ILLEGALS to break unions and drive down wages and along with the wage killing and union killing, they also killed the MIDDLE CLASS.

Suggest removal:

59steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

"Lying is wrong. Stop it."
-
This coming from the same person who said there were war criminals in the Bush administration.

Suggest removal:

60steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

"The Republicans brought the Latinos across the borders for the last 20+ years in order to break unions and drive down wages" No they didn't. Everyone knows the Democrats brought the Latinos in to increase their voter base.

Suggest removal:

61cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

When you lie to congress and the American people for your own reasons for going to war, cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands people and torture people, that pretty much makes you a war criminal. I'd say bush and the rest of his lying administration qualify.

Suggest removal:

62steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

"[Washington Times: “Ben Carson won the Western Conservative Summit’s annual presidential straw poll Sunday, capping a three-day extravaganza billed as the “rally on the right.” Mr. Carson took 22 percent of the vote, followed by Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas with 13 percent and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin with 12 percent."
--
YES, YES, YES

Suggest removal:

63steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

So, lying is OK so long as Cambridge agrees with the lies.

Suggest removal:

64walter_sobchak(1895 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

cambridge,
I didn't think you were part of the "blame America first" crowd. Faulty foreign intelligence does not rise to the level of lying. Britain had the same information we did and went to war. Most Democrat leaders also voted for the war effort. And, stop with the torture angle. We don't torture prisoners. It wasn't true then and its not true now. We used enhanced interrogation techniques to gain valuable information about the enemy.

Suggest removal:

65tnmartin(220 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

BTW, can't tell for sure if Obumble is the worst.
I've always believed that the worst, the VERY worst, was Woodrow Wilson. Followed closely by Franklin D. Roosevelt. After that, it's tougher. Harding was pretty bad. LBJ was ghastly. Jimmy Carter was inept. Clinton may have been the worst person to BE president, which is not quite the same thing.
I do believe Obumble will end up as one of the worst three.

Suggest removal:

66cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

walter....there was no enemy. bush, channey, rumsfeld, rice, powell and the rest claimed they had proof and photos of stock piles of chemical weapons, they claimed they had proof of Iraq having a nuke weapons program and ties to al Qaeda and 9/11 and were an imminent threat to the United States. You can't claim to have proof of all those things while having none of it and not be called a liar. The only reason congress voted for going to war is because they believed the lies they were told.

The result was hundreds of thousands of innocent men, woman and children killed, trillions of US tax dollars wasted and a country left in ruins.

You can call it what you want, I call it lies and torture.

Suggest removal:

67steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Please note that all of these quotes pre-date George Bush's election:
-
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
---
I guess they were all in on it too?

Suggest removal:

68borylie(790 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

steivo, Great job. Copy/paste this in just about every post, since these democrats/liberals want to revise history every day.

Suggest removal:

69steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

I can't wait to hear the spin the left wing loonies put on these quotes. It will look like a weather vane on an old barn in a wind storm.

Suggest removal:

70cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

skeevoeivo....it wasn't any of those people that put us in an illegal war four years later. It was bush the idiot you voted for that did that. No one else, it was him so you should just own it because your BS "spin" doesn't fly.

Suggest removal:

71steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

The goalposts are moving. Here is what you said before the quotes I posted "walter....there was no enemy. bush, channey, rumsfeld, rice, powell and the rest claimed they had proof and photos of stock piles of chemical weapons, they claimed they had proof of Iraq having a nuke weapons program and ties to al Qaeda and 9/11 and were an imminent threat to the United States. You can't claim to have proof of all those things while having none of it and not be called a liar.
--
Then after the quotes you changed to "it wasn't any of those people that put us in an illegal war four years later"
-- If Bush was lying, then all of those folks in the quotes were lying too.

Suggest removal:

72Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Take a victory lap, steivo, you nailed it! The quotes, the authors and their political affiliations, and the dates! But watch, the libs will shift the argument, "Saul Alinsky-style", and resort to ridicule, 'cause they got nothing else. Their man in office has made it abundantly clear that the job is beyond his capabilities, and had it not been for the "complicit" media, covering for his shortcomings and bunglings, in his first term, and now, not so much in his second, he would have been exposed as nothing more than the "community organizer" he was. It's no wonder so many who voted for him, both times are having "buyers remorse".

Suggest removal:

73lajoci(206 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

I was talking about Benghazi.

You baggers lie incessantly about what Obama said about Benghazi.

You baggers lie.

Not anyone else. You baggers.

You have no answer to my assessment of you as liars, so you ignore my condemnation of your repeated lying about what Obama said about Benghazi, and go off on some other tangent.

You're a liar, Steivo.

And so are your little bagger friends.

Suggest removal:

74Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Check the transcript of Husseins interview on "60 Minutes" the day after Benghazi. He freely admits that he avoided using the word "terrorism" to describe the incident. Then he sends Susan Rice out on five, count 'em, five Sunday news shows to spin the lie that the attack was the result of a "spontaneous demonstration", when they knew it was a planned attack by a group of terrorists. Lies upon lies to protect his false claims that he had the terrorists "on the run". That's really a fine example of a "Commander-in-Chief", trying to minimize the deaths of four Americans, one an Ambassador, just to aid his re-election chances.

Suggest removal:

75steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

@Iajoci,
Yeah, and I was talking to Cambridge in #66, but with comments like "The war criminals in the BOOOOsh administration have the blood of 35,000 American casualties on their chicken-hawk fingers", You really shouldn't accuse others of lying.

Suggest removal:

76Askmeificare(700 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

As a young voter paying taxes, I must state that President Jimmy Carter IS the worst US President our country has had.

And any of you would have done the same thing President Bill Clinton did...

Besides, Jim Trafficant was correct when he stated it didn't matter whom you voted for- They ALL were owned by the same people.

Suggest removal:

77lajoci(206 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

"The war criminals in the BOOOOsh administration have the blood of 35,000 American casualties on their chicken-hawk fingers"

Yep. I wrote that. Glad to see you're paying attention.

Exactly what part of that statement do you consider a lie? The total number of casualties? The fact that we were led into these wars of adventures by CHICKEN HAWKS like Boooooosh and Cheeeney and Rummy?

These chicken hawks should be in prison now.

Back to my point, do you deny that on the very next day after the terrorist attack on the American facility in Benghazi the President referred to it as an "act of terror?"

How can you deny that when it is on video, from the Rose Garden, in plain view for all of America to see?

What freaking planet are you baggers from, anyway? What alien life form dropped you off here?

Suggest removal:

78steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

There were no war criminals in the Bush administration. That is a bald faced lie. Do you believe that the lunar landing was staged out in Arizona? What color is the sky in your world?

Suggest removal:

79steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Please note that all of these quotes pre-date George Bush's election:-"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998 "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by:-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999---I guess they were all in on it too? -

Suggest removal:

80Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

At the beginning of Husseins statement, the day after the terrorist attack on our embassy in Libya, he tried to lay blame for the attack as a response to the "anti-islamic video", which proved to be a complete LIE! Only at the end of his speech did he use the general term "acts of terror", which any person of normal and common sensibility would equate to "acts of violence" when used in that context. And then, until he had to "backtrack" his "spontaneous demonstration" LIE, did his administration start to address the matter as "terrorism", however I have yet to hear Hussein actually call it what it was, a TERRORIST ATTACK! And then, to add " insult to injury" he waits over TWO YEARS to capture ONE of the terrorists involved in the attack, who was NOT in hiding! And even worse, when questioned about the delay, and the fact that the "bad guy" was giving "face-to-face" interviews with anyone who asked, Hussein had the audacity to explain that "journalists had better resources" than our Military or Law Enforcement, to find and meet with terrorists! What a slap in the face of our HEROS in the Military and L.E.! Lies compounding other lies in this instance, not to mention the I.R.S. scandal, V.A. scandal, border crisis, "Fast & Furious" scandal, " you can keep your Doc & insurance lie", etc. and what have we learned from him about all of this? He likes to shoot pool and have a few beers!

Suggest removal:

81walter_sobchak(1895 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Chessie,
You are on target about BHO. He spoke for five minutes in the Rose Garden about Benghazi and didn't use the word "terror" until the last 30 seconds.He mentioned the attack there four times and never once modified the "attack" with the adjective "terror" but used a generic expression about any act of terror. His exact words:

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."

How about that last punchline about "justice"? Can't get re-elected as the President that prevented terrorism when you have another terrorist attack on Sept 11 on all days. Totally disingenuous, like his entire presidency. But, before you can alter the course of America, you must first destroy America.

Suggest removal:

82Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Wow! Here's another"prime" example of Husseins incompetence, just coming to light a few moments ago. After Hussein has to appoint a new head of the I.R.S. due to it's targeting of the Tea Party and other conservative groups, and it's former leaders running like rats from a sinking ship, and pleading the "fifth" to avoid telling the truth, it has now been revealed that the alleged "missing e-mails" are suddenly found! And when asked by Congress why he didn't know this, the new I.R.S. Chief says he was told that he was informed that there was a "discrepancy" with Lerners e-mails but no explanation of the "discrepancy" was given to him, at the time. And, supposedly being the guy to fix the I.R.S.'s issues, he doesn't ASK for an explanation, and decides to just testify before Congress that he "doesn't know about the e-mails". Okay, I was born at night, but it wasn't LAST NIGHT....and as dumb as I can be at times, and knowing the HUGE implication of the whole I.R.S. scandal, I'm pretty sure I would have at least asked "what KIND of discrepancies" exist with Lerners e-mails. But nooooo.......Husseins "I.R.S. savior" just bumps along, feigning ignorance, much like Hussein does when these scandals erupt. Hmmm....am I seeing a "theme" here? Husseins a Democrat, Koskinen's a HUGE donor to the Democrats, Cummings ( a Democratic member of the panel investigating the I.R.S. scandal) declaring the investigation a "sham". C'mon, am I the only one putting "2 & 2" together?

Suggest removal:

83steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

The national debt that the Liar inherited from George Bush was $10.6 trillion. Today it stands at $17.6 trillion. To the left wing loonies, somehow this is a cut. By the time he leaves office the Liar will have increased the debt more than all the other Presidents in US history combined and ruined the country for generations to come.

Suggest removal:

84cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Skeevoeivo.....again you fail to factor in the interest the Obama administration has to pay on the debt bush ran up. Here is how much the national debt has go up during recent administrations.

reagan up 190 percent

ghw bush up 52 percent

Clinton up 37 percent

gw bush up 86 percent

Obama up 45 percent

You can read all about it in the link below. You're welcome. Oh, and have someone explain how interest works for you.

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/02/duel...

Suggest removal:

85steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Spin spin spin. All Presidents had to deal with interest on the national debt. The Liar will increase the national debt by more than all the other Presidents in our history combined by the end of his term.

Suggest removal:

86walter_sobchak(1895 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

cambridge,
Those are old numbers. When BHO took office, the national debt was 10.627T. As of today, the national debt stands at 17.599T, which is an increase of 6.972T or 65.6%. The percentage is lower since he started at a higher debt. But, the real problem is that the current debt is about 74% of GDP. Now, to keep that 74% of GDP constant over the next 25 years, taxes will need to go up 6.5% each year, unless spending is cut. These are numbers put out by the CBO. Since job creation has been dismal the last 6 years, it is not encouraging. Now, if you don't like it, you can pass the blunt to the homie on your left.

Suggest removal:

87cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Those numbers tell me that your boy ronnie put this country on a path of destruction. When Clinton came along he was handed ronnie's and bush the fathers debt and budget deficit and he turned it into a budget surplus. Clinton handed that budget surplus and the path for paying off the debt to bush the idiot son and we all know what he did with that.

You claim job creation has been dismal the last six years. When Obama took office we were losing 750,000 jobs a month. If we are now creating 150,000 jobs a month which is a conservative number that is a 900,000 job swing to the good. There have been more jobs created during the Obama administration than bush the father and bush the idiot son combined. Your problem is you're letting the facts confuse you. The numbers are right in front of you but you just ignore them and keep praying to saint ronnie.

Suggest removal:

88steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Here is the Liar's record:
--
The percentage of the population receiving food stamps is at an all time high.
The percentage of people on welfare is at an all time high.
The percentage of people on disability is at an all time high.
The percentage of people working is at an all time low.
The national debt is at 17.5 million.
Illegal immigrants are flooding across the border.
Nearly 50% of the population pays no income taxes at all.
---
We have sure come along way down since the glory days of Reagan.

Suggest removal:

89IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Stevie needs a tissue

Suggest removal:

9076Ytown(1233 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Food for thought.

http://www.usdebtclock.org/index.html

Suggest removal:

91lajoci(206 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Republicans squander the Clinton surplus fighting 2 fictitious wars and crashing the economy (scooping out the till to save their rich cronies on the way out the door), and then proceed to blame Obama for the mess.

Go back to right-wingnut cloud-coo-coo land, baggers!

Suggest removal:

92steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

With all the "squandering" the Republicans did, the Liar will increase the national debt by more than all other Presidents in US history combined.

Suggest removal:

93cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

skeevoeivo....we are still paying the interest on the interest on the interest from when your boy reagan increased the national debt by 190 percent. The federal government doesn't have the revenue coming in to cover the debt Obama inherited. Are you so stupid that you don't understand that or is it just easier to ignore that fact in that fantasy land between your ears?

Suggest removal:

94steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Dumbridge,
Let me try to get it through your thick skull. All Presidents have inherited debt when they entered office, but the Liar will increase the national debt while he is office more than all the other Presidents in history combined.

Suggest removal:

95IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

The debt is not nearly increasing at the rate it was when you deduct the interest that is accumulating from previous administrations. ObamaCare is projected to reduce the debt by approximately $800 Billion in its first ten years. Taking troops out of Afghanistan and getting out of Iraq have helped by the tune of a TRILLION DOLLARS a year.

Unemployment is DOWN. (The economy is on its best rate for job creation since 1999)
The stock Market is UP at record levels
GM is ALIVE
Bin Laden is DEAD

Obama RULES!!!!

Suggest removal:

96Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

You got that right! He does "RULE"', just like the tyrannical dictator he aspires to be! Stepping all over our Constitutional rights, ignoring and selectively choosing which laws he will enforce and changing the ones that might hurt his "friends" (read that "voter base"), targeting his detractors by using one of the most feared Federal agencies and then covering up the fact, when exposed....yeah he "RULES" for sure!

Suggest removal:

97steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

"ObamaCare is projected to reduce the debt by approximately $800 Billion in its first ten years."
--
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Suggest removal:

98cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Mike....save your breath, skeevoeivo is too lame to understand basic math.

It would be like if you had a credit card and you put 190 percent more spending on the credit card than you earned. When the bill comes you don't pay it and that 190 percent starts collecting interest. Next month when the bill comes you don't pay it again and continue this course for the next eight years. Now the interest is collecting interest.

You don't pay it for four years and then add another 52 percent to the debt all the while interest on interest is adding up by the minute.

After four years you try another approach for the next eight years. By the end of that eight years you are actually paying down your debt but by now the debt and the interest is so high your debt still increases another 37 percent but at least your on the right track.

Now you change strategies and again spend more than you make and along with the interest you raised that credit card debt another 86 percent.

Now you cut your deficit spending in half but after thirty years your dealing with a runaway train. To blame your recent history and ignore the last thirty years that got you where you're at is stupid to say the least.

Anyone with even limited intelligence and a primary grasp on math would understand this and there in lies skeevoeivo's problem.

Suggest removal:

99steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

No, a better analogy would be if my credit card bill came due and I decided not to pay it because the bills were for things my wife charged (previous Presidents). Then to get her back, I would go out and charge 10 times as much as she charged and then blame her for everything. I would charge things that I didn't even need and give away money to everyone who asked me for some.

Suggest removal:

100iBuck(214 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Ah, a fun, genteel discussion, for a change.

Let's see, WHTaft... Teddy Bozovelt... Wilson... Hubert Hoover... FDR... Truman... Eisenhower... JFK...(shortened for space limits)

LBJ: Medicare, Medicaid, the evil society undermined families, undermined coinage with coppernickel Johnson Slugs, and set back race relations.

Nixon: appeased Red China, undermined coinage and currency, idiotic price controls.

Ford was no paragon, though I don't recall the specifics just now.

Carter: totally fumbled the economy and foreign relations, continued inflation, and set the first trigger for the destruction of the S&Ls.

Reagan: signed the second triggler for the destruction of the S&Ls, failed to eliminate Dept. of Educationism and Dept. of Energy; wimped out on taming Medicare, Medicaid and the Socialist Insecurity Abomination; 1986 amnesty for illegal aliens, rule 1706, and accompanying measures to reduce US citizens' privacy and liberty.

GHWBush: read my lips extortion increase, "assault" rifle import ban, Ruby Ridge.

Clintoon: Mt. Carmel/Waco massacre, ClintonDoesn'tCare, sexual assaults, vastly increased guest-worker visas 10 months after stock market crash and during tech wash-out and Y2K bust as job markets were worsening, several amnesties for illegal aliens.

Shrub: fumbled detecton of terrorists, unpatriotic act, pushed for even more guest-work visas while job markets were still in the dumps (but only got a couple smaller, more under the table increases).

cousin OhhBummer!: Fast and Furious, ObummerDoesn'tCare with its assaults on everyone's privacy, Benghazi, abuses by IRS and obstruction of justice, NSA egregious snooping on US citizens (they're supposed to spy on foreign governments and operatives), never accessible to the public when he should be and always appearing for photo ops and golfing and fund-raisers when more important issues need immediate attention, the Gates fiasco and other race obsessions including refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers, other attempts at election fraud and obstruction, trade of deserter for 5 terrorist chieftains (might be 1 excuse for that), Keystone XL, war against coal, CO2 hysteria, opposition to free and honest markets within the USA, aid to Hamas and Syrian terrorists, opposition to cutting unconstitutional spending and balancing federal government, shutting down parks in an old old gambit which back-fired amongst everyone but the leftist media, opposition to immigration reform and support of immigration law perversion, belligerent refusal to faithfully carry out the current constitutional immigration laws, continuing efforts to worsen US job markets through taxes and regulations, crippling of US military, appeasement of Putin and Red China and North Korea and Iran, crony socialism run rampant...

Yes, we've had a lot of low-quality presidents (even GWashington made a mistake with the whiskey tax, a mistake which he later repented), but cousin Obummer is the worst.

Suggest removal:

101steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

As you point out, all POTUS have some weaknesses, but my evaluation of the top 3 in US History are:
-
1) Ronald Reagan
2) Abraham Lincoln
3) George Washington
-
The worst 3 are:
1) Barack Obama by a wide margin
2) Theodore Roosevelt
3) Jimmy Carter

Suggest removal:

102IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Reagan is a Felon, (see:Iran - Contra) who saw unemployment rise from 7% to 11% during his time in the White House. Crime in the U.S. was at an all time high, he wasted BILLIONS of tax dollars on his famed "War on Drugs." He Increased the defense budget every year for an unprecedented 6 straight years and it lead to a defense bubble.
Oh yeah, Ronny increased the deficit from 994 Billion in '81 when he took office to 2.9 TRILLION WHEN HE LEFT IN '89. Yep, he TRIPLED the deficit while at the same time magically increasing taxes throughout his presidency.
He was referred to as, "The Great Communicator" yet his own kids did not speak to him.

Suggest removal:

103Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

President Reagan ends the "Cold War", and Hussein starts another one by "leading from behind" and portraying weakness from the start of his first term, 'til now. Putin doesn't fear him, and and ISIS and Hamas are his "buds", so it's no wonder there is turmoil across the globe. And now, his latest "gift" to the muslims was to urge the Dems to attach the money we were going give to Israel for their "Iron Dome" technology, to a ridiculous "immigration bill" that the Repubs are going to shoot down, so that it appears that they don't want to support Israel. When the Dems were asked about it, they said it was at the urging of "the White House". Way to go, Hussein, why not just "turn out the lights" and let the muslims have the keys to our "front door".

Suggest removal:

104IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Unemployment is DOWN
The stock market is UP

GM is ALIVE
Bin Laden is DEAD

Obama elected by majority vote TWICE!!!!
The people have SPOKEN!!!

HILLARY 2016!!!

Suggest removal:

105steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

The percentage of the population receiving food stamps is at an all time high.
The percentage of people on welfare is at an all time high.
The percentage of people on disability is at an all time high.
The percentage of people working is at an all time low.
The national debt is at 17.5 million.
Illegal immigrants are flooding across the border.
Nearly 50% of the population pays no income taxes at all.

Suggest removal:

106Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Now we are forced to abandon our Embassy in Tripoli, Libya. Yeah, Husseins really got the terrorists " on the run"! Boy, what "tranquil" times we are living in! His foreign policy is a DISASTER, his signature legislation, HusseinCare is dying a "slow death", so much so, he has to keep granting exemptions from it, Hamas keeps "thumbing their noses" at his boy Kerry, the I.R.S. can't find e-mails, or lost e-mails, or maybe destroyed e-mails, oh wait a minute, maybe we have the e-mails (and this agency handles our personal info, and is going to administer parts of HusseinCare), IslandMike, you are right; C'MON 2016!

Suggest removal:

107IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Obama is Commander-In-Chief
The Leader of the Free World and there is NOTHING you can do about it!!!

Elected by MAJORITY vote TWICE!!!!!

The people have SPOKEN!!!

Suggest removal:

108IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Do you people think the economy is better now than it was when Obama entered office?
Unemployment is down and the stock market is up at record high levels!! His critics that whined about the stimulus being a failure are now nowhere to be heard!!

Is America a safer place?
There have been no terrorist attacks on U.S. Soil like we had on 9/11!!!

Foreign policy?
Bin Laden is DEAD, the U.S. is OUT of Iraq!!!

The REAL underlying issue that relates to this CONSTANT micro-analysis of Obama and the CONSTANT criticism of him is RACISM, BIGOTRY, HATRED and IGNORANCE.

Suggest removal:

109Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

With our border basically a "sieve", you are living in a fantasy world if you believe that only "innocent little children" are coming across! And I'm not talking about the "gang members" either! So, no America is not a safer place. And did we forget about the Boston bombings? Or how about the attempted Times Square bombing? I'm almost positive both of those places are on "U.S. soil". Furthermore, my dislike is not based on "racism" or "bigotry", 'cause I don't like the "white half" of him either. Actually, after seeing him on a few of the "late night" shows, I do think he'd make a pretty good entertainer, and I'd probably watch his shows, if he kept his politics out of it. Now that I think about it, as President Reagan was a lousy actor, who became an amazing President, the opposite could be said for Hussein!

Suggest removal:

110steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Do you people think the economy is better now than it was when Obama entered office?
No. The % of people working is at a record low and the % of people on welfare and receiving food stamps is at an all time high.

Is America a safer place? No, we have had numerous terrorist attacks on our soil, but our President is such a Liar that he won't call them that.

My dream Republican ticket is Dr. Ben Carson and Condoleeza Rice.

Suggest removal:

111cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Your amazing president reagan along with his illegal arms deal Iran/Contra supplied arms and bankrolled Osama bin Ladean and al qeada who along with Hamas blew up our Marine barracks in Beirut that killed hundreds of Marines.

As far as illegals, reagan gave amnesty to 1.7 million of them.

Suggest removal:

112IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

Keep dreaming Stevio!!
You should go into comedy, that's HILLARIOUS!!
Uncle Tom Carson and The Shoe Shopper!!!

Suggest removal:

113steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

The REAL underlying issue that relates to this CONSTANT micro-analysis of <Carson> and the CONSTANT criticism of him is RACISM, BIGOTRY, HATRED and IGNORANCE. -

Suggest removal:

114IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month, 1 week ago

True. I find him to be all of those!!

Suggest removal:

115Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month ago

Hmmmm.....who would I rather have as a leader of the "free world".....COLONEL Allen West, DOCTOR Ben Carson, or LAWYER Hussein Obama?

Suggest removal:

116cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month ago

The voters of The United States of America overwhelmingly voted for Barrack Hussein Obama.

You lost big time both times. Get over it!

Suggest removal:

117borylie(790 comments)posted 1 month ago

Cambridge. Unfortunately we all lost. It will just take a little longer for some to realize this. I'm over it because what doesn't kill us, makes us stronger. It will take some time, but we shall overcome.

Suggest removal:

118steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

Just 907 more days of this Liar.

Suggest removal:

119IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month ago

Whining is for LOSERS!!

Suggest removal:

120Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month ago

We'll, Husseins boy Kerry just got back from Israel, thankfully with nothing to show for the trip. He tried his darnedest to get Israel to subjugate to Hamas, even trying to bring in the muslim leadership of Turkey and Qatar (Qatar, you know, the place where Hussein sent the "Taliban Dream Team" for "R&R", after trading them for a possible deserter, who, by the way, has conveniently disappeared from the front pages) and Turkey's leader being a member of the muslim brotherhood. Now there's a group you want trying to negotiate for one our allies, Israel. Hussein is so concerned for the casualties in Gaza, well here's novel idea....TELL 'EM TO STOP FIRING MISSLES INTO ISRAEL!!! But no...Hussein just wrings his hands for the poor "Gaza-ites", who for the last so many years have allowed a terrorist organization like Hamas free rein over their territory, letting them hide their weapon caches in schools, hospitals and parks. Kinda makes you wonder where his loyalty rests, no?

Suggest removal:

121steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

Now the Liar has sent a letter to Putin. Putin will tell the Liar what he can do with his pen and his phone.

Suggest removal:

122IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month ago

Putin hasn't done a thing to the U.S. He has however invaded Ukraine / Crimea. Who are we to tell Putin he has no right to do so when the U.S. under George Bush invaded Iraq?

Quit whining, your candidates were all LOSERS, get over it!!

Suggest removal:

123cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month ago

Mike....you don't get it. These two clowns think The United States should be the worlds police force. They think we should be imposing our military in every conflict in the world. Typical teabagger/republicans, never saw a war they didn't like.

Suggest removal:

124Askmeificare(700 comments)posted 1 month ago

god is dead. jeezus was crucified so the american people wouldn't be.

Give Obama a 3rd and 4th term.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfgOd...

Suggest removal:

125steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

906

Suggest removal:

126walter_sobchak(1895 comments)posted 1 month ago

IslandMike
You obviously do not know what you are talking about. In 1994, the Clinton Administration gave diplomatic assurances to the Ukraine that we would insure their borders would be secure in exchange for them giving up their nuclear weapons and drastically reducing the size of their army. Boris Yeltsin signed the agreement on behalf of the Russian Federation. Don't forget, in 2005, soon after Barry became a US Senator he and Dick Lugar traveled to Eastern Ukraine and then went to Kiev where they met with the Russians to further expand the nuclear dis-arming to include even more conventional weapons. So, the US took the bite out of the defenses of the Ukraine in exchange for guaranteeing the security of their border. Typical of the community organizer, he has once again not lived up to his promise!

Suggest removal:

127cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month ago

walt....I have an idea, you and skeevoeivo and the rest of your tuff guy friends that are in such a rush to get into another war. Buy yourselves a plane ticket to the Ukraine, Israel, Iraq or any other place you want to send American troops and treasure pick a side and tell them you're here to help them in their fight. No one will stop you, just go over there and go to war.

You think it's such a good idea for the US to get involved in these people killing each other because it's a noble cause to come to the aid of who you think is right in other peoples madness. The funny thing is that if those same people you want others to fight for sent their six year old little girl to cross our boarder to escape the violence people like you and skeevoeivo would be the first to point a gun at her.

Suggest removal:

128walter_sobchak(1895 comments)posted 1 month ago

cambridge,
I didn't say I wanted to get into another war but are we not supposed to live up to our promises? There are other methods than war but it takes leadership and planning. Remember, as a member of NATO, any attack on a member country is viewed as an attack on the USA. Unfortunately, Barry is a sorry excuse for a leader and the only planning he does is whether to use a fairway wood or lay up with an iron.

Suggest removal:

129cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month ago

walt....no I don't think we are obliged to live up to anything said twenty years ago. Nothing going on in these conflicts in other parts of the world is any of our business. I don't care about any of those people on either side of any of it. I'm not interested in investing American blood, money or a minute of our time on any of them.

Suggest removal:

130steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

Walt,
It is hopeless. Dumbridge doesn't care what happens in the Ukraine or anywhere else for that matter. 4 Americans dead in Benghazi - What difference does it make. Ft. Hood??? Workplace violence. Boston Marathon bombing??? Don't worry about that. Illegal immigrants streaming across the border? Don't waste any money on that either. These left wing loonies only want to spend taxpayers money on any handout and freebie they can dream up. If they are so intent on giving money away, I suggest they go to their own bank account and make a withdrawal. Then they can give away all they want.

Suggest removal:

131IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month ago

Too bad McCain didn't win, we'd have troops in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea and God knows where else.
Obama is doing the right thing by trying to handle the situation diplomatically WITHOUT U.S. troop intervention.
Everyone seems to comment on the mistakes he's making, yet I never hear them mention any ideas of their own.

Suggest removal:

132steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

"Too bad McCain didn't win, we'd have troops in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea and God knows where else."
--
No we wouldn't but we would have a lot less debt right now.

Suggest removal:

133cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month ago

mccain voted for every economic policy the bush administration had and we all know how those policies turned out. Here is mccain in his own words from his own mouth talking about the economy and his expertise.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=C4egXbh...

Suggest removal:

134steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

Bush's policies turned out with about $7 trillion less debt right now.

Suggest removal:

135IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month ago

McCain and all Republicons are sore LOSERS!
The U.S. is out of Iraq
There have been no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil under Obama.
GM is alive and all the right wingers who bashed Obama's economic stimulus plan are nowhere to be found.
The U.S. Economy is thriving, unemployment is down, fewer people are on welfare and food stamps, and the stock market is at record high levels.
Bin Laden is dead

Suggest removal:

136steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

905

Suggest removal:

137Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month ago

How about the responses to Husseins latest "impressive" foray into foreign policy and diplomacy? He urges Israel to "ceasefire" and they step up their operations (rightfully so) to eradicate the terrorist organization, Hamas. Then he basically tells Putin that he's going to "hold his breath and stomp his feet" until Russia stops sending troops and artillery to the Ukraine, and his response? More troops and artillery sent to the border of Ukraine. And Iraq and Afghanistan are pretty much under control of the muslim terrorists that Hussein bragged that he had "decimated" and had on the "run". The "bad guys" on the worlds stage have taken note of how weak Hussein has made us, and they are taking full advantage of that fact. If this doesn't get turned around, we're all going to be wearing towels or pancakes on our heads, and looking for the moon, to start our religious holidays!

Suggest removal:

138Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month ago

You can't make this stuff up!!!!...With all of the domestic and world strife, at large, what's Hussein concerned with?....THERE'S NO WOMEN ON THE PAPER U.S. CURRENCY!!! Unbelievable!!! We're on the brink of another Cold War with Russia, and maybe another World War in the Middle East, and he can't stop campaigning, with this latest stunt obviously targeting the "female voter". We no longer have a leader (of course we should be used to it, since we really haven't had one since he took office), but we have a "campaigner/golfer/pool shooter/beer drinker-in-charge"! When our adversaries see stuff like this, it's no wonder they no longer consider our response when they flex their muscles.

Suggest removal:

139steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

All of our problems would be solved if we just had a woman on our paper currency. Coin currency just won't do.

Suggest removal:

140Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month ago

Quotes from Husseins books:

From: Dreams From My Father

"I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."

From: Dreams From My Father

"I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race."

From: Dreams From My Father

"There was something about her that made me wary, a little too sure of herself, maybe and white."

From: Dreams From My Father

"It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names."

From: Dreams From My Father

"I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself: the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela."

And FINALLY ... and most scary:

From: Audacity of Hope

"I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."

So who's the racist, bigot and muslim sympathizer?

Suggest removal:

141cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month ago

chessiedad....you're a liar posting lies from teabagger/republican emails. The proof of your lies are in the links below. These teabagger/republican emails have been going around since his landslide victories in his presidential elections and have been debunked over and over again.

The elections are over and you lost big time both times. Get over it.

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/06/obam...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-met...

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/...

Suggest removal:

142Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month ago

Yeah, Like I'm going to rely on the "left-leaning" sites like those, who habitually try and provide cover for Hussein! His words, not mine, and you can put whatever "spin" you want on them (the last time I checked, most "arabs" are muslims). Under Hussein we have lost the respect of not only our adversaries, but most of our allies, and so he got what he wanted; he's "fundamentally transformed" this once great Nation, into a "limp-wristed" shell of it's once mighty power. Like his wife, Michelle said, after his first election, that "for the first time in her life, she was proud to be an American", well for the first time for millions of Americans I know, they are no longer so "proud to be an American".

Suggest removal:

143steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

Great post Chessie. His left wing looney sites just put spin on the facts that you posted. And when he was elected, I am one of those who for the first time are no longer proud to be an American. I used to have a flag hanging at my house. I took in down in 2008 and have never flew it again.

Suggest removal:

144cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 month ago

chessiedad....you're a liar and a loser and those links prove it. Those sites are not connected to any political party, they provide proof and backup for what they say. Unlike you who just recycles the emails you and your teabagger buddies keep passing around. Everything you post was proved a lie six years ago but the pathetic fool that you are you keep trying to pass it off as fact. I have no doubt that you have every teabagger email you ever got or sent and all you do is post the same lies over and over and when you do I'll post proof you lied.

You have no credibility because you are a pathetic little cry baby liar that can't accept the fact that Barack Hussein Obama is The President of the United States of America. It's only fitting that you, your teabagger buddies and skeevoeivo aren't proud to be Americans because America sure isn't proud of you. Fools like you two are the reason Obama got elected because real Americans would never want to vote the same way you did and that's why he won twice by landslides.

You lost big time both times, get over it.

Suggest removal:

145steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

@Chessie,
There is your response:
--
You teabagger lost teabagger big teabagger time teabagger both teabagger times teabagger, get teabagger over teabagger it teabagger.

Suggest removal:

146Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month ago

@steivo,
Yeah, the typical Saul Alinsky response...remember his rule #4: "ridicule is man's most potent weapon". I don't have any animosity against the "libs", I just disagree with their politics, yet, again in typical "Alinsky" fashion, they have to attack those of us who don't fall in "lock-step" with their views. Hmmm....what other ideologies have that kind of "you are with us, or must be destroyed" mentality? Watch the attacks, now!

Suggest removal:

147steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

"ObamaCare is now the most unpopular since being signed into law in 2010. According to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll, 53 percent of Americans have an unfavorable view of President Obama’s signature health care law, an 8 point jump since June."
--
If this thing is as great as the left wing loonies say it is, why do the unfavorable ratings keep increasing. I guess its those teabaggers and Fox News.

Suggest removal:

148steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

Now the Liar is on another apology tour.

Suggest removal:

149steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

903

Suggest removal:

150IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 month ago

903 days of crying left for all sore LOSERS!!

Suggest removal:

151steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

"Carson takes major steps toward a 2016 White House bid"

Suggest removal:

152Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 month ago

Gee...an incredibly intelligent, Yale grad, recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, NEUROSURGEON, who happens to be African-American AND a conservative vs. a proven "ultra-liberal", Saul Alinsky-mentored, willing to lie to the American people, child rapist-defending LAWYER. It's going to be interesting to see what the "racial pride" voters are going to do in this situation! C'mon General Powell, how are you gonna 'splain your support in this hypothetical runoff?

Suggest removal:

153steivo(462 comments)posted 1 month ago

I wonder if the racists will oppose Ben Carson?

Suggest removal:

154steivo(462 comments)posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago

Oprah, what about some support here?

Suggest removal:

155Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago

Miss Oprah ain't got the "juice" she used to have with the White House 'cause Misus Hussein ain't diggin' the fact that Miss Oprah got more "steam" with her fans than she do! Sorry for the "Ebonics", but I can't help myself when anyone brings up the "rift" between these folks. What a bunch of narcissistic elitists!

Suggest removal:

156steivo(462 comments)posted 4 weeks ago

900

Suggest removal:

157steivo(462 comments)posted 3 weeks, 5 days ago

898

Suggest removal:

158Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 3 weeks, 5 days ago

Love the "countdown", but at the same time it makes it blatantly obvious that there is a lot of time left for Hussein to irreparably do further damage to this Country. And with his "pen" and "phone" you know he will. And as the muslims drive the Christians out of Iraq, and murder one our top-ranking Generals in Afghanistan, claim that they will continue to attack Israel, and Putin "thumbs his nose" at us....what's Hussein up to? Having dinner at a "posh" D.C. restaurant to plan his upcoming Martha's Vineyard, tax payer-funded vacation.

Suggest removal:

159walter_sobchak(1895 comments)posted 3 weeks, 5 days ago

CHessie,
Amen to the pen and phone comments with respect to Barack Hussein Obama's disregard for laws. But, did you see what the Russians thinks about BHO's birthday?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...

Suggest removal:

160steivo(462 comments)posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago

Well, I see where the Liar is about to strike Iraq today. He will have to bomb all of the Humvees, tanks, and military equipment of ours that he left behind when he cut and run. Now he will have to waste billions of dollars to blow up our own military equipment. Not only is he the worst POTUS since WWII he is the dumbest POTUS in history.
I wonder if this will make him a war criminal and I wonder if the Haliburton contract kickbacks will now go to Joe Biden?

Suggest removal:

161Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago

Too little, too late, and at this point mostly just "dog and pony show" theatrics. With our air superiority, we could have stomped IS back to the Middle Ages when they were gaining momentum in Syria, but instead, Hussein draws his now "infamous" Red Line, which ends up being a "Pink Line". We have the air power to obliterate all of these muslim terrorist organizations, including Hamas, without putting any more "boots on the ground" other than a few "spotters" to designate targets, we just don't have leadership that has the fortitude to do it. The islamists have no interest in peace or truces, they just want to convert the entire world to islam, or destroy any other religions, a crusade that has spanned the Ages, and until we realize that and are prepared to act accordingly, it won't be long before the "black flags" will be flying on American soil.

Suggest removal:

162steivo(462 comments)posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

What a bunch of doubletalk. The Liar is telling us how he cut and run in Iraq and it turned into a disaster and now he is telling us how he is going to cut and run in Afghanistan and it is going to turn out good. This man has turned lying into an artform.

Suggest removal:

163lajoci(206 comments)posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

An art form?

You would know. You've made lying your full-time occupation.

I mean, FOOL-time!

Suggest removal:

164steivo(462 comments)posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

Your insults are more a reflection on you than they are on me.

Suggest removal:

165Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

Hussein has told so many "lies", even he can't remember all of them. He now claims that he pulled our troops out of Iraq because "Iraq didn't want them there", yet he forgets that he campaigned on "ending the war in Iraq" and bringing our troops home! Unbelievable!! And he even has the audacity to state that "we need to create a stable government in Iraq". Ummm...didn't they have that, until we pulled out? This guy is so far "in over his head" when it comes to governing, that it's no surprise our adversaries are running amok, all over the world!

Suggest removal:

166lajoci(206 comments)posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

Calling you out for the liar you are is an insult?

HA!

It is simply truth-telling in its purest form!

I don't mean to insult YOU any more than you mean to insult the President!

I am simply labeling you the fraud that you are!

You are a liar and a fraud and a scoundrel! None of these pronouncements are meant to be insults, but, rather, statements of fact, declarations of truth, akin to stating the time of day, or the Dow-Jones market index, or the price of tea in China.

Liar, fraud, and scoundrel. Yes, the fact that I use these terms to reference you does say something about my clarity of thinking, my depth of insight, and my capacity for candid assessment of the evil in people around me.

Liars, frauds, and scoundrels like you are evil, and your kind need to be called out whenever the likes of you spew your vitriol in the public forum.

So there you are, you evil, lying, fraudulent scoundrel.

Suggest removal:

167steivo(462 comments)posted 3 weeks, 3 days ago

OK, I understand. I don't men this as an insult and it is nothing personal, but you are a stupid idiotic nitwit. Like I say, it is not meant to be an insult, but rather just a statement of fact.

Suggest removal:

168lajoci(206 comments)posted 3 weeks, 1 day ago

I may be, in fact, a stupid, idiotic nitwit.

But I destroy your arguments on a regular basis.

So what does that make you? Huh? What?

Besides a liar, I mean.

And a copy-cat, to boot, without even a semblance of an original thought.

Suggest removal:

169steivo(462 comments)posted 3 weeks, 1 day ago

"But I destroy your arguments on a regular basis." Only in your vivid imagination.

Suggest removal:

170steivo(462 comments)posted 3 weeks ago

The Liar just sent more troops (he called them advisors) to Iraq. When Bush did it, the left wing loonies went crazy, now they are silent.

Suggest removal:

171Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago

Wow!!!....This latest "lie" by Hussein surpasses all of his other ones, including the "you can keep your doctor and insurance" one!!! While campaigning he (and there is no way to "spin" this in his favor) bragged about "ending the war in Iraq and bringing our troops home", and now that it's obvious that was a major failure of his, he's trying to lay the blame on the Iraqis that they "didn't want us there"! This guy is not only a liar, but he is "pathological" about it! He pulls our Military out, against the recommendations of his top Military advisors, and is now expecting them to "fix" the situation with a few airstrikes and a couple of hundred "advisors" on the ground. He has no knowledge of "war strategies", let alone never having served in uniform, yet he thinks he knows better than his Military Commanders....a clear case of "Commander-in-Chief" narcissism!

Suggest removal:

172cambridge(2997 comments)posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago

bush made a binding agreement with the Iraq government to pull American troops out. The Iraq government requested that Obama pull our troops out by the date of the agreement and he did.

These people are following their thousands of years of tradition of killing each other over religion. Let them, it's none of our business. The only reason we are getting involved in the Kurdish region is because of chevron's oil interest there. We fight wars where the oil companies tell us.

Suggest removal:

173steivo(462 comments)posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago

So, is Obama committing war crimes by sending troops to Irag to protect Chevron's oil interests?

Suggest removal:

174cambridge(2997 comments)posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago

Yes!

Suggest removal:

175Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago

Here we go with the "blame Bush" game again! Funny I never heard Hussein give credit to President Bush when he was going around the Country campaigning and taking credit for "ending the war in Iraq"! But now, since that has blown up in his face, and he's scrambling for an excuse, oh, wait a minute, Bush was responsible! Apparently Hussein's never heard of video recordings, or thinks that we are so stupid that we won't remember these things! With all of the scandals his administration is involved in and foreign diplomacy failures he's suffered, his legacy as leader of this Country will be one of shame and dishonesty.

Suggest removal:

176steivo(462 comments)posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago

The Liar sent in troops to save the Iraqi people from ISIS and Bush sent troops into Iraq to save the Iraqi people from Sadaam Hussein. No difference at all.

Suggest removal:

177Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago

Hussein is staying "true to form", once again, by being critical of our "men and women in blue", without having all of the facts. You would think that someone who is allegedly an "astute Constitutional legal mind" would be cognizant of the "due process" procedures that must take place when an incident such as that which had occurred in Missouri. But no, once again he has to " jump the gun" (no pun intended) and get his "mug" in front of a camera to criticize and demonize our Heroes in Blue. Way to go, National F.O.P., supporting Hussein while he continually slaps both our Law Enforcement community and our Military in the face. I hope the F.O.P. has learned that votes have consequences.

Suggest removal:

178steivo(462 comments)posted 2 weeks, 4 days ago

Polarizing of the races and the society in general are the direct result of this Liar's actions. He has ruined the country and the next POTUS will have a complete mess to clean up.

Suggest removal:

179Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 2 weeks, 4 days ago

Talk about a "double standard" when it comes to "racism" in America. The African-American community in Ferguson, MO goes nuts and riots against their Police Department, that just happens to have a Caucasian Police Chief, but completely calms down when the State Police, who just so happens to have an African-American Commander, takes over the scene. Yet when someone disagrees with Hussein about his ideologies and political messages, and they just so happen to be Caucasian, well, they're just "racists"! Please explain to me how the prior is not "racist" and the latter is.

Suggest removal:

180Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 2 weeks, 4 days ago

This incident in Missouri is now starting to have National implications. Some politicians, both Republican and Democrat, now want to disarm our Nations Police. They are contemplating ending a program that allowed Law Enforcement agencies to acquire surplus equipment from the Military. So, when your local Police Department needs more equipment, be it a "bullet resistant vehicle" or fax machine or copier, well I just guess us citizens will have to be taxed even more to pay for this stuff rather than to get it for free from the Feds. Just so we don't upset the citizenry with that "scary stuff"! I don't know about you, but if I ever need my local Police to help me in a life- threatening situation, I want them coming to my aid as quickly as possible, with the best equipment possible, and even better if they got that equipment for free, and I didn't have to pay for it (even though in all reality, I have payed for it through my Federal income taxes). Now that I think about it, it's starting to become apparent that the folks who are against "free stuff" for our cops, are more than likely not paying any taxes, anyway. So why should they care that us "workers", who have jobs, and can't take time off to riot and loot, will have to pay for the "stuff" we were getting for free! Unbelievable! I have an idea...before these politicians stop this program, they need to take away all of the equipment, guns and armored vehicles included, that protect them in Washington! If they are willing to do that, then go for it, stop the program.

Suggest removal:

181steivo(462 comments)posted 2 weeks, 4 days ago

Me too. If someone is burglarizing my house and I call the police, I want them to show up with a SWAT TEAM fully armed with automatic weapons and armored vehicles. It seems the ones opposed to this are the ones committing the crimes.

Suggest removal:

182Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago

Anyone notice how the Vindy has been conspicuously absent of any articles concerning the "race riots" in Missouri? Here we are, on the verge of what could turn out to be riots in our cities across the Nation, the likes of which have not been seen since the Sixties, and yet not a word or a sentence, is being reported by the Vindy? Things that "make you go ...hmmm"! Either way, the situation appears to be out of control, there, and it's not getting any better, even after the supposed "savior" from the Missouri Highway Patrol took over command of the situation. The rioters have attacked the store where the robbery suspect who was killed had robbed, destroying it in an attempt to find and kill it's owner for calling the Police in the first place! All while the M.S.H.P. looks on! And what does The "savior" Capt. Johnson say about this?? "We had to evaluate the security of their Officers AND the RIOTERS!!! WTF?!?!?! I'm all for making sure that your troops are safe, but the last time I checked, RIOTERS and RIOTING are criminal offenses ( at least here in OH), henceforth making those person(s) committing such acts CRIMINALS!! So, Capt. Johnson, put on your "big boy" pants, and carry out your oath to "serve AND PROTECT", even if it means ticking off some of your "bros".

Suggest removal:

183steivo(462 comments)posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago

Its every man you himself in Ferguson as the police no longer respond to calls that store owners are being looted. The store owners are left to their own means to defeend their property. The top police official said that we had to be cognizant of the safety of the looters.

Suggest removal:

184steivo(462 comments)posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago

"Looters in Ferguson, Mo., were met with little police resistance Friday night and store owners say they were forced to protect their businesses with their own guns"

Suggest removal:

185steivo(462 comments)posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago

@ChessieDad,
It appears the Vindicator thinks that the political witch hunt against Rick Perry is news, but the riots and looting in Ferguson are not news.

Suggest removal:

186Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago

Yeah, it's obvious "political payback" by Hussein for Governor Perry making him look like a fool over the border crisis. How about this drunk Democrat who was the Chief of the Public Corruption unit (can anyone say "irony"?), on video after her arrest, screaming at the arresting Officers and kicking the cell doors, after testing nearly three times the limit for intoxication! And the head of the Texas Dems has the nerve to say Governor Perry "brought shame" to his office? What a sham! It just goes to show you that even though Hussein has done pretty much the same thing as Governor Perry did, using veto powers and his infamous "pen and phone", he has the audacity to bring charges for that, against Governor Perry. And if you don't believe Hussein was the driving force behind all of this, well I've got some swamp land for sale for you in the desert!

Suggest removal:

187steivo(462 comments)posted 2 weeks, 1 day ago

Just 885 more days of this misery.

Suggest removal:

188steivo(462 comments)posted 2 weeks, 1 day ago

The war crimes in Iraq continue???
-
According to the Defense Department, U.S. aircraft conducted 15 strikes on Monday near the Mosul Dam, hitting a range of Islamic State positions including a checkpoint, several armed vehicles and a vehicle-mounted anti-aircraft artillery gun.

Suggest removal:

189steivo(462 comments)posted 1 week, 6 days ago

Bush goes to war to get rid of Sadaam Hussein. Liar goes to war to get rid of ISIS. Absolutely no difference.

Suggest removal:

190steivo(462 comments)posted 1 week, 5 days ago

"Darren Wilson, the Ferguson, Mo., police officer whose fatal shooting of Michael Brown touched off more than a week of demonstrations, suffered severe facial injuries, including an orbital (eye socket) fracture, and was nearly beaten unconscious by Brown moments before firing his gun"
--
I guess the police officer should have waited until his other eye socket was broken too before defending himself.

Suggest removal:

191Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 week, 3 days ago

Muslim terrorists behead an American, on camera.

Husseins response to the American people...FORE!!!!

With a foreign policy like that, "more heads are gonna role" (sorry for the "pun", but the truth is the truth). I know I'm gonna be called "insensitive" for that comment, but what are you going to call the supposed leader of this Country, when he hits the "links", eight ( yeah, that's right, eight) minutes after making his weak remarks in regards to the incident?

Suggest removal:

192steivo(462 comments)posted 1 week, 3 days ago

I would be very happy to support using taxpayer funds to send him on a permanent golf vacation in return for his resignation.

Suggest removal:

193cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 week, 3 days ago

The president playing golf while Americans die.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TFczaat...

Suggest removal:

194Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 week, 2 days ago

So, cambridge, let's see if I understand your thought process, here....it's okay for Hussein to play golf, while an American is beheaded, because President Bush also played in a time of crisis? Ever heard of that simple, grade school, lesson; "two wrongs don't make a right?". Why not try and be a little more creative when trying to provide cover for Hussein, rather than immediately going to the "blame Bush" excuse? It's so "six, going on seven, years ago". Hey, I heard George Washington went boating on the Potomac, while the British were slaughtering Americans, here on our soil!

Suggest removal:

195steivo(462 comments)posted 1 week, 2 days ago

880

Suggest removal:

196cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 week, 2 days ago

chessiedad....it's funny that it upsets you that I post something about bush from six or seven years ago but you have no problem posting lies from teabagger emails that were proved lies six years ago by FactCheck, politifact and snopes. Then you even have the nerve too claim that your teabagger email is a more credible source. I will post anything any time I want and you can keep crying like a little baby.

As far as two wrongs, I don't have a problem with either one of them playing golf or the millions of others that have played golf since the reporter was killed. The guy knew the risks of his job. I feel bad for him, his family and friends but life goes on. To change our lives because of what Isis or anyone else does means they won. I'll live my life the way I always have, you go hide under your bed.

Suggest removal:

197Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 1 week, 2 days ago

FactCheck = Liberal; Politifact = Ultra-Liberal; Snopes = might as well just ask Hussein, himself to explain.

And I too, would prefer that Hussein stay on the golf course and continue his "bromance" with Alonzo. He can do little harm, there, and the only "leading" he needs to worry about is how much he needs to put on his putt on the eighteenth.

To pretend 9/11 never happened, and think that the lives of the families of the three-thousand Americans killed have not changed, just like the lives of Mr. Folly's family will be forever changed, well that's just irresponsible. But I get your mindset, it doesn't affect you directly, so you're not going to concern yourself with it. And believe me, I'm far from "hiding under my bed", because of it. I say "take the fight" to these killers, and with our "air superiority" and drone attacks, we can wipe them out, without any more "boots on the ground", with the exception of a few "spotters" to ID targets. But I know you liberals don't have the stomach for it, so let this new terror organization, which our own Secretary of Defense claims is "more dangerous and like nothing we have seen before", continue to build and gain momentum, and before long, we'll be asking another President why we didn't wipe them out, before they strike, here.

Suggest removal:

198cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 week, 2 days ago

You want to take the fight to these killers, be my guest tuff guy. Buy yourself a plain ticket and fly to Iraq and sign up with whichever religion you want to see kill the other. I know the Iraqi solders weren't interested, they dropped their guns and uniforms by the thousands. I'm sick of spending American lives and trillions of dollars on those fools. They'd be happy to see you, you'd fit right in.

FactCheck, politifact and snopes aren't connected to any political party. They call BS where they see it and your six year old teabagger email qualifies. Everything you claimed was in Obama's books were lies taken from your email. You're a fool.

Suggest removal:

199steivo(462 comments)posted 1 week, 2 days ago

"FactCheck = Liberal; Politifact = Ultra-Liberal; Snopes = might as well just ask Hussein, himself to explain." What's next, are they qoing to quote moveon.org?

Suggest removal:

200cambridge(2997 comments)posted 1 week, 1 day ago

skeevoeivo....you already said that in post 197.

Suggest removal:

201steivo(462 comments)posted 1 week, 1 day ago

Dumbridge,
No, I didn't.

Suggest removal:

202Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 6 days, 14 hours ago

Uh-oh, the "noose is starting to tighten" around Hussein's neck, as it's now been discovered that not only has the IRS been lying about Lois Lerner's e-mails being "forever lost", but an IRS attorney (who I'm sure is well aware of the penalties for perjury) admits that Lerner's cell phone was destroyed on purpose, after Congress started to investigate Hussein's targeting of conservatives by the IRS. How's that, for a "smidgen" of corruption!

Suggest removal:

203steivo(462 comments)posted 6 days, 12 hours ago

"Lois Lerner’s Blackberry was intentionally destroyed after Congress had begun its probe into IRS targeting of conservative groups, a senior IRS lawyer acknowledged in a sworn declaration.

Thomas Kane, Deputy Assistant Chief Counsel for the IRS, wrote in the declaration, part of a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch against the IRS, that the Blackberry was "removed or wiped clean of any sensitive or proprietary information and removed as scrap for disposal in June 2012."

Suggest removal:

204Chessiedad(194 comments)posted 4 days, 7 hours ago

Now the muslim terrorists are planning to use biological weapons of mass destruction, such as weaponized bubonic plague, and what's Hussein's plan to deal with this threat?....."Ummm...I really don't have a plan." WTF?!?!?! Hussein just spent two weeks planning his tax payer-funded, multi-million dollar "soirée" in Martha's Vineyard, yet no plan for dealing with these muslim terrorists who, in their own words, are claiming to "bring these attacks to an area (meaning America) near us!" Hussein sure had a "plan" to be on the golf course, eight minutes after giving a speech about the beheading of James Foley. He also had a plan to send those two racists, Al Sharpton and Eric Holder, to MO, to call for the head of Officer Wilson, and best of all, he sure has a plan to overlook the Constitution, Congress and our Laws, to sign some phony "treaty" about global warming. And, above all, Hussein's Justice Department's most recent report on the "terrorism threat" to the U.S.A. never mentions any threat from "muslim terrorists." I'm starting to think his "having no plan" is his "plan!"

Suggest removal:

205steivo(462 comments)posted 4 days, 6 hours ago

Well, at least he didn't get voted worst President since WWII for nothing.

Suggest removal:

206steivo(462 comments)posted 12 hours, 38 minutes ago

Another American Journalist killed in Syria and this poor excuse for a President plays golf.

Suggest removal:

207GTX66(343 comments)posted 12 hours ago

ISIS just beheaded another American and Obama does nothing. He should resign. He makes Carter look like a Genius. Resign or impeachment.

Suggest removal:

208steivo(462 comments)posted 11 hours, 49 minutes ago

This Liar makes a potted plant look like a beehive of activity.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport