facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Sorry, no featured jobs currently.

- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Failure to renew sales tax in Mahoning County would put government in jeopardy



Published: Sat, April 26, 2014 @ 12:00 a.m.

In January and again this month, we took Mahoning County officials to task for being so out of touch with the region’s economic condition that they thought nothing of raising the pay of generally well-compensated government workers.

Here’s what we said in one of the editorials: “Granting pay raises to public employees in the midst of an anticipated general fund shortfall is arrogant. It says to private-sector taxpayers struggling to make ends meet that their economic well-being is less important than that of public employees.”

We have long believed that government payrolls should reflect what’s occurring in the private. Why? For the simple reason that government is not self-sustaining; it depends on taxpayer dollars to survive. Almost 80 percent of the operating budget is swallowed up by wages and benefits, which means pay hikes are a sure way to get the public roiled.

That’s what happened in January when the county board of elections granted a 3 percent increase to its employees. But in the face of extensive Vindicator reporting that triggered widespread criticism of public sector, the board of elections withdrew the raises.

But then in April, this newspaper again revealed that more than 700 county employees received increases of more than 3 percent in the last two years. They were for a variety of reasons, including pension fixes.

Thus, our condemnation of the decision-makers who see nothing wrong in fattening the wallets of their workers while those in the private sector continue to reel from the national economic recession that began in late 2008.

Against that backdrop, readers will undoubtedly wonder why this newspaper supports the renewal of the 0.5 percent sales tax — Issue 2 on the May 6 primary ballot.

The answer we offer today is the same as it was in May 2010 when this tax was put up for renewal for five years. It expires in September 2015.

“The voters in Mahoning County have it in their power to throw the county into chaos,” we said then.

The county collects two half-percent sales taxes, one of which is permanent. The second one up for a vote next month would also be permanent. The change from a five-year to a continuous period is just as controversial as the pay raises granted in the midst of a recession.

We certainly find merit in the argument that having the tax on the ballot every five years forces the county commissioners and other government officials to justify the expenditure of tax dollars to the public.

That said, we believe there’s a strong case to be made for permanency. It enables the commissioners, who control the general fund purse strings, to plan for the future and to undertake long-range budgeting. Thirty county departments depend on the general fund, with the criminal justice system — the sheriff’s department, the jail, juvenile division and various courts — accounting for more than 70 percent of the $50.2 million general-fund budget for 2014. The two sales taxes generate about $31 million; the rest comes from investment income, the state Local Government Fund allocation and federal funds.

Revenue losses

A comparison of 2008 with 2013 shows that the general fund lost $3.2 million in investment income, $2.9 million in state funding and $4.4 million from housing federal prisoners in the county jail.

We are well aware that if the renewal is turned down in May, the commissioners will be able to place the tax before the voters in November and then in May 2015, if needed.

There’s an argument being made that residents should vote “no” next month, thus sending a message to commissioners Anthony Traficanti, Carol Rimedio-Righetti and David Ditzler that a permanent tax is a deal breaker.

Our concern with such thinking has to do with the attitude of the voters. Once residents say “no,” it becomes much easier to say it again a second and third time.

The risk of the 0.5 percent sales tax being wiped off the books is just too great.

Readers will remember what occurred in the county when one of the taxes was repealed some years ago. Not surprisingly, the criminal justice system was hardest hit, with the sheriff’s department being forced to layoff deputies and close pods in the county jail. The resultant prisoner overcrowding triggered federal lawsuits and judicial consent decrees.

It should be clear by now that renewal of the sales tax is a public-safety issue. Mahoning County cannot risk having to keep criminals on the streets because the jail is short-staffed.

Our endorsement of the renewal, however, should not be viewed as forgiveness for the poor judgment and mismanagement on the part of some officeholder and managers.

We expect the commissioners to lead the effort to fix what’s broken, especially the payroll that is the root of the public’s anger.


Comments

1rickking123(312 comments)posted 8 months ago

Vote No.

A yes vote will just make it easier for more pay raises to be granted and the fiscal irresponsibility to continue.

Let the Commissioners see that the voters don't appreciate the shenanigans that have occurred during these last few years.

Suggest removal:

2questionreality(371 comments)posted 8 months ago

Am I reading from 'the Onion' or the Vindicator??

Suggest removal:

3republicanRick(1252 comments)posted 8 months ago

So once again the taxpayers should TRUST that our elected officials spend the money wisely?

Why not wait till we SEE that elected officials spend our money wisely, and then grant them the tax money.

With all these pay increases the Mahoning County Commissioners have granted, it is clear they cannot be trusted to manage our tax money.

Suggest removal:

4redeye1(4714 comments)posted 8 months ago

My family and I will be voting NO on all tax issues on the ballot. We will also be voting against any incumbent who is running for any office. It's time for new people will new and fresh ideas. I'm getting really tired of supporting others. If they don't like their job they can go get another one .I' m sure there are people who would who like their jobs. I would like to keep some of my HARD EARNED money for my family and I for once.

Suggest removal:

5NoBS(2013 comments)posted 8 months ago

We voters gave the county one of the two levies that funds it a permanent levy. They have income they can depend on. We voters want some measure of control over the other half. This was made clear when the permanent levy was passed. If anything, recent performances by elected and appointed officials have made it more obvious than ever that we need to retain control over the purse strings.

Sorry, Mahoning County. You're giving us an ultimatum with this "Permanent or else" levy. Be ready to deal with the fall out.

Suggest removal:

6JustThink123(27 comments)posted 8 months ago

Including myself, I dont know a single person in the private sector that pays 25% towards their healthcare. Where does that fake number come from? Every person i know in the private sector pays between 5% and 15% of their health care costs.

Suggest removal:

7ytown1(392 comments)posted 8 months ago

JustThink123 I recommend you do a little research, below is a short excerpt from a article in the New York Time that I have supplied the link to.

http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/0...

Employees paid, on average, about 23 percent of total premium costs last year, and are expected to pay nearly a quarter in 2013, as companies take steps to control their costs. In terms of paycheck deductions, this translates into an average employee contribution of $2,658 to premiums in 2012. That is expected to rise to $2,888 in 2013 — an increase of nearly 9 percent in one year.

Just Say'in, a little research goes a long way.

Suggest removal:

8ytown1(392 comments)posted 8 months ago

I would also like to remind the Vindy that the original plan by the county commissioners was to not only make the 2nd 1/2 percent sales tax permanent but to also add an additional 1/4 percent sales tax on top of the other two until they heard all the rumbling under their feet.

Only to then rescind the 1/4 percent to make sure that they can get the other passed and to have it permanent, and then we all know what would happen in the fall, they would be then asking again for that same 1/4 percent sales tax that they say they so desperately need. But do they really need it.

I also need to point out that this 1/2 percent sales tax does not expire until 2015 so I really do not have any idea why this should even be on the ballot at this time. Or they hedging their bet that a low voter turnout will ensure easy passage, maybe they forget that the vast majority of citizens have not seen raises like they have enjoyed and will defeat this tax completely for being so arrogant.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes