- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

BP pulls out of Trumbull's Utica shale

Published: Wed, April 30, 2014 @ 12:01 a.m.

RELATED: Industry poll shows widespread support




As BP looks to sell off its 105,000-acre leasehold in Northeast Ohio, uncertainty surrounds the future of the Utica Shale play’s northern tier, which so far has proved a far-less-than-lucrative venture.

The British energy producer on Tuesday announced it would pull out of the Utica Shale, after a lackluster appraisal of four producing wells in Trumbull County.

In its quarterly earnings report, the company said it has taken a $521 million write-off relating to its Utica acreage.

Just two months ago, Trumbull County’s other major player, Houston-based drilling company Halcon Operating Co., said it would suspend its Utica drilling operations, pending results from two of its wells. Halcon’s CEO and chairman said at the time that early results “haven’t been too wonderful.”

Both companies struggled to unlock the northern end of the play, where the desired rock is thinner and located at a shallower depth than it is in the south, where production in places such as Carroll and Harrison counties has taken off.

Whether the news means the Valley’s shale boom is stalled is open to interpretation.

Mike Chadsey, a spokesman for the Ohio Oil and Gas Association, said he expects the Mahoning Valley to play a supporting role in building out the infrastructure to support the southern tier of the play, via other successes such as the VAM USA LLC steel-pipe-threading facility.

The Vallourec Star subsidiary invested $81.5 million for its construction at the former Genmak Steel building and an additional 67,500 square feet nearby in the city’s Ohio Works Business Park. The facility would employ 84 full-time workers by early next year.

In the meantime, Chadsey believes the industry will continue to develop technology that could one day solve the puzzle of the north.

“There’s something up there — we just haven’t figured it out yet,” he said.

It had been long rumored that BP’s positioning in the Utica would fail to produce the kind of return necessary for continued investment here.

According to fourth-quarter well results published by the Ohio

Department of Natural Resources, BP produced an average of 1,004 barrels of oil and 14,507 Mcf (thousand cubic feet) of natural gas per well. Those figures are well below average production.

For example, of the 352 wells producing across the play, ODNR recorded average oil production at 4,089 barrels per well, and the average amount of natural gas produced stood at 122,514 Mcf.

“Following our decision to create a separate business around our U.S. lower 48 onshore oil and gas activities, and as a consequence of disappointing appraisal results, we have decided not to proceed with development plans in the Utica shale,” BP said Tuesday.

Instead, BP spokesman Curtis Thomas said the company will market its leasehold, adding that BP’s decision “doesn’t mean it’s not a viable play for another oil and gas company.”

But Will Green, an exploration and production analyst for the investment firm Stephens Inc., said the exit of two big players would make for a difficult sell.

Smaller companies with the ability to drive down drilling costs may target some operations in the “better parts” of BP’s acreage, but the area’s track record would hinder companies looking to buy up rights to large swaths of land, he said.

Chadsey said drillers looking to purchase BP and Halcon leaseholds face a combination of uncertainty and the threat of poor returns. He cited the murky status of the state’s severance-tax proposal and the occurrence of local earthquakes as possible deterrents.

“That’s going to put a damper on some risk-taking,” he said.

Tuesday’s news was disheartening for landowners hoping to cash in on royalty interests, built into the leasing agreements they signed with drilling companies.

Negotiated in late 2011 and early 2012, BP’s agreements numbered in the thousands and offered landowners a percentage of the value of the minerals extracted from their property, should the company drill there.

Though landowners often received sizable signing bonuses in exchange for signing over mineral rights, they also were enticed by a possibility of an even greater windfall from royalty interests.

Whether landowners will eventually see those royalties depends on future interest in the northern part of the Utica, but it also comes down to the price tag BP assigns to its acreage, said Alan Wenger, an attorney for the law firm of the Harrington, Hoppe & Mitchell, who helped negotiate the leases.

Most established a window of five years for drilling to begin, with a three-year renewal period. All the original conditions would remain in place if the ownership changes hands, he said.


1handymandave(578 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

Thanks for the memories. We will remember your drilling efforts when we think of snow in Ohio at the end of April, contaminated drinking water, oil filled fisheries in Florida, and damaged roadways from your trucks.

Suggest removal:

2JoeFromHubbard(1776 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

The only unfortunate thing is that BP spent as much money as it did only to have a poor return on investment.

Not all wells are gushers, some are dry holes, and others, as in Trumbull County, fail to produce economically.

It is the nature of the business. They take it in stride.

I wonder if the fracophobics will hold a celebration rally in Central Square?

Suggest removal:

3walter_sobchak(2674 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

So, Jeff, was it also the Tea Party frackpots that allowed other oil and gas companies to enter the market in Holmes and Carroll counties where the shale play has proved to be very lucrative? Was it the Tea Party frackpots that allowed the French scumbags to invest $1B in the steel mill that produces OCTG in Y-town? As a small-thinking f****in' troll, you don't understand business, equity and return on investment. BP will take an accounting charge against other income from areas where it makes a better return for the company. They may well sell their leases to another company that will develop a process to effectively extract the minerals (and thereby damage Mother Earth).

Suggest removal:

4JoeFromHubbard(1776 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

@ JRBYoungstown:

"Make the rich richer"

Are you angry, jealous, or both?

Don't let that ruin your day. You need to invest in the petroleum industry and share in the wealth.

There are many ways to do that without being "wealthy" in the first place.

Suggest removal:

5JoeFromHubbard(1776 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

Just read in the Wall Street Journal that BP announced an 8.3% dividend increase.

Suggest removal:

6cambridge(4066 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

There are many clean, green and renewable companies you can invest in also. I bought Tesla at 26.16 a share and at the moment it's trading at 206 a share. Solar City is another good investment and I think NRG Energy and Sunpower Corporations are comers just to name a few, there are many others. Personally I would rather invest in the energy of the future rather than the energy of the past.

Suggest removal:

7billdog1(5787 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

B_Jeff, now that's funny I don't care who you are. I'd pay good money to watch him clean a few toilets with out a glove. Presently I bet he pays somebody to wipe his own butt so he don't take the risk of a smear on his finger.

Suggest removal:

8billdog1(5787 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

The headline makes me think of a movie.

I remember one time at band camp, I pulled out.

Suggest removal:

9topper11(708 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

Hopefully, most of the Tea Party frackpots already lost all their bonus money at the casino or donating to scam artists like Sarah Palin and Chris Christie. Those morons will never learn, will they
-Looks like someone does not like tea

Suggest removal:

10exlonghorn(45 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

At least now we can all now stop this foolish pursuit and look forward to the day when our main renewable energy source is Unicorn farts

Suggest removal:

11DSquared(1778 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

Bye-Bye tax revenue! That's OK, We're fat with money in the Valley anyway!

Suggest removal:

12rickking123(330 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

The future is green. Just ask Solyndra and Fiskar. Two giant green energy scams.

Suggest removal:

13DSquared(1778 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

Exlonghorn, Don't forget the Pixie Dust and Moonbeams!

Suggest removal:

14walter_sobchak(2674 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

Well, I guess you put me in my place! Any time you want to buy me out (whatever that means) go ahead. I'll tell you where to send the check. On a side note, I think I finally found someone desperate enough to date you sister!

Suggest removal:

1576Ytown(1346 comments)posted 2 years, 2 months ago

Insanity is the definition of doing the same thing expecting different results.

Green energy may not be the energy savior we'd like, but it is a start. We have to be open to weaning ourselves from fossil fuels. If we can find a way to use 50% less rather than trying to produce 50% more we're much better off. Invent a safer way to extract natural gas without destroying our planet and we'll all live happily after!

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes