facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Rhetoric in Mahoning probate judge race escalates



Published: Thu, April 10, 2014 @ 12:04 a.m.

youngstown

photo

Sammarone

photo

Betras

By David Skolnick

skolnick@vindy.com

YOUNGSTOWN

The war of words is escalating between Christopher Sammarone, a Democrat running for Mahoning County Probate Court judge, and the county Democratic Party Chairman David Betras.

And the war is based on two words — “a leader” — who said it and when.

Sammarone’s campaign literature prominently uses the words attributed to Jim Tressel, who was the candidate’s football coach at Youngstown State University in the early 1990s.

The two words are part of a longer quote from Tressel in the Aug. 21, 1994, edition of The Vindicator in which the coach praises the leadership qualities of Sammarone on the team.

Betras said he thinks it’s deceptive to use a 20-year-old-plus comment in a political ad about a candidate’s college football days.

“It’s clear to me it’s meant to imply Tressel is endorsing him,” Betras said. “Put it in context.”

The county party is backing Susan Maruca, Betras’ former law partner, for probate court.

Sammarone, who had a press conference Wednesday on this, said he’s “disappointed in Betras and Mrs. Maruca that they would attempt to discredit my campaign by attacking a time in my life that is precious to me” and Tressel, whom he called a “mentor, friend and coach.”

Sammarone added that this is an “attempt by Betras and Maruca to cloud the real issues in this race,” which are “the qualifications and experience” of the two candidates who are squaring off in the Democratic primary on May 6.

The dispute, first reported Tuesday on vindy.com, has Sammarone and Betras exchanging heated words and accusations.

After seeing Sammarone’s campaign materials with the Tressel quote, Maruca had her campaign attorney, Donald McTigue, send Sammarone a letter asking him to remove the quote because it “misleads the voters.”

Maruca said she spoke to Tressel on Sunday when she saw him at a Boardman High School event, and he told her he’s not endorsing any candidate in the probate-court race.

Sammarone said Tressel agreed to be one of his references as the county Republican Party decides who it will recommend to Gov. John Kasich to replace Mark Belinky as probate court judge. Belinky, under criminal investigation by the state, resigned March 14.

“Having someone as a reference is not an endorsement,” Betras said.

Sammarone said he didn’t ask Tressel to endorse him, and “my literature doesn’t state that he does. He does not get involved in political campaigns. Now I see why.”

Betras and Maruca said all Sammarone had to do was include “YSU, 1994” after Tressel’s name and quote, and there wouldn’t be an issue.

In response, Sammarone said, “You could clarify it, but I didn’t think it was necessary” as everyone but Betras and Maruca could tell it was an old quote about his football days at YSU.

Sammarone said, “Tressel believed in uniting this community and everybody being on the same page. Betras would rather divide the community.”

Betras responded: “The real issue is integrity with the voters. If you’ll say anything to win, we don’t need that type of candidate.”

The quote on Sammarone’s campaign materials prompted a response Tuesday by Tressel, the University of Akron’s executive vice president for student success, through Eileen Korey, the school’s chief communications officer.

That statement said Tressel heard about the quote, that it came from a Vindicator article when Sammarone played for him, and declined to discuss it further.

Sammarone said he spoke to Tressel late Tuesday, and his former coach offered to discuss the issue with the media.

On Wednesday, Tressel again relayed comments through Korey.

“He did in fact tell Chris that he would stand by statements he made about him back when he was coach Tressel and Chris was on his team,” Korey said. “Jim also said that if he’s out in the community, and a reporter asks him about these previous statements, he would reaffirm them.” But Tressel again wouldn’t comment further on the issue, she said.

Also, Sammarone and Bryan Ridder, the candidate and the campaign’s co-counsel, called a text message sent by Betras to John Shultz, an attorney backing Sammarone, a “threat.”

The Betras text, forwarded to Ridder by Shultz, reads: “Y is ur candidate doing this. We have another surprise coming. LOL.”

“It’s another attempt to muddy up the issues,” Sammarone said. “It’s a threat. I don’t know how else you could perceive it as anything but a threat.”

Betras said it wasn’t a threat, and he was responding to numerous text messages from Shultz, who was trying to bait him.

“There’s nothing nefarious about it,” Betras said

The “surprise” was a response by Kathy DiChristofaro, head of the Ohio Democratic Women’s Caucus, and Tina Morell, president of the Federated Democratic Women of Ohio to comments in Wednesday’s Vindicator from Sammarone that with Belinky out of the Democratic primary would help his campaign as Belinky was splitting “male voters.”

DiChristofaro said that “it’s unfortunate” that Sammarone’s comment “reduced our democratic process to imply all the males line up to vote for male candidates.”

Morell added that Democrats “vote for candidates based on whether they’re fit for office, not on factors like gender, age, or race.”

Sammarone said, “I would hope people wouldn’t vote along the lines of male and female, but some people do.”


Comments

1Joe6pack(52 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

Mayor Chuck Sammarone lets sexual harassment incidents occur as if it's no big deal and makes cash contributions that are illegal. You make a fine example of good government Chuck.

Now his son Chris thinks it's the 1960's and the "men" will take care of this "woman" who has no business running for judge.

What planet is the Sammarone family living on? It's 2014 not 1960!

Misleading statements, no respect for women and unfounded charges are what Chris Sammarone is offering the voters as the reasons to vote for him, sorry Chris you are not getting my vote. Your friends Alan and John aren't helping your cause either.

My wife, my children and I will be voting for Susan Maruca. We hope everyone else will vote for Susan, she will make a great Probate Judge.

Suggest removal:

2Kernaloftruth(86 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

Her peers in an anonymous survey process found her UNQUALIFIED, like she was found 6 years ago. When people in her own profession can't support her why on earth should the rest of us?

Suggest removal:

3eyemhip(4 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

Hey folks, do you smell that? Smells like desperation to me. There is nothing wrong with his ad. It is not a lie nor is it out of context. I believe that the wheels are beginning to fall off the chairman's train. DB, start with the facts, stop with the innuendo. If she is the better candidate, FOCUS ON THAT! PROVE IT! Your desperation is going to betray you.

Suggest removal:

4YtownSports(227 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

Betras and Sammarone need to stop back-biting. It makes Betras look petty and Sammarone's responses aren't helping his candidacy (Betras's hope/plan?).

Suggest removal:

5TiredTaxpayer(44 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

Sammarone sounds like a neanderthal everytime he opens his mouth. Boys vs. girls. Really? He is running for one of the most important offices in the County and Sammarone sounds like he's on the school yard playground. He doesn't seem to think or conduct himself like a judge if you ask me.

Suggest removal:

6Nurse_Midlo(34 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

Sammarone - a crook like his father!

Suggest removal:

7uptowngirl(110 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

All I can say is fun to watch!

Suggest removal:

8harleydog(207 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

Dave Betras is a moron. He tries to bully people. No one likes to hear your big mouth. Go away you idiot. I am a republican and I will vote for Sammarone. Maruca is not qualified and because she is endorsed by the Dumbocrats gives me further reason not to vote for her, that and fat mouth Betras

Suggest removal:

9listener(108 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

The attorneys that live off the probate court have cause to worry that the gravy train is coming to an end. As far as I can tell the only people voting for Sammarone are those attorneys on the gravy train.

Lets talk about real experience over experience that has nothing to do with the court.

Maruca, has run a multi-million dollar legal office with over 50 employees in three states.

Sammarone, has played football, run a one man office, and has no experience beyond the borders of Mahoning County.

No question Maruca is the most qualified no matter what the bought off Bar Association says.

We also have to question why the Belinky people are supporting Sammarone and what does that tell you???

If we want to reform the probate court Maruca is the only choice.

Suggest removal:

10Hmmmmm(48 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

How is ATTY Sammarone a MCDD ,MAHONING COUNTY ,employee able to run for office.Someone please help me with this . I thought there were laws against this.

Suggest removal:

11nojimbo(223 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

Actually, neither of these two are qualified to be Probate Judge. There are a couple attorneys trying for the appointment that are qualified but not these two.

Hopefully, the Governor's office will select someone with actual significant probate law experience and that person will be able to defeat these two who simply represent competing corrupt machines.

Suggest removal:

12Petunia(27 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

I think its time to look at other candidates rather than these two political wannabes. The comment about Sammarone being the MCDD attorney is interesting, but don't forget he also represented Lien Forward. How did this happen? Also, how much free financial assistance did his "bar" receive from the City and State? What's the old acorn saying?

And as for Maruca, doesn't she have closer ties to Betras than just being his former law partner? It is known to many voters in the Valley and especially Betras's fellow parishoners that he is a philanderer. He should be removed from the party and probably have his law license permanently cancelled. Why can't Youngstown and Mahoning County get qualified, honest and upright candidates for office?

Suggest removal:

13ysuforever(56 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

Well here we go again ,more personal attacks about David Betras.Betras is totally right ,if the quote indicated the year it wouldn't be an issue.Since Mr Tressel is the choice of so many Valley residents to be the next YSU president the quote looks like an attempt to grab all of Mr Tressels supporters votes,Mr Betras is asking for honesty and since again who knows our esteemed leader and Valley icon knows his personal integrity and honesty is beyond reproach.Betras is revered state -wide as the best Demcratic county chair and candidates state-wide look to him for political wisdom and advice.The Repubs slinging personal attacks and rumors about Chairman Betras are the best example of why their local party is a laughing stock state-wide while Betras is a lock to be the next Dem State Chair due to his abilty to get candidates elected and his personal qualities that are beyond reproach in spite of the haters who spit venom when ever they see his name in print

Suggest removal:

14listener(108 comments)posted 4 months, 3 weeks ago

ysuforever you must be Betras or on crack. Betras is hurting Maruca and Betras hurts every democrat in Mahoning County and will NEVER become the state chairman.

Suggest removal:

15charmed(9 comments)posted 4 months, 2 weeks ago

The ppl that dont like sammarones father: are they mad they have to punch a time clock?cant play angry birds on city cell phone? Cant treat tacpayer money like they won lottery? Susan msruca is like her father, she just hasnt gone to jail for racketeering yet, like him.she. has had good teachers ...marc dann,jak campbell,lynn bruno.the apple doesnt fall far from the tree in y twn we always learn this to late like w belinkey.in susans case maybe her political opponents will be found in the mahoning river

Suggest removal:

16ysuforever(56 comments)posted 4 months, 2 weeks ago

I am not David Betras or on crack ,but am a well respected political leader who greatly admires David Betras as a county chairman who delivers votes for the party endorsed candidates.Betras consistently is named top county chairman in Ohio and has the respect and admiration of Dems throughout the state,Hopefully our statewide ticket will prevail against Kasich and the rest of the GOP ticket but if they fail Betras is the peoples choice to replace Redfern.Betras is an astute leader who is a true visionary ,He is a Valley icon who is truly YTOWN proud.The only reason he wouldn't take the state chairmans role is that he would miss our beloved Valley.I think he deserves a statue for the hometown pride he always displays and for being the honest ethical and caring leader that he is.

Suggest removal:

17listener(108 comments)posted 4 months, 2 weeks ago

I am a friend of the "respected" political leaders (which can be named on less than one hand) and NONE of them respect Betras. In fact even the political hacks here don't respect Betras. Only you ysuforever seem to respect someone that lies to everyone, makes deals he doesn't live up to, and would screw over his own mother if he thought it would get him ahead. His endorsed candidates win due to the elections being fixed, that's why the Board of Elections is being investigated. Only the delusional Betras believes in his own mind he could become state party chair, the other county chairs are smart enough not to elect Betras chair of the state party or anything else.

Suggest removal:

18bmanresident(597 comments)posted 4 months, 2 weeks ago

I've had the opportunity of meeting Mr. Sammarone and I can tell you, he is a feminine cleaning product.

Suggest removal:

19Atowncomm(14 comments)posted 4 months, 2 weeks ago

Reviewing these candidates' campaign comments made of each other about each other only forces the voters to chose the lesser of the evils.

It would be nice to hear just the facts, experience, credentials, and what you are offering to the position. As you are trying to get these points across, your campaigns are muddying the waters. And the voters cannot see clearly.

What is being seen is that none of you deserve to be probate judge! Same Mahoning County politics are, once again, being featured.

Suggest removal:

202muchtax(313 comments)posted 4 months, 1 week ago

Whomever wins Mauruca or Samarone will have to go up against a independent who has the guts to run as an independent! His name will be out soon, vote Independent! These two do not deserve to judge others!

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport