facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Shutdown nearing, GOP seeks health care delay



Published: Sun, September 29, 2013 @ 12:00 a.m.

Assocaited Press

WASHINGTON

Locked in a deepening struggle with President Barack Obama, the Republican-controlled House pushed legislation toward passage Saturday night imposing a one-year delay on parts of the nation’s new health care law and repealing a tax on medical devices as the price for avoiding a partial government shutdown in a few days’ time.

Senate Democrats pledged to reject the measure even before the House began debating it, and the White House issued a statement vowing a veto in any event. Republicans are pursuing “a narrow ideological agenda ... and pushing the government towards shutdown,” it said.

As the day wore on, even some Republicans said privately they feared that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., held the advantage in the fast-approaching end game. If so, a House GOP rank and file that includes numerous tea-party allies would soon have to choose between triggering the first partial shutdown in nearly two decades — or coming away from the confrontation empty-handed.

Undeterred, House Republicans pressed ahead with their latest attempt to squeeze a concession from the White House in exchange for letting the government open for business normally Tuesday.

“Obamacare is based on a limitless government, bureaucratic arrogance and a disregard of a will of the people,” said Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind.

Another Republican, Rep. Darrell Issa of California, reacted angrily when asked whether he would eventually support a standalone spending bill if needed to prevent a shutdown. “How dare you presume a failure? How dare you? How dare you?” he said.

Apart from its impact on the health care law, the legislation that House Republicans decided to back would assure routine funding for government agencies through Dec. 15. A companion measure headed for approval assures U.S. troops are paid in the event of a shutdown.

The government spending measure marked something of a reduction in demands by House Republicans, who passed legislation several days ago that would permanently strip the health care law of money while providing funding for the government.

It also contained significant concessions from a party that long has criticized the health care law for imposing numerous government mandates on industry, in some cases far exceeding what Republicans have been willing to support in the past.

Acknowledging as much, Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said that as a conservative, he had often found during Obama’s presidency that his choice was “between something bad or [something] horrible.”

GOP aides said that under the legislation headed toward a vote, most portions of the health law that already have gone into effect would remain unchanged.

That includes requirements for insurance companies to guarantee coverage for pre-existing conditions and to require children to be covered on their parents’ plans until age 26.

It would not change a part of the law that reduces costs for seniors with high prescription drug expenses.

One exception would give insurers or others the right not to provide abortion coverage, based on religious or moral objections.

The measure would delay implementation of a requirement for all individuals to purchase coverage or face a penalty, and of a separate feature of the law that will create marketplaces where individuals can shop for coverage from private insurers.

By repealing the medical device tax, the GOP measure also would raise deficits.

The Senate rejected the most recent House-passed anti-shutdown bill on a party-line vote of 54-44 Friday, insisting on a straightforward continuation in government funding without health care-related add-ons.

That left the next step up to the House — with time to avert a partial shutdown growing ever shorter.

For a moment at least, the revised House proposal papered over a simmering dispute between Speaker John Boehner and the rest of the leadership, and tea- party conservatives who have been more militant about abolishing the health law that all Republican lawmakers oppose.

It was unclear whether members of the rank and file had consulted with Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who has become the face of the “Defund Obamacare” campaign that tea party organizations are promoting and using as a fundraising tool.

In debate on the House floor, Republicans adamantly rejected charges that they seek a government shutdown, and said their goal is to spare the nation from the effects of a law they said would cost jobs and reduce the quality of care. The law is an “attack and an assault on the free enterprise and the free economy,” said Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas.

Democrats disagreed vociferously. “House Republicans are shutting down the government. They’re doing it intentionally. They’re doing it on purpose,” said Rep. Donna Edwards of Maryland, as Republican lawmakers booed from their seats on the floor.

In the Senate, there was little doubt that Reid had the votes to block a one-year delay in the health care program widely known as “Obamacare.” He said the same was true for the repeal of the medical device tax, even though 33 Democrats joined all Senate Republicans in supporting repeal on a nonbinding vote earlier in the year.

The 2.3 percent tax, which took effect in January, is imposed on items such as pacemakers and CT scan machines; eyeglasses, contact lenses, hearing aids and other items are exempt. Repealing it would cost the government an estimated $29 billion over the coming decade.

If lawmakers miss the approaching deadline, a wide range of federal programs would be affected, from the national parks to the Pentagon.

Some critical services such patrolling the borders, inspecting meat and controlling air traffic would continue. Social Security benefits would be sent and the Medicare and Medicaid health care programs for the elderly and poor would continue to pay doctors and hospitals.

The new health insurance exchanges would open Tuesday, a development that’s lent urgency to the drive to use a normally routine stopgap spending bill to gut implementation of the law.

———

Associated Press writer Alan Fram and radio reporter Gerry Bodlander contributed to this report.


Comments

1parlayhenry(148 comments)posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago

Let's use some logic and some math here first to address what is going on:
1.Obama won in 2008. The MAJORITYof the people liked his policies on health care and elected him.
2. The ACA was challenged in the Supreme Court and passed that test.
3. Mitt Romney's pledge, which was the biggest card he had to play in 2012, was that on his 1st day in office he would repeal "Obamacare". He lost and Obama won.

So let's do our math; that's 3 votes for the ACA and, let's see, none against the ACA.
So why then, do RepubliKKKans in congress insist that the American people don't want the ACA? They voted twice and said they did. So the electorate doesn't matter? Voting doesn't count unless the RepubliKKKan right get's it's way?
Why don't the RepubliKKKans and the Tea Party lunatics just be honest and amend the bill to reflect what they've wanted all along and quit using the ACA as a surrogate; just say no budget or raising of the debt ceiling unless Obama resigns (or finds a way to become all-white instead of half-white). I mean, what's the difference? The RepubliKKKans are holding the country ransom and declaring a RepubliKKKan dictatorship that nullifies the elections. We might as well be living in Egypt. Nullify the elections and throw Obama and the Democrats into prison.

Suggest removal:

2SeriouslyNow(192 comments)posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago

Please correct me if I'm wrong....
60% of the American population has health coverage through an Employee Sponsored Insurance (ESI). These people are NOT required to purchase insurance on the ACA exchange.

34% of the American population has their health coverage through the government (military, medicare and medicaid). These people are NOT required to purchase insurance on the ACA exchange.

Looks like the ACA exchange requirement applies to just 6% of the population. Each person subject to that requirement will have to decide to purchase health insurance or not. Some will, others will not.

So who needs to get online to make that decision? - Darn few of us.

Suggest removal:

3parlayhenry(148 comments)posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago

Here is the solution for anyone who knows anything about negotiating: Instead of sending a clean "CR" back to the House, the Senate needs to attach a couple bills of their own, to get the ball rolling. Attach an assault weapons ban, strict background checks for gun purchases and remove the tax exemption for religious organizations. Then, sit down to a conference committee.

Suggest removal:

476Ytown(1150 comments)posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago

The facts, please.

Seriously Now: 49% of the US population has employer sponsored health insurance. 5% individual coverage. 16% Medicaid. 13% Medicare. 1% Other Public. 16% uninsured

This is data from (2010-2011), U.S. but those numbers have been dropping dramatically recently due to the ACA. Would love to see the most up to date numbers.

http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/...

The CNN/ORC International Survey of 1,022 adults conducted Sept. 6-8 found that only 39 percent favored all or most of the provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

That's down from 51 percent in January, CNN reports.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/poll...

A new poll released today from CNN shows public support for Obamacare plummeting below 40 percent, a significant drop that comes as Congress considers defunding the unfair, unworkable and unaffordable health-care law.

In January 51% said they favored all or most of the provisions in the new law. Now that figure is down to 39%.

Support has dropped in virtually all demographic categories, but it has fallen the farthest among two core Democratic groups – women and Americans who make less than $50,000.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport