- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Campbell teacher pleads in gun case

Published: Wed, November 20, 2013 @ 12:07 a.m.

By jeanne starmack



A Campbell Memorial High School teacher who had a gun in his car on school property settled his criminal case in court Tuesday with a plea to a lesser offense.

City police stopped Jason McCray, 36, an integrated-business teacher at the high school for the past six years, at Sixth Street and Blossom Avenue at 3:06 p.m. Nov. 8 and cited for going 34 mph in a 20 mph school zone, according to a police report.

During the stop, McCray told the officer he had a gun in his car and had a concealed-carry license. The gun was underneath the driver’s seat, the report says.

McCray told the officer he was a teacher and had just left work. He said the gun was in his car over his vacation.

The officer gave McCray back the gun because his permit was legal. Police, however, eventually charged McCray with conveyance or possession of a deadly weapon on school property, a fifth-degree felony.

“Mr. McCray broke the law, and that needs to be officially addressed,” said city Police Chief Drew Rauzan. “We want to spread the word that [if] anyone, under any circumstances, if for any reason, brings a weapon onto school property, including parking lots, they will be charged.”

Police issued a warrant for McCray’s arrest last week, and on Friday, prosecuting and defense attorneys worked out a summons so he could turn himself in on that warrant for the next court day, Rauzan said.

McCray turned himself in Tuesday, was arrested and booked, then appeared in municipal court to plead guilty to a lesser charge of aggravated trespassing, a first-degree misdemeanor.

A judge fined him $250 and gave him a 180-day suspended jail sentence.

He is to turn his gun in at the police department and will not get it back, Rauzan said.

Schools Superintendent Matthew Bowen said the district placed McCray on paid administrative leave Monday, and will schedule a formal disciplinary hearing that will include union representation for the teacher.

He said McCray has been “professional, cooperative and honest” about what was happening.

“We are following the process to the letter of the law,” Bowen said. “Our goal is to maintain a safe environment for our schoolchildren.”

The district also will report the case to the Ohio Department of Education, he said.

A statement Bowen issued says the district will not comment further until its investigation is finished.

McCray had no comment.


1southsidedave(5041 comments)posted 1 year, 5 months ago

That is rough, but rules must be enforced

Suggest removal:

2walter_sobchak(2080 comments)posted 1 year, 5 months ago

When the police pull you over for a traffic stop, you are under "arrest". At that point, you are specifically guaranteed the right against self-incrimination. While I believe under CCW laws in Ohio he agrees to disclose that he has a weapon to law enforcement. But, I don't believe he is obligated to say where he has been. I don't believe that it should be a crime for a teacher to have a weapon in their car on school property if they have a CCW permit. If he must drive to or through a dangerous area like the East Side or South Side of Y-town, a weapon is most likely required for existence. Just keep your mouth shut!

Suggest removal:

3michael1757(322 comments)posted 1 year, 5 months ago

I think he said he was a teacher at the school,& thought maybe he'd get a break on the speeding ticket.He was honest about the gun,& his paperwork is in order.He shouldn't lose his job over this.A reprimand would be good,the case dismissed,& hopefully,when no-ones lookin',he'll get his gun back.

Suggest removal:

4DSquared(1465 comments)posted 1 year, 5 months ago

Liberalism run amuck! No common sense or logic applied in any part of this circus! Good Grief!

Suggest removal:

5HSG(164 comments)posted 1 year, 5 months ago

I think this man's due process rights were violated, specifically the right to not give evidence against himself (5th Amendment, US Constitution).

If, in fact, the Sobchakian one is correct (and I hate to admit that possibility) and the gent was 'under arrest,' then he should not/cannot be compelled to provide information about himself.

The alternative was to lie when asked as to his prior whereabouts. So he is either guilty of the conveyance offense, or hindering a police investigation, by lying.

A third alternative, silence, broadly implies guilt in our culture, and will require a trip in the cruiser to police headquarters, something that most citizens abhor. It does, however, provide time for some clear thinking and contact with legal defense.

From all aspects, a bad deal.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2015 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes