facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Dems vote to curb filibusters on appointees



Published: Thu, November 21, 2013 @ 3:17 p.m.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democrats eased the way for swift approval of President Barack Obama's current and future nominees on today, voting unilaterally to overturn decades of Senate precedent and undermine Republicans' ability to block final votes.

The 52-48 vote to undercut venerable filibuster rules on presidential appointees capped more than a decade of struggle in which presidents of both parties complained about delays in confirming appointees, particularly to the federal courts.

At the White House, Obama applauded the vote. He said Republicans had used delaying tactics "as a reckless and relentless tool to grind all business to a halt."

"And that's not what our founders intended. And it's certainly not what our country needs right now," the president said.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who launched the effort, accused Republicans of "unbelievable, unprecedented obstruction" of Obama's selections to fill court vacancies and other offices.


Comments

1redeye1(4709 comments)posted 1 year, 1 month ago

The filibuster has been there forever. Now this lowlife arse gets rid of it. I can't until next year after the elections and most if not all of these liberturds who voted for this are thrown out by the voting public. Then watch them cry that this unfair. We can only hope that the smart people see what the liberturds are doing. Taking over our Gov't away from the people

Suggest removal:

2JoeFromHubbard(1133 comments)posted 1 year, 1 month ago

Just like Obama, if you don't like your rules, you can change them.

Suggest removal:

3LtMacGowan(669 comments)posted 1 year, 1 month ago

What would you suggest? The GOP has been blocking every one of his Court Appointments.

Suggest removal:

4kk80586(227 comments)posted 1 year, 1 month ago

It is my understanding that the current court does not have enough workload to support the 8 judges now so since obozo is just "stacking" the jury for political reasons he deserves to have them blocked. Out of about 1200 appointees only 27 were not confirmed. What are they whining about??

Suggest removal:

5JoeFromHubbard(1133 comments)posted 1 year, 1 month ago

@ LtMac Gowan:

LT, the best solution would be to have a Republican majority in the Senate.

That would solve a multitude of problems.

Suggest removal:

676Ytown(1304 comments)posted 1 year, 1 month ago

"Thursday’s vote marked a major shift in more than 200 years of Senate precedent that required a 60-vote majority to assure a final vote on most presidential nominees.

Mid-term elections: Vote out every incumbent that followed Pelosi when she said " We have to pass the bill (healthcare) to see what's in it" Despicable!

One thing Obama didn't lie about "I'm going to fundamentally transform the United States Of America"

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes