facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Wash. bridge collapse points to bigger problems throughout US



Published: Sat, May 25, 2013 @ 12:00 a.m.

McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON

The collapse of an interstate-highway bridge in Washington state brings new attention to the limits of the country’s infrastructure, especially older structures that were designed with little room for error and never were intended to carry the number of cars and trucks they see today.

The 58-year-old Interstate 5 bridge over the Skagit River in Mount Vernon, Wash., was considered outdated but not structurally deficient. Though state police believe an oversize truck hitting the bridge may have contributed to its collapse, an investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board ultimately will pinpoint the cause.

Bridge experts said the I-5 bridge shares a design feature with thousands of other bridges across the country that make them more vulnerable to failure. The bridge was fracture-critical, which means there is no redundancy in the structure — if one component fails, the whole bridge can collapse. It’s a scenario that’s happened before, and experts say it will happen again if older, obsolete bridges are not replaced or reinforced.

“This is a repetitive story that’s going to play out again like a horrible nightmare,” said Barry LePatner, a New York construction lawyer who’s identified nearly 8,000 of the country’s most-troublesome spans.

A 40-year-old interstate bridge in Minneapolis that collapsed into the Mississippi River in 2007 also had a fracture-critical design. Thirteen people were killed and scores more were injured. No one was killed or seriously injured in Thursday’s collapse.

“It could have been a lot worse,” said Pat Natale, executive director of the American Society of Civil Engineers.

Another fracture-critical bridge over the Ohio River between Louisville, Ky., and New Albany, Ind., was closed for several months in 2011 after inspectors discovered a large, hidden crack that could have proved disastrous. Engineers added reinforcement to the structure for a fraction of the cost of replacement, and LePatner said that a bridge such as the one on I-5 similarly could have been made stronger.

“Government officials have failed to fund needed maintenance, and these bridges have long passed their intended lifespan,” he said.

The oldest parts of the Interstate Highway System are more than 50 years old and need repairs and replacement just as states and the federal government confront shrinking funds to build and maintain infrastructure.

At a news conference Friday, Washington Secretary of Transportation Lynn Peterson said that only the section of the bridge that collapsed would be rebuilt. Washington Gov. Jay Inslee said the repair would cost $15 million — a replacement could cost many times more.

“Under current fiscal constraints, there’s no intent to rebuild the entire bridge,” Peterson said.

Washington state has much incentive to finish the repairs quickly. I-5 is the primary highway corridor along the Pacific Coast, carrying an average of 71,000 vehicles including 10,000 trucks a day, which will have to endure lengthy and costly detours until the bridge is repaired.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced Friday that $1 million in emergency federal funds would be available to help repair the bridge.

But the bridge will reopen with the same narrow lanes and low clearances it always had — it predates the interstate system and was not constructed to federal standards for interstates. Many of such bridges on the interstate system, including this one and others on I-5, were “grand-fathered in,” said Sean McNally, a spokesman for the American Trucking Associations, an industry group. “This is designed to a different era,” he said.

Copyright 2013 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Comments

1ytownsteelman(628 comments)posted 1 year, 3 months ago

Roads are not a priority for government, not even here in Youngstown, but are in fact one of the few things that government should be doing. Roads are a true "public good", something that we cannot build individually so we pool our money into govt. who does it for us. But when govt. would rather blow money on bankrupt solar companies or give it away to Egypt we have nothing to look forward to but more bridge failures.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport