facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Tricky political proposition



Published: Fri, March 8, 2013 @ 12:00 a.m.

By David Skolnick (Contact)


On the side

Mayoral debate: The 7th Ward Citizens Coalition will sponsor a debate of the three candidates running in the Democratic Youngstown mayoral primary at 7 p.m. March 21 at the D.D. & Velma Davis Center at Mill Creek Park’s Fellows Riverside Gardens.

A panel of local journalists, including our own Bertram de Souza, will ask questions to the three candidates: council President Jamael Tito Brown, John McNally IV, a former Mahoning County commissioner and city law director, and Matthew Smith.

The debate will run for 90 minutes and is open to the public.

Rich businessman/politician: During a U.S. House Ways and Means Committee meeting, Rep. Mike Kelly of Butler, Pa., R-3rd and super-rich guy, went off on politicians who tax, but have never run a business.

He said: “We [in Washington] don’t understand how badly we have hurt people’s outlooks into the future with any type of confidence that they can survive in an area where the government should be your friend … and you know what? We’re just the opposite.”

Reducing voting precincts is tricky — more so for the political implications than the ease of those going to the polls.

In Mahoning County, the number of voting precincts has declined from 412 to 273 in the past 12 years.

While that’s a huge reduction, Mahoning still has the lowest number of voters per precincts among the state’s 13 most-populous counties.

Mahoning has 623 voters per precinct. In second is Trumbull with 721 and that county’s board of elections agreed to a precinct reduction to take effect in 2015.

And with early voting, the number of voters per precinct is considerably lower statewide

Reducing precincts

The Mahoning County Board of Elections is looking at reducing precincts without causing voters to travel by consolidating at polling locations with multiple precincts. For example, a polling location with seven precincts could end up with five precincts at the same building.

It’s logical and saves money.

Each precinct reduced saves about $1,000 to $1,200 per election.

Most of the precincts cut would be in Youngstown, Struthers and Campbell, which has some of the lowest voters per precinct in the county.

Here’s where it gets political, and could cause issues.

All voting precincts elect central committee members for the county’s Democratic and Republican parties.

Those committee members in the Democratic Party vote on endorsements and filling vacancies when elected officials leave office before their terms expire.

County GOP Chairman Mark Munroe, who is also head of the board of elections, wants to eliminate 50 to 90 precincts.

In a very Democratic county, Republicans have virtually no presence in Youngstown, Struthers and Campbell so cuts there will have little impact on the GOP.

There are several precincts in those three communities without a Republican precinct committee representative.

On the other side, those are very strong Democratic portions of the county. Well, Democrats are strong throughout the county, but those are three of the party’s power bases.

County Democratic Party Chairman David Betras, who serves as the board of elections’ vice chairman, agrees that precincts need to be reduced.

But he isn’t ready to put a number on how many should be cut until he determines the impact of voters by reducing specific precincts.

It will happen, with the board expecting the reduction in time for the November general election.

One key stumbling block is if or when Youngstown redistricts its seven wards so that each has close to the same number of residents.

Vague amendment

Youngstown voters approved a vaguely written charter amendment last November about redistricting. The language doesn’t compel council to redistrict now.

Even if council members approve redistricting, they could wait for it to take effect with the next council election in 2015.

Council’s legislation committee may start looking at redistricting in the next week or so.

Until an agreement is made among members of city council and then the board of elections, with input from precinct committee members, there won’t be redistricting or maybe it will be a small reduction like last year when 14 were eliminated.


Comments

1TERRAPINST(281 comments)posted 1 year, 1 month ago

Flick once again
FLICK=IDIOT

Suggest removal:

2TERRAPINST(281 comments)posted 1 year, 1 month ago

By the way Flick, go to the Board of Elections and request the finance reports from any elected official you like-Democrats only, after this review not your opinion which is ALWAYS based on a lack of real fact, list the politicians who haven't taken a contribution from the Cafaros-I am certain even your favorites make the list.

Suggest removal:

3valleypolitics(87 comments)posted 1 year, 1 month ago

The real questions voters have to ask McNally is, is he still under investigation by the feds and are the indictments over?

To Terrapinst, the evidence indicates McNally does have a relationship with the Cafaros, and we all know campaign finance reports never tell the whole story.

Suggest removal:

4TERRAPINST(281 comments)posted 1 year, 1 month ago

Trafficant, Tablack, and I know you cuddle with them Flick. Flick here's the deal. You continue to bash a guy who the Courts determined did nothing wrong/Civil suit AND had all charges dropped against him by those that filed them/Criminal. Why do you just ignore that? Did you really just bring up Emrich, you must be so old you don't matter anymore. Still a Democrat even though every corrupted, indicted, jailed public official hails from that party. My problem with you is that even though McNally was relieved of any wrongdoing you trash him because you know better than the courts, the prosecutors. Hey Flick, if you are so dissatisfied-run for something. You could file as a Republican and show some brains.

Suggest removal:

5TERRAPINST(281 comments)posted 1 year, 1 month ago

Oh yeah Valleyp: Im sure the Feds always tell people when they are continuing to investigate them. Target letters are only given to people they wish to squeeze. Why don't you ask the Feds. they ALWAYS tell the truth. Again, people are allowed to lobby their public officials in this country its legal-that's what the Cafaros did as determined by the COURT. McNally never said save McGuffey so the Cafaros can keep getting the rent like they need it. No he said Oakhill is a bad idea and it has proven to be with yet another public agency< the Youngstown Board of Health> bailing this week.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport