facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Spending cuts appear to be here to stay



Published: Mon, March 4, 2013 @ 12:15 a.m.

photo

The U.S. Capitol is seen in Washington. After months of dire warnings about the across-the-board spending cuts, the $85 billion budget trigger didn’t spell doom. On talk shows Sunday, neither Republicans nor Democrats hinted at a tangible proposal for rolling back those cuts, yet Republicans and Democrats have pledged to retroactively undo the cuts.

Associated Press

WASHINGTON

The spending cuts are here to stay, if you believe the public posturing Sunday.

The Senate’s Republican leader Mitch McConnell called them modest. House Speaker John Boehner isn’t sure the cuts will hurt the economy. The White House’s top economic adviser, Gene Sperling, said the pain isn’t that bad right now.

So after months of dire warnings, Washington didn’t implode, government didn’t shut down and the $85 billion budget trigger didn’t spell doom. And no one has a tangible proposal for rolling back those cuts.

“This modest reduction of 2.4 percent in spending over the next six months is a little more than the average American experienced just two months ago, when their own pay went down when the payroll tax holiday expired,” McConnell said.

“I don’t know whether it’s going to hurt the economy or not,” Boehner said. “I don’t think anyone quite understands how the sequester is really going to work.”

Both parties cast blame on the other for the automatic, across-the-board spending cuts but gave little guidance on what to expect in the coming weeks. Republicans and Democrats pledged to retroactively undo the cuts but signaled no hints as to how that process would start to take shape. Republicans insisted there would be no new taxes and Democrats refused to talk about any bargain without them.

“That’s not going to work,” said Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H. “If we’re going to increase revenue again, it’s got to go to the debt with real entitlement reform and real tax reform when you actually lower rates. ... I’m not going to agree to any more tax increases that are going to go to increase more government.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said any tax increases were unacceptable.

All of this comes ahead of a new, March 27 deadline that could spell a government shutdown and a debt-ceiling clash coming in May.

Boehner said his chamber would move this week to pass a measure to keep government open through Sept. 30. McConnell said a government shutdown was unlikely to come from his side of Capitol Hill. The White House said it would dodge the shutdown and roll back the cuts, which hit domestic and defense spending in equal share.

“We will still be committed to trying to find Republicans and Democrats that will work on a bipartisan compromise to get rid of the sequester,” Sperling said.

Obama has phoned lawmakers but it isn’t clear to what end; the White House refused Sunday to release the names of lawmakers Obama phoned. Boehner and McConnell said they had a productive meeting with Obama on Friday, but it didn’t yield a deal.

Obama and the Republicans have been fighting over federal spending since the opposition party regained control of the House of Representatives in the 2010 midterm elections.

The budget cuts were designed in 2011 to be so ruthless that both sides would be forced to find a better deal, but they haven’t despite two years to find a compromise.


Comments

1Sensible(118 comments)posted 1 year, 7 months ago

I don't understand how McConnell comes up with 2.4 %.
The Congressional Budget office says it's 10% for Defense and 7.8% for non-defense and 2% for Medicare.

Sequester imposed a 2% cut on Medicare.

Suggest removal:

2Gman(46 comments)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

Sensible,
".. The Congressional Budget office says it's 10% for Defense and 7.8% for non-defense and 2% for Medicare.. "
Over what time-frame ?
.
"This modest reduction of 2.4 percent in spending over the next six months", McConnell said
.

The Federal Government is over-spending by 40% and has been over-spending for decades! This is insane. And now the sane people request that we reduce that over-spending down to only 37% and Obama claims this will be financially devastating? I guess it will be to all of the Government workers who are getting "paid" with BORROWED MONEY! You see you really don't have a "job" because you are just receiving WELFARE money from another PONZI SCHEME. Your salaries must be paid back with interest by YOUR Children and YOUR Grand-Children! Didn't Bernie Madoff go to Jail for his PONZI Scheme?

Suggest removal:

3Sensible(118 comments)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

@ Gman,
From CB0
"Reductions ranging from 10.0 percent (in 2013) to 8.5 percent (in 2021) in the
caps on new discretionary appropriations for defense programs, yielding total
outlay savings of $454 billion."

" Reductions ranging from 7.8 percent (in 2013) to 5.5 percent (in 2021) in the caps on new discretionary appropriations for nondefense programs, resulting in outlay savings of $294 billion."

I have no idea what McConnell is talking about - maybe he was misquoted or taken out of context.

Suggest removal:

4SeriouslyNow(192 comments)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

@hman,
So sometimes you believe the CBO, other times you say they should not be believed?

How do you tell the difference?

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport