Standing firm on new firearm restrictions, Colorado Democrats were advancing aggressive gun-control proposals Friday in a state balancing a history of heartbreaking shootings with a Western heritage where gun ownership is treasured by many.
Democrats shepherded through expanded background checks on private gun purchases and a new ban on gun ownership by people facing domestic-violence accusations. The measures passed after hours of debate as Republicans tried in vain to argue the gun proposals change Colorado’s character and violate the Western ideal of self-reliance.
“What do we hate today? Freedom? Liberty?” said Republican Sen. Ted Harvey of Highlands Ranch. “The right of self-protection?”
The debate in Colorado was being watched nationally as a bellwether of how far politically moderate states are willing to go with new gun laws in the wake of mass shootings in a suburban Denver movie theater and a Connecticut elementary school. Already, the White House has weighed in, with Vice President Joe Biden phoning four lawmakers while on a recent ski vacation here to nudge the Democrats during their first major gun debate last month.
Democrats have argued the recent mass shootings painfully illustrate the need for tighter gun controls. They insisted the gun-control measures don’t compromise Colorado’s gun-loving heritage.
“I’m a gun owner, and I have been since I was 12 years old,” said Democratic Sen. Mike Johnston of Denver. “What is before us is not a constitutional question but a policy question.”
Even as Democrats stood firm on the stricter gun laws, parts of their package were in question Friday.
One of the bills — to end Colorado’s unusual practice of allowing concealed weapons on public college campuses — was in doubt, as was a set of liability standards for sellers and owners of assault weapons used in crimes.
Debate was expected to last late into the night, even as an approaching snowstorm had out-of-town senators scrambling to arrange hotel rooms.
Lobbying has been intense on Colorado’s gun measures, and the pressure grew Friday. A suburban gun-accessory maker that has threatened to leave the state if the magazine limit passes sent company executives to lobby wavering Democrats on that measure.
Some Democrats have reported getting threatening emails and phone calls. As senators debated, a man accused of threatening one of the Democrats appeared in court to answer criminal charges. In an appearance just down the street from the Capitol, Franklin Sain’s lawyer told a judge Friday that Sain’s emails and calls to state Rep. Rhonda Fields were constitutionally protected political speech.
Back in the Senate, lawmakers slogged through seven gun bills while deeper philosophical barbs about gun rights peppered the debate.
“This is a day of dysfunctionalism,” griped Republican Sen. Steve King of Grand Junction.
Democrats frequently cited the Connecticut school shooting and the Aurora theater shooting as they argued the limits are needed.
Arguing for the magazine ammunition limits, Democratic Sen. Mary Hodge said the change to Colorado’s heritage and the potential inconveniences on gun owners paled in comparison to the pain of gun violence.
“This bill is merely an attempt to reduce the slaughter,” Hodge said.