- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Prosecutors can say 'profiled' at Zimmerman trial

Published: Fri, June 21, 2013 @ 2:45 p.m.

SANFORD, Fla. (AP) — Prosecutors can argue in opening statements that George Zimmerman profiled Trayvon Martin based on factors such as age or clothing before he shot the unarmed 17-year-old, but they cannot say he was profiled based on race, a judge ruled today.

Judge Debra Nelson made the ruling ahead of Monday's expected opening statements in Zimmerman's second-degree murder trial.

Defense attorneys had asked the judge to prohibit prosecutors from using a series of words in opening statements that they deemed inflammatory. Those words included "profiled," ''vigilante," ''wannabe cop," and that Zimmerman had confronted Martin, who was black. Zimmerman identifies as Hispanic.

The judge said all of those statements may be used, provided that race is not discussed if the issue of profiling is brought up.

Prosecutor John Guy had argued that there were a number of ways someone could be profiled other than race.

"That is not a racially charged term unless it's made so, and we don't intend to make it a racially charged term," Guy said. "There are a number of avenues someone can be profiled in any one way or combination. We don't intend to say he was solely profiled because of race."

Defense attorney Mark O'Mara said he was concerned using the word "profiled" would "infect" the jury with a racial component that shouldn't be there.

"I want to be very, very cautious," O'Mara said.

Six female jurors were chosen Thursday for the second-degree murder trial of Zimmerman, a former neighborhood watch volunteer who says he fired on Martin in self-defense last year in a gated community in Sanford. Zimmerman is pleading not guilty.


1Jerry(859 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago


What is your EVIDENCE for drawing the conclusion that "..... he (Zimmerman) provoked the argument and the violence that insued.(sic)"

The ONLY questions here are who started the physical violence and when did the gun come out. Once that is determined, if it can be determined, we can decide who was acting in self defense.

I am not privy to all the evidence or the trial proceedings; however, I have seen no EVIDENCE in the media to dispute Zimmerman's side of the story. Have you???

Suggest removal:

2excel(1306 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

This case is a prime example of why we should get all of the guns off the streets. Only our military and law enforcement have any real need for firearms.

Suggest removal:

3redeye1(5662 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

Excel go live in a cave why don't you> This kid was probably high on weed or something . That gave him muscles and he thought he could beat anyone . he lost!!!!!! Another example that you shouldn't smoke weed and go out.

Suggest removal:

4Jerry(859 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago


That's your evidence???

My whole point........Unless you know something I don't, there is reason to doubt Zimmerman's story, and there is reason to doubt the prosecution's story. I believe "reason to doubt" means acquittal; or at least it used to.

I'll await the results of the actual trial, where the evidence is presented and reviewed.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes