facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Sorry, no featured jobs currently.

- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Belinky search warrant returned



Published: Tue, February 11, 2014 @ 12:00 a.m.
Download as PDF:
Belinky Documents

Search warrant and related documents regarding an investigation of Judge Mark A. Belinky.

By joe gorman

and David Skolnick

news@vindy.com

youngstown

Investigators seized campaign and financial records of Mahoning County Probate Judge Mark Belinky, looking for evidence to possibly file criminal charges, including engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, tampering with records, bribery, money laundering, theft, and theft in office, according to a search warrant.

Documents taken from Judge Belinky’s court office in Youngstown include bank records, campaign finance reports, lists of campaign donors, computers and electronic media, according to the return of a search warrant signed by Youngstown Municipal Judge Elizabeth Kobly. A search warrant also was served at his Windsor Road home in Boardman.

The state Bureau of Criminal Investigation served warrants Friday with the assistance of the FBI and the Mahoning County Sheriff’s Office.

Judge Belinky’s attorney, J. Gerald Ingram, declined to comment.

Judge Belinky also declined to comment earlier in the day other than to release a statement saying that despite the search Friday, the court is open for business. Judge Belinky said he has been advised by his lawyer not to say anything.

“I’d like to comment, but I’m not allowed,” the judge said.

Judge Belinky said he has not considered stepping down.

The returned warrant for the search of his home was not available Monday.

Items taken

Among campaign items taken during the three-hour search of his office are primary and general election campaign-finance reports from 2008, the year he was elected probate court judge; canceled checks from his failed 2004 race in the Democratic primary for county commissioner; and the campaign-finance report for the Committee For Our Future, which organized efforts in the mid- to late-2000s to urge approval of half-percent county sales- tax renewals.

Among bank and financial records, agents took bank statements from 2007 and 2007 tax returns; and an amended W4 form from 2007; financial disclosure statements from 2007 and 2008; and personal financial statements.

Agents also seized information regarding property belonging to the Venerose family in 2007. David Venerose Jr. was ordered to pay $67,000 by a visiting probate judge in 2011 to the estate of a woman, after questions arose about a woman who he was appointed a guardian over in probate court.

Venerose obtained authority from the woman in 2008 to handle her affairs, but Judge Belinky voided those documents in 2009, because of concerns over the woman’s health, living conditions and finances.

The case of the elderly woman, who has since died, went to Visiting Probate Judge Denny Clunk after Judge Belinky removed himself due to concerns expressed by Venerose over the judge’s ability to be impartial. Venerose had campaigned for Judge Scott Hunter against Judge Belinky in 2008.

Venerose was charged with perjury in the case, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to probation for one year.

The search warrant did not specify what information agents were looking for or why they took the Venerose information.

Also listed on the search warrant is an item termed “Oakhill notes,” which would likely be about a 73-count criminal indictment against county politicians and Anthony Cafaro Sr., a local businessman, all of whom opposed the relocation of the county Department of Job and Family Services from the Cafaro Co.-owned Garland Plaza on Youngstown’s East Side to the county-owned Oakhill Renaissance Place on the South Side.

The charges were dismissed in July 2011 after special prosecutors from the Ohio Ethics Commission and Lorain County said their inability to obtain about 2,000 hours of tape recordings held by the FBI and provide them to the defense made it impossible to proceed.

The warrant for Judge Belinky does not say what information is being sought or why that was taken. Like all the common pleas judges in the county, he signed two extensions of a grand jury investigating Oakhill.

Tax problems

Judge Belinky has battled tax problems in the past. In 2011, the IRS placed a lien on his home for owing $32,000 in income taxes from 2008 and 2009.

Judge Belinky and his wife were put on a payment plan to pay the taxes. The judge said then that the tax problems were caused because of income he earned when he closed out his private law practice, where he was self-employed at the same time he began his career on the bench.

Judge Belinky also had his paycheck garnished last year because of $20,000 he owed on a loan from 2008 plus more than $7,000 interest.

As probate judge, he makes about $105,000 annually.

Judge Belinky was appointed to the court in 2007 by former Gov. Ted Strickland to replace Judge Timothy Maloney, who retired. In 2008, Judge Belinky won re-election, beating Struthers Municipal Judge James Lanzo and Susan Maruca in the Democratic primary and then defeating Mahoning County Court Judge Scott Hunter in the general election.

In this year’s Democratic primary election, in which he filed paperwork to run last week, Judge Belinky faces a challenge from Maruca again as well as Christopher Sammarone.

As of Dec. 31, Judge Belinky had no money in his campaign fund. His committee also owes him $80,125 in loans he gave it during his various campaigns.

His opponents

“Obviously when you have law enforcement going into a court and removing files and computers, that raises alarms,” Maruca said. “Everybody has a right to be gravely concerned ... It’s a very serious, serious situation.”

Maruca criticized Judge Belinky’s Monday statement that read: “As a person, I have cooperated with law enforcement in this investigation and will continue to cooperate.”

“If you’re cooperating with law enforcement, they don’t need a search warrant,” she said. “There’s got to be more explanation than his one-sided statement.”

As for Belinky resigning, Maruca said there are rules in place for attorneys and “if there’s something that merits him stepping down then he should do it. I don’t know about the investigation’s details. He knows these rules and facts. He’ll have to act accordingly.”

Sammarone said, “It’s surprising to me the court is involved.”

When asked about stepping down, Sammarone said, “That’s a great question for Mark Belinky. I don’t know the extent of what’s being investigated.”

The investigation being made public less than three months before the May 6 Democratic primary “can help my campaign, but it’s not what I’m basing my campaign on,” Sammarone said. “Traditionally, it’s difficult to beat an incumbent.”

Disciplinary process

In Ohio, a “disciplinary counsel” investigates disciplinary matters pertaining to lawyers and judges, and prosecutes them before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline and the Ohio Supreme Court.

Scott Drexel, disciplinary counsel-designate, declined Monday to comment on legal issues concerning Judge Belinky because Drexel said those matters may come before him in his official capacity as disciplinary counsel or before the board.

Drexel, who is licensed to practice law in California, has been appointed by the board and confirmed by the Ohio Supreme Court but is still listed as disciplinary counsel-designate because his application for admission to the Ohio bar is pending.

Although he wouldn’t comment on the Belinky case, Drexel said that, if a judge is indicted on a felony criminal charge, “the Ohio Supreme Court would typically remove that judge from the bench pending the outcome of the criminal proceeding.”

Judge Belinky has not been charged with any crime.

The mere fact that a search warrant is served “doesn’t establish that the person upon whom it was served has committed any wrongdoing,” Drexel said.

As to whether a judge should stop hearing cases if his home or office are targets of search warrants, Drexel said: “That’s an individual decision to be made by the individual judge after reviewing and considering his or her responsibilities under the code of judicial conduct.”

Contributor: Staff writer Peter H. Milliken


Comments

1michael1757(294 comments)posted 10 months, 3 weeks ago

I always thought these"Loans" were gifts to the campaign.Do you get to use them for the campaign,then get that money back? I hope its not tax deductable.If you get it back,whats he runnin'? His own banking system?

Suggest removal:

2HenryTheBear(23 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Y'all are funny man!! Grown adults getting angry on comment section of the vindicator and it's always the same folks. Why am I not surprised the ring winged folks are the ones always trolling the comment sections online

Suggest removal:

3HenryTheBear(23 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Y'all are funny man!! Grown adults getting angry on comment section of the vindicator and it's always the same folks. Why am I not surprised the right winged folks are the ones always trolling the comment sections online

Suggest removal:

4vinglass(247 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

This is the first of many..fallout from Lisa's canary act. I think the big prize here is Tony Cafaro. I hope that Mommy Dearest Dellick gets caught up in it!

Suggest removal:

5JoeFromHubbard(1141 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Poor Mark, I wonder what kind of hair cut the government is going to give him?

Suggest removal:

6Dagwood(163 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Wonderful, now the oompa loompas will have to run the Chocolate Factory on their own.

Suggest removal:

7oldsouthhighwarrior(23 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

That picture of the Judge him? Or is that Richard Simmons. They look like brothers.

Suggest removal:

8walter_sobchak(1982 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

When a suspect hires J. Gerald Ingram as their legal counsel, they may not be guilty of the charges but they definitely did something wrong! At this point, he is looking at damage control and a plea-bargain so this creep can avoid jail. He is one fine looking human being though, huh?

Suggest removal:

9cambridge(3109 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Phil Spector!

https://www.google.com/search?q=phil+...

Suggest removal:

10dontbeafool(1102 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

I thought the pic was a lady. I remember a rediculous article a couple weeks ago about there being a long history of right wing bashing. I can't tell from these comments. If he is guilty, throw the book at him, because I am sure he threw the book at some undeserving people in the past, especially if he was taking bribes. I'm sure he let many off the hook as well. Nothing worse than a crooked judge. Maybe I will just take Eivo's strategy.... these are just trumped up charges by the right wing media and Republicans....lol

Suggest removal:

11Notorious_Pig(117 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Look, it doesn't matter what they find on this guy....Dingleberry Dave Betras will get Maruca right where he wants her. I just have to chuckle over the choices this great area gives us to vote for: Richard Simmons/Phil Spector look-alike or The Ambulance Chaser, Susan Maruca. I know that lots of people continue to bash the legal system around here, too. I am one of those people... but what does the public expect with the goofballs that are in that judges seat or public office??? It will never change.

Suggest removal:

12billdog1(1804 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Does he really not have the ability to see how silly he looks? Dang dude get your hair cut, loose a few pounds and push your glasses up on your nose. You look Bozo the Capped Kook.

Suggest removal:

13lumper(284 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

strickland appointed this guy and scott hunter couldn't beat him. what two giant losers those guys are !!!!

Suggest removal:

14rickking123(312 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

I don't think he gets along well with his brother Snow Miser either. But at least he can sing and dance.

I'm mister green Christmas
I'm mister sun
I'm mister heat blister
I'm mister 101.......

Suggest removal:

15lumper(284 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

belinky owes money to engler who owes it to bush who owes it to belinky !! where is don hanni when you need him. at least you knew who to pay and how much. david betrash needs to let the democrats learn that taxes must be paid and laws followed. and yes, if you get caught taking money and not paying taxes on it, that is tax evasion too. ask al capone. what do they do at these committee meetings besides eat donuts ? he should have classes on stealing from the public 101.

Suggest removal:

16wastepro(46 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Having unpaid Federal or State Taxes should be a automatic disqualifier for any Government position such as this. If he can't handle his own affairs why would anyone entrust him to handle ours.

Wake up Tri-County lets elect competent individuals!

Suggest removal:

17stuckinytown(18 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Who is a competent individual???

Suggest removal:

18YtownParent(350 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

If Belinky, or any elected official, did anything illegal then they should be booted out. There's the old adage about innocent until proven guilty and at this point he hasn't even been charged. So we'll see.

If personal debts, to private or government agents, were the litmus test for electability then almost ever President from Washington to Grant would have been barred from office.

Suggest removal:

19normanusiak(2 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

I believe it would be important for Vindicator readers (and those responsible for appointing the next probate judge) to read In re Estate of Usiak, 172 Ohio App.3d 262, 2007-Ohio 3038, at http://statecasefiles.justia.com/docu...
It would remind them of the monster that once occupied the probate bench (and the sycophants that perhaps remained). The Honorable Judges of the Court of Appeals (Seventh District) did their best to restore justice (the Governor and Attorney General, at the time, refused to do anything). After reading what my family and many others had to go through, I'm certain the community wouldn't want to see the names Machuga, Burgess, Maloney or anyone associated with them appointed/nominated to anything.

Suggest removal:

20normanusiak(2 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

BTW: Judge Maloney announced his intention to retire the day before my father's case was made public. That Governor and Attorney General should have garnished his retirement checks to pay back all those that he improperly caused unnecessary legal expenses.

Suggest removal:

21YtownParent(350 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

The jury is still out on Belinky. But normanusiak is correct. Maloney's probate court was a disorganized inefficient, in effective mess. The largest impact Belinky made on the court was making the staff stay till the end of the day they were being paid for. Unlike Maloney's court that was empty come 3:30pm.

The Crawford family, who saw 6 members killed by an arsonist in 2008, are not the only community members who have endorsed Belinky for the way he runs his court. So we'll see. Going strictly on appearances though, I'd expect a crook to look more like a slick lawyer than a clown out of Steven King novel .

Suggest removal:

22Trumbull_County_Researcher(1 comment)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Researching case number 1989 GI 00013 it involved Mahoning County Probate Judge Mark Belinky . Looking at the case it looks like conflict of interest. He was involved in multiple interests, in which could possibly corrupt the motivation. How could he be the Attorney for a case and withdrew and turn around and Judge the case?

Suggest removal:

23lumper(284 comments)posted 10 months, 2 weeks ago

mr. usiak : you were essentially being shook down by maloney. friends of mine were also. their will was similar- to be split amongst surviving children, maloney wouldn't let it in without a local attorney -which the family finally did- then there is a small clause about the attorney's fee being some fixed percentage "or whatever the court deems " the court then deemed that the probate attorney fees should be doubled. do ya think the appointed attorney kicked back most of the fee ?

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes