Mahoning County leads Ohio in population loss

Staff/wire report


A record number of U.S. counties — more than 1 in 3 — are now dying off, hit by an aging population and weakened local economies that are spurring young adults to seek jobs and build families elsewhere.

U.S. Census Bureau estimates show Mahoning County leading Ohio in terms of population lost between July 1, 2011, and July 1, 2012. During that time, the county’s population declined by 1,509 people.

“This has been going on for years,” said Thomas Finnerty, associate director of Youngstown State University’s Center for Urban and Regional Studies. “It’s just simple math; more people are dying than being born here. We have an elderly population not being replaced by births. This will continue as more and more young people leave the area and older stay and then die.”

The county lost 3,678 people between April 1, 2010, and July 1, 2012, according to census estimates.

The estimates are based on local records of births and deaths, Internal Revenue Service records of people moving within the United States and census statistics on immigrants.

Tom Humphries, Youngstown/Warren Regional Chamber president and chief executive, said although there might be accuracy to the Census Bureau’s new estimates, the Mahoning Valley — and Mahoning County in particular — are in an economic transition that doesn’t mean population decline in the future.

He said efforts to diversify the local economy and recent developments such as the boom in shale-gas drilling and manufacturing’s expansion in the area have the ability to retain younger families and attract a younger population.

“This is not a spike; it’s a long-term change,” Humprhies said. “We believe at the chamber that this will be true. More economic diversity means more industry to choose from — and that’s significant.”

Based on rough estimates, Humphries said about 45 percent of the chamber’s economic work has been oil and gas related, while 55 percent has dealt with other industries such as food processing and warehousing, for example.

“I definitely think we should be looking forward,” he added.

The census data highlight the population shifts as the U.S. encounters its most sluggish growth levels since the Great Depression.

Census data show that 1,135 of the nation’s 3,143 counties are now experiencing “natural decrease,” where deaths exceed births. That’s up from roughly 880 U.S. counties, or 1 in 4, in 2009. Already apparent in Japan and many European nations, natural decrease is now increasingly evident in large swaths of the U.S.

The findings also reflect the increasing economic importance of foreign-born residents as the U.S. ponders an overhaul of a major 1965 federal immigration law.

Without new immigrants, many metropolitan areas such as New York, Chicago, Detroit, Pittsburgh and St. Louis would have posted flat or negative population growth in the last year.

“Immigrants are innovators, entrepreneurs, they’re making things happen. They create jobs,” said Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, a Republican, at an immigration conference in his state last week. Saying Michigan should be a top destination for legal immigrants to come and boost Detroit and other struggling areas, Snyder made a special appeal: “Please come here.”

The growing attention on immigrants is coming mostly from areas of the Midwest and Northeast, which are seeing many of their residents leave after years of staying put during the downturn.

With a slowly improving U.S. economy, young adults are now back on the move, departing traditional big cities to test the job market mostly in the South and West, which had sustained the biggest hits in the housing bust.

Despite increasing deaths, the U.S. population as a whole continues to grow, boosted by immigration from abroad and relatively higher births among the mostly younger migrants from Mexico, Latin America and Asia.

“These counties are in a pretty steep downward spiral,” said Kenneth Johnson, a senior demographer and sociology professor at the University of New Hampshire, who researched the findings. “The young people leave and the older adults stay in place and age. Unless something dramatic changes — for instance, new development such as a meat-packing plant to attract young Hispanics — these areas are likely to have more and more natural decrease.”

The areas of natural decrease stretch from industrial areas near Pittsburgh and Cleveland to the vineyards outside San Francisco to the rural areas of east Texas and the Great Plains.

A common theme is a waning local economy, such as farming, mining or industrial areas. They also include some retirement communities in Florida, although many are cushioned by a steady flow of new retirees each year.

In the last year, Maine joined West Virginia as the only two entire states where deaths exceed births, which have dropped precipitously after the recent recession. As a nation, the U.S. population grew by just 0.75 percent last year, stuck at historically low levels not seen since 1937.

Johnson said the number of dying counties is rising not only because of fewer births but also increasing mortality as 70 million baby boomers born between 1946 and 1964 move into their older years. “I expect natural decrease to remain high in the future,” he said.

Among the 20 fastest-growing large metropolitan areas last year, 16 grew faster than in 2011 and most of them are located in previously growing parts of the Sun Belt or Mountain West.

Among the slowest-growing or declining metropolitan areas, most are now doing worse than in 2011 and they are all located in the Northeast and Midwest.

New York ranks tops in new immigrants among large metro areas, but also ranks at the top for young residents moving away.

In contrast, the Texas metropolitan areas of Dallas, Houston and Austin continued to be big draws for young adults, ranking first, second and fourth among large metro areas in domestic migration due to diversified economies that include oil and gas production. Phoenix, Las Vegas and Orlando also saw gains.

By region, growth in the Northeast slowed last year to 0.3 percent, the lowest since 2007; in the Midwest, growth dipped to 0.25 percent, the lowest in at least a decade. In the South and West, growth rates ticked up to 1.1 percent and 1.04 percent, respectively.

Vindicator reporters Jamison Cocklin and David Skolnick contributed to this story.

Don't Miss a Story

Sign up for our newsletter to receive daily news directly in your inbox.